Identification of microbial signatures linked to oilseed rape yield decline at the landscape scale.


Journal

Microbiome
ISSN: 2049-2618
Titre abrégé: Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101615147

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 01 2021
Historique:
received: 02 06 2020
accepted: 07 12 2020
entrez: 23 1 2021
pubmed: 24 1 2021
medline: 11 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The plant microbiome plays a vital role in determining host health and productivity. However, we lack real-world comparative understanding of the factors which shape assembly of its diverse biota, and crucially relationships between microbiota composition and plant health. Here we investigated landscape scale rhizosphere microbial assembly processes in oilseed rape (OSR), the UK's third most cultivated crop by area and the world's third largest source of vegetable oil, which suffers from yield decline associated with the frequency it is grown in rotations. By including 37 conventional farmers' fields with varying OSR rotation frequencies, we present an innovative approach to identify microbial signatures characteristic of microbiomes which are beneficial and harmful to the host. We show that OSR yield decline is linked to rotation frequency in real-world agricultural systems. We demonstrate fundamental differences in the environmental and agronomic drivers of protist, bacterial and fungal communities between root, rhizosphere soil and bulk soil compartments. We further discovered that the assembly of fungi, but neither bacteria nor protists, was influenced by OSR rotation frequency. However, there were individual abundant bacterial OTUs that correlated with either yield or rotation frequency. A variety of fungal and protist pathogens were detected in roots and rhizosphere soil of OSR, and several increased relative abundance in root or rhizosphere compartments as OSR rotation frequency increased. Importantly, the relative abundance of the fungal pathogen Olpidium brassicae both increased with short rotations and was significantly associated with low yield. In contrast, the root endophyte Tetracladium spp. showed the reverse associations with both rotation frequency and yield to O. brassicae, suggesting that they are signatures of a microbiome which benefits the host. We also identified a variety of novel protist and fungal clades which are highly connected within the microbiome and could play a role in determining microbiome composition. We show that at the landscape scale, OSR crop yield is governed by interplay between complex communities of both pathogens and beneficial biota which is modulated by rotation frequency. Our comprehensive study has identified signatures of dysbiosis within the OSR microbiome, grown in real-world agricultural systems, which could be used in strategies to promote crop yield. Video abstract.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The plant microbiome plays a vital role in determining host health and productivity. However, we lack real-world comparative understanding of the factors which shape assembly of its diverse biota, and crucially relationships between microbiota composition and plant health. Here we investigated landscape scale rhizosphere microbial assembly processes in oilseed rape (OSR), the UK's third most cultivated crop by area and the world's third largest source of vegetable oil, which suffers from yield decline associated with the frequency it is grown in rotations. By including 37 conventional farmers' fields with varying OSR rotation frequencies, we present an innovative approach to identify microbial signatures characteristic of microbiomes which are beneficial and harmful to the host.
RESULTS
We show that OSR yield decline is linked to rotation frequency in real-world agricultural systems. We demonstrate fundamental differences in the environmental and agronomic drivers of protist, bacterial and fungal communities between root, rhizosphere soil and bulk soil compartments. We further discovered that the assembly of fungi, but neither bacteria nor protists, was influenced by OSR rotation frequency. However, there were individual abundant bacterial OTUs that correlated with either yield or rotation frequency. A variety of fungal and protist pathogens were detected in roots and rhizosphere soil of OSR, and several increased relative abundance in root or rhizosphere compartments as OSR rotation frequency increased. Importantly, the relative abundance of the fungal pathogen Olpidium brassicae both increased with short rotations and was significantly associated with low yield. In contrast, the root endophyte Tetracladium spp. showed the reverse associations with both rotation frequency and yield to O. brassicae, suggesting that they are signatures of a microbiome which benefits the host. We also identified a variety of novel protist and fungal clades which are highly connected within the microbiome and could play a role in determining microbiome composition.
CONCLUSIONS
We show that at the landscape scale, OSR crop yield is governed by interplay between complex communities of both pathogens and beneficial biota which is modulated by rotation frequency. Our comprehensive study has identified signatures of dysbiosis within the OSR microbiome, grown in real-world agricultural systems, which could be used in strategies to promote crop yield. Video abstract.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33482913
doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00972-0
pii: 10.1186/s40168-020-00972-0
pmc: PMC7825223
doi:

Substances chimiques

Rapeseed Oil 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Video-Audio Media

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19

Subventions

Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/L025892/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/E/C/0005196
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/C/000IO310
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Nature. 2011 May 11;474(7350):200-3
pubmed: 21562490
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
J Exp Bot. 2001 Mar;52(Spec Issue):487-511
pubmed: 11326055
Plant Mol Biol. 2016 Apr;90(6):575-87
pubmed: 26729479
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):E9403-E9412
pubmed: 28973917
Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(21):5271-7
pubmed: 24112409
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Dec;82(3):666-77
pubmed: 22738186
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jun;18(6):2010-24
pubmed: 26768496
Syst Biol. 2008 Oct;57(5):758-71
pubmed: 18853362
Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2614-25
pubmed: 17089669
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 26;7:227
pubmed: 26955371
Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):895-900
pubmed: 15729348
Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):271-280
pubmed: 28547606
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59859
pubmed: 23573215
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(9):e1002687
pubmed: 23028285
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013 Sep;37(5):634-63
pubmed: 23790204
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 17;103(3):626-31
pubmed: 16407148
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1196-206
pubmed: 25655016
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3
pubmed: 24451623
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;983:1-15
pubmed: 23494299
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Dec;70(6 Pt 2):066111
pubmed: 15697438
ISME J. 2012 Mar;6(3):610-8
pubmed: 22134646
Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;13(6):1642-54
pubmed: 21507180
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 17;9:1205
pubmed: 30174681
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Oct 31;83(22):
pubmed: 28887416
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
Bioinformatics. 2014 Oct;30(19):2811-2
pubmed: 24930139
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):543-555
pubmed: 30372522
Front Plant Sci. 2015 May 27;6:385
pubmed: 26074945
New Phytol. 2008;178(1):3-7
pubmed: 18315696
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005 Mar-Apr;52(2):95-106
pubmed: 15817114
Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):296-310
pubmed: 18047587
Cell. 2018 Nov 1;175(4):973-983.e14
pubmed: 30388454
Cell. 2017 May 4;169(4):587-596
pubmed: 28475891
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 20;14(1):e1002352
pubmed: 26788878
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;37:23-28
pubmed: 28437662
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 08;9:1188
pubmed: 29937756
Mycol Res. 2009 Apr;113(Pt 4):450-60
pubmed: 19138737
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Dec;90(3):543-50
pubmed: 25314312
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):505-11
pubmed: 25428498
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Feb;87(1):52-71
pubmed: 21631700
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):478-86
pubmed: 22564542
Fungal Biol. 2017 Jun - Jul;121(6-7):561-572
pubmed: 28606351
Front Microbiol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1321
pubmed: 26640462
Phytopathology. 2016 Oct;106(10):1083-1096
pubmed: 27482625
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):695-700
pubmed: 7683183
PLoS Biol. 2017 Mar 28;15(3):e2001793
pubmed: 28350798
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 May 1;234(1):75-80
pubmed: 15109722
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Mar;24(3):194-198
pubmed: 30670324
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Sep;16(9):567-576
pubmed: 29789680
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D597-604
pubmed: 23193267
IMA Fungus. 2011 Dec;2(2):173-5
pubmed: 22679602
Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):86-90
pubmed: 22859206
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):926-36
pubmed: 27264635

Auteurs

Sally Hilton (S)

School of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. s.hilton.1@warwick.ac.uk.

Emma Picot (E)

School of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Susanne Schreiter (S)

Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.

David Bass (D)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 8UB, UK.

Keith Norman (K)

Velcourt Group Ltd., The Veldt House, Much Marcle, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 2LJ, UK.

Anna E Oliver (AE)

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.

Jonathan D Moore (JD)

John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.

Tim H Mauchline (TH)

Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.

Peter R Mills (PR)

Harper Adams University, Newport, TF10 8NB, UK.

Graham R Teakle (GR)

School of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Ian M Clark (IM)

Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.

Penny R Hirsch (PR)

Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.

Christopher J van der Gast (CJ)

Department of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK.

Gary D Bending (GD)

School of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. gary.bending@warwick.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota

Classifications MeSH