Euthanasia in Belgium: Shortcomings of the Law and Its Application and of the Monitoring of Practice.
Belgium
ethical analysis
euthanasia
law
shortcomings
Journal
The Journal of medicine and philosophy
ISSN: 1744-5019
Titre abrégé: J Med Philos
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7610512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 01 2021
25 01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2002 with the passing of the Euthanasia Law, Belgium became one of the few countries worldwide to legalize euthanasia. In the 18 years since the passing of the law, much has changed. We argue that in Belgium a widening of the use of euthanasia is occurring and that this can be ethically and legally problematic. This is in part related to the fact that several legal requirements intended to operate as safeguards and procedural guarantees in reality often fail to operate as such. We focus on three kinds of safeguards or procedural guarantees: (1) the legally defined due care criteria for eligibility for euthanasia; (2) the consultation of a second (and sometimes third) physician; and (3) the reporting of euthanasia cases to the Federal Control and Evaluation Commission for Euthanasia. We will show how each of these three safeguards can exhibit shortcomings in theory and practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33491735
pii: 6118631
doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80-107Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.