Achieving Optimal Medical Therapy: Insights From the ORBITA Trial.
Amlodipine
/ therapeutic use
Bisoprolol
/ administration & dosage
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
/ physiology
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Isosorbide Dinitrate
/ analogs & derivatives
Male
Middle Aged
Nicorandil
/ administration & dosage
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Ranolazine
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Vasodilator Agents
/ administration & dosage
adverse effects
angina
compliance/adherence
medical therapy
randomized controlled trial
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 02 2021
02 02 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
1
2021
medline:
14
10
2021
entrez:
26
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background In stable coronary artery disease, medications are used for 2 purposes: cardiovascular risk reduction and symptom improvement. In clinical trials and clinical practice, medication use is often not optimal. The ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina) trial was the first placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention. A key component of the ORBITA trial design was the inclusion of a medical optimization phase, aimed at ensuring that all patients were treated with guideline-directed truly optimal medical therapy. In this study, we report the medical therapy that was achieved. Methods and Results After enrollment into the ORBITA trial, all 200 patients entered a 6-week period of intensive medical therapy optimization, with initiation and uptitration of risk reduction and antianginal therapy. At the prerandomization stage, the median number of antianginals established was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). A total of 195 patients (97.5%) reached the prespecified target of ≥2 antianginals; 136 (68.0%) did not stop any antianginals because of adverse effects, and the median number of antianginals stopped for adverse effects per patient was 0 (interquartile range, 0-1). Amlodipine and bisoprolol were well tolerated (stopped for adverse effects in 4/175 [2.3%] and 9/167 [5.4%], respectively). Ranolazine and ivabradine were also well tolerated (stopped for adverse effects in 1/20 [5.0%] and 1/18 [5.6%], respectively). Isosorbide mononitrate and nicorandil were stopped for adverse effects in 36 of 172 (20.9%) and 32 of 141 (22.7%) of patients, respectively. Statins were well tolerated and taken by 191 of 200 (95.5%) patients. Conclusions In the 12-week ORBITA trial period, medical therapy was successfully optimized and well tolerated, with few drug adverse effects leading to therapy cessation. Truly optimal medical therapy can be achieved in clinical trials, and translating this into longer-term clinical practice should be a focus of future study. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02062593.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33496201
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017381
pmc: PMC7955412
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Vasodilator Agents
0
Amlodipine
1J444QC288
Nicorandil
260456HAM0
Ranolazine
A6IEZ5M406
Isosorbide Dinitrate
IA7306519N
isosorbide-5-mononitrate
LX1OH63030
Bisoprolol
Y41JS2NL6U
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02062593']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e017381Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S021108/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR300166
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006002
pubmed: 31718297
Am Heart J. 2016 May;175:94-100
pubmed: 27179728
QJM. 2010 May;103(5):305-10
pubmed: 20181676
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1393-401
pubmed: 24678939
BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):551-3
pubmed: 7663213
Lancet. 1994 Nov 19;344(8934):1383-9
pubmed: 7968073
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16
pubmed: 17387127
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1903-9
pubmed: 21093036
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477
pubmed: 31504439
Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):31-40
pubmed: 29103656
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1780-1792
pubmed: 29789302
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001
pubmed: 22924638
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e017381
pubmed: 33496201
BMJ. 2016 Feb 05;352:i205
pubmed: 26850069
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1444-1451
pubmed: 32234534
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407
pubmed: 32227755
Lancet. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1275-81
pubmed: 19332353
N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 14;359(7):677-87
pubmed: 18703470
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 2;326(1):10-6
pubmed: 1345754
Lancet. 1997 Aug 16;350(9076):461-8
pubmed: 9274581
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006265
pubmed: 31718295