Early versus delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction with biologic mesh following damage-control surgery.
Abdominal Wall
/ surgery
Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
/ instrumentation
Adult
Aged
Biological Products
Female
Hernia, Ventral
/ surgery
Herniorrhaphy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ surgery
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ instrumentation
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Mesh
Time-to-Treatment
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
12
5
2021
entrez:
28
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Damage-control surgery for trauma and intra-abdominal catastrophe is associated with a high rate of morbidities and postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing early complex abdominal wall reconstruction (e-CAWR) in acute settings versus those undergoing delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction (d-CAWR). This study was a pooled analysis derived from the retrospective and prospective database between the years 2013 and 2019. The outcomes were compared for differences in demographics, presentation, intraoperative variables, Ventral Hernia Working Grade (VHWG), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound class, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates. We performed Student's t test, χ2 test, and Fisher's exact test to compare variables of interest. Multivariable linear regression model was built to evaluate the association of hospital length of stay and all other variables including the timing of complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Of the 236 patients who underwent CAWR with biological mesh, 79 (33.5%) had e-CAWR. There were 45 males (57%) and 34 females (43%) in the e-CAWR group. The ASA scores of IV and V, and VHWG grades III and IV were significantly more frequent in the e-CAWR group compared with the d-CAWR one. Postoperatively, the incidence of surgical site occurrence, Clavien-Dindo complications, comprehensive complication index, unplanned reoperations, and mortality were similar between the two groups. Backward linear regression model showed that the timing of CAWR (β = -11.29, p < 0.0001), ASA (β = 3.98, p = 0.006), VHWG classification (β = 3.62, p = 0.015), drug abuse (β = 13.47, p = 0.009), and two comorbidities of cirrhosis (β = 12.34, p = 0.001) and malignancy (β = 7.91, p = 0.008) were the significant predictors of the hospital length of stay left in the model. Early CAWR led to shorter hospital length of stay compared with d-CAWR in multivariable regression model. Therapeutic, level IV.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Damage-control surgery for trauma and intra-abdominal catastrophe is associated with a high rate of morbidities and postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing early complex abdominal wall reconstruction (e-CAWR) in acute settings versus those undergoing delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction (d-CAWR).
METHOD
This study was a pooled analysis derived from the retrospective and prospective database between the years 2013 and 2019. The outcomes were compared for differences in demographics, presentation, intraoperative variables, Ventral Hernia Working Grade (VHWG), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound class, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates. We performed Student's t test, χ2 test, and Fisher's exact test to compare variables of interest. Multivariable linear regression model was built to evaluate the association of hospital length of stay and all other variables including the timing of complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Of the 236 patients who underwent CAWR with biological mesh, 79 (33.5%) had e-CAWR. There were 45 males (57%) and 34 females (43%) in the e-CAWR group. The ASA scores of IV and V, and VHWG grades III and IV were significantly more frequent in the e-CAWR group compared with the d-CAWR one. Postoperatively, the incidence of surgical site occurrence, Clavien-Dindo complications, comprehensive complication index, unplanned reoperations, and mortality were similar between the two groups. Backward linear regression model showed that the timing of CAWR (β = -11.29, p < 0.0001), ASA (β = 3.98, p = 0.006), VHWG classification (β = 3.62, p = 0.015), drug abuse (β = 13.47, p = 0.009), and two comorbidities of cirrhosis (β = 12.34, p = 0.001) and malignancy (β = 7.91, p = 0.008) were the significant predictors of the hospital length of stay left in the model.
CONCLUSION
Early CAWR led to shorter hospital length of stay compared with d-CAWR in multivariable regression model.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, level IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33507024
pii: 01586154-202103000-00017
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003011
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biological Products
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
527-534Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR 3rd, Fruchterman TM, Kauder DR, Latenser BA, Angood PA. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma . 1993;35:375–382; discussion 382-3.
Sutton E, Bochicchio GV, Bochicchio K, Rodriguez ED, Henry S, Joshi M, Scalea TM. Long term impact of damage control surgery: a preliminary prospective study. J Trauma . 2006;61:831–834; discussion 835-6.
Higa G, Friese R, O’Keeffe T, Wynne J, Bowlby P, Ziemba M, Latifi R, Kulvatunyou N, Rhee P. Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused. J Trauma . 2010;69:53–59.
Huang YH, Li YS. Open abdomen in trauma patients: a double-edged sword. Mil Med Res . 2016;3:10.
Jernigan TW, Fabian TC, Croce MA, Moore N, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Bee TK. Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects: acute and long-term results. Ann Surg . 2003;238(3):349–357.
Diaz JJ Jr., Cullinane DC, Khwaja KA, et al. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma: management of the open abdomen, part III—review of abdominal wall reconstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2013;75(3):376–386.
Millikan KW. Incisional hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am . 2003;83:1223–1234.
Moore M, Bax T, MacFarlane M, McNevin MS. Outcomes of the fascial component separation technique with synthetic mesh reinforcement for repair of complex ventral incisional hernias in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg . 2008;195:575–579; discussion 579.
Heartsill L, Richards ML, Arfai N, Lee A, Bingener-Casey J, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR. Open rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair made simple and successful but not for everyone. Hernia . 2005;9:162–166.
Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res . 2013;183(1):104–110.
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event: Center for Disease Control. 2010. Updated January 2015. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf?agree=yes&next=Accept . Accessed June 3, 2019.
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control . 2008;36:309–332.
GlobalSurg Collaborative. Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis . 2018;18:516–525.
Morales-Conde S, Suárez-Artacho G, Socas M, Barranco A. Influence of fibrin sealant in preventing postoperative seroma and normalizing the abdominal wall after laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia. Surg Endosc . 2013;27:3214–3219.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg . 2004;240(2):205–213.
Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg . 2013;258:1–7.
Albanese AR. Gigantic median xipho-umbilical eventration; method for treatment. Rev Asoc Med Argent . 1951;65(709–710):376–378.
Albanese AR. Liberating incisions in the treatment of large supraumbilical eventrations. Prensa Med Argent . 1966;53(38):2222–2227.
Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg . 2012;204(5):709–716.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ . 2007;335:806–808.
Chen Y, Ye J, Song W, Chen J, Yuan Y, Ren J. Comparison of outcomes between early fascial closure and delayed abdominal closure in patients with open abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract . 2014;2014:784056.
Sharrock AE, Barker T, Yuen HM, Rickard R, Tai N. Management and closure of the open abdomen after damage control laparotomy for trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury . 2016;47:296–306.
Usher FC. New technique for repairing incisional hernias with Marlex mesh. Am J Surg . 1979;138:740–741.
Voyles CR, Richardson JD, Bland KI, Tobin GR, Flint LM, Polk HC Jr. Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh: short-term benefits versus long-term complications. Ann Surg . 1981;194(2):219–223.
Stone HH, Fabian TC, Turkleson ML, Jurkiewicz MJ. Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall. Ann Surg . 1981;193(5):612–618.
McCarthy JD, Twiest MW. Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh support of incisional herniorraphy. Am J Surg . 1981;142:707–711.
Arai M, Kim S, Ishii H, Hagiwara J, Kushimoto S, Yokota H. The long-term outcomes of early abdominal wall reconstruction by bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method in critically ill patients requiring open abdomen. World J Emerg Surg . 2018;13(1):39.
Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D; Ventral Hernia Working Group. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery . 2010;148:544–558.
Sandvall BK, Suver DW, Said HK, Mathes DW, Neligan PC, Dellinger EP, Louie O. Comparison of synthetic and biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair using components separation technique. Ann Plast Surg . 2016;76:674–679.
Sbitany H, Kwon E, Chern H, Finlayson E, Varma MG, Hansen SL. Outcomes analysis of biologic mesh use for abdominal wall reconstruction in clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg . 2015;75:201–204.
Misra S, Raj PK, Tarr SM, Treat RC. Results of AlloDerm use in abdominal hernia repair. Hernia . 2008;12:247–250.
Sosin M, Nahabedian MY, Bhanot PT. The perfect plane: a systematic review of mesh location and outcomes, update 2018. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2018;142(Suppl 3):107S–116S.
Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg . 2016;40:89–99.
Gogna S, Latifi R, Choi J, Con J, Prabhakaran K, Smiley A, Anderson PL. Predictors of 30- and 90-day readmissions after complex abdominal wall reconstruction with biological mesh: a longitudinal study of 232 patients. World J Surg . 2020;44:3720–3728.