Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infections in Critical Care Staff: Beware the Risks Beyond the Bedside.
Adult
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
COVID-19 Serological Testing
Critical Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Personnel
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
London
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Admission
Personnel, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
SARS-CoV-2
/ pathogenicity
Tertiary Care Centers
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
30
1
2021
medline:
5
3
2021
entrez:
29
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Critical care workers were considered to be at high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection from patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Staff symptoms, previous swab testing, and antibody prevalence were correlated with patient admissions to investigate this assumption. Cross-sectional study. A large critical care department in a tertiary-care teaching hospital in London, United Kingdom. Staff working in critical care. None. Participants completed a questionnaire and provided a serum sample for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 antibody testing over a 3-day period in April 2020. We compared the timing of symptoms in staff to the coronavirus disease 2019 patient admissions to critical care. We also identified factors associated with antibody detection. Of 625 staff 384 (61.4%) reported previous symptoms and 124 (19.8%) had sent a swab for testing. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection had been confirmed in 37 of those swabbed (29.8%). Overall, 21% (131/625) had detectable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 antibody, of whom 9.9% (13/131) had been asymptomatic. The peak onset of symptoms among staff occurred 2 weeks before the peak in coronavirus disease 2019 patient admissions. Staff who worked in multiple departments across the hospital were more likely to be seropositive. Staff with a symptomatic household contact were also more likely to be seropositive at 31.3%, compared with 16.2% in those without (p < 0.0001). Staff who developed coronavirus disease 2019 were less likely to have caught it from their patients in critical care. Other staff, other areas of the hospital, and the wider community are more likely sources of infection. These findings indicate that personal protective equipment was effective at preventing transmission from patients. However, staff also need to maintain protective measures away from the bedside.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33512941
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004878
pii: 00003246-202103000-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
428-436Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19078
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Drs. Rosadas, McClure, and Tedder declare an interest in the Imperial Hybrid double antigen binding assay (DABA) (patent file IRN.FID4816059). Dr. Rosadas received funding from Imperial College London and disclosed that she is included as an inventor in a patent filed for the Imperial Hybrid DABA (FID4816059). Dr. Cherepanov received support for article research from Wellcome Trust/Charity Open Access Fund. Dr. McClure received support for article research from the Medical Research Council. Dr. Tedder received funding from the Medical Research Council and U.K. Research and Innovation research funding to develop serology. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Arabi YM, Murthy S, Webb S. COVID-19: A novel coronavirus and a novel challenge for critical care. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46:833–836
Rosenbaum L. Harnessing our humanity - how Washington’s health care workers have risen to the pandemic challenge. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:2069–2071
Gallagher TH, Schleyer AM. “We signed up for this!” - student and trainee responses to the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:e96
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid Risk Assessment: Increased Transmission of COVID-19 in the EU/EEA and the UK – Twelfth Update. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-risk-assessment-increased-transmission-twelfth-update . Accessed October 19, 2020
Rosadas C, Randell P, Khan M, et al. Testing for responses to the wrong SARS-CoV-2 antigen? Lancet. 2020; 396:e23
Ju B, Zhang Q, Ge J, et al. Human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature. 2020; 584:115–119
Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25:2000045
Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: Estimation and application. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172:577–582
Belingheri M, Paladino ME, Riva MA. Beyond the assistance: Additional exposure situations to COVID-19 for healthcare workers. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 105:353
Weissman DN, de Perio MA, Radonovich LJ Jr. COVID-19 and risks posed to personnel during endotracheal intubation. JAMA. 2020; 323:2027–2028
El-Boghdadly K, Wong DJN, Owen R, et al. Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: A prospective international multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:1415–1419
Shields A, Faustini SE, Perez-Toledo M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study. Thorax. 2020; 75:1089–1094
Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey Pilot: England, 28 June 2020. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/12june2020 . Accessed October 19, 2020
Public Health England. Weekly Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Surveillance Report. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/891721/Weekly_COVID19_Surveillance_Report_-_week_24.pdf . Accessed October 19, 2020
Treibel TA, Manisty C, Burton M, et al. COVID-19: PCR screening of asymptomatic health-care workers at London hospital. Lancet. 2020; 395:1608–1610
Hunter E, Price DA, Murphy E, et al. First experience of COVID-19 screening of health-care workers in England. Lancet. 2020; 395:e77–e78
Gan WH, Lim JW, Koh D. Preventing intra-hospital infection and transmission of COVID-19 in healthcare workers. Saf Health Work. 2020; 11:241–243
Chew NWS, Lee GKH, Tan BYQ, et al. A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 88:559–565
Steensels D, Oris E, Coninx L, et al. Hospital-wide SARS-CoV-2 antibody screening in 3056 staff in a tertiary center in Belgium. JAMA. 2020; 324:195–197
Ong JJY, Bharatendu C, Goh Y, et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment - a cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache. 2020; 60:864–877
Long QX, Liu BZ, Deng HJ, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020; 26:845–848
Yongchen Z, Shen H, Wang X, et al. Different longitudinal patterns of nucleic acid and serology testing results based on disease severity of COVID-19 patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020; 9:833–836
Long QX, Tang XJ, Shi QL, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Med. 2020; 26:1200–1204