Shoulder resurfacing for treatment of focal defects and diffuse osteoarthritis.
Resurfacing der Schulter zur Behandlung von fokalen Defekten und diffuser Arthrose.
Hemiarthroplasty
Humeral head
Nonspherical anatomic humeral head
Resurfacing
Total shoulder arthroplasty
Journal
Der Orthopade
ISSN: 1433-0431
Titre abrégé: Orthopade
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0331266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
3
2
2021
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
2
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article provides a review of the various options for the treatment of osteoarticular pathology of the shoulder. This can range from focal osteochondral defects to diffuse arthritis and can occur at any age. Although total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty are the most frequently used methods, they not generally suitable for younger patients under 60 years old due to the lack of long-term stability and deterioration. If conservative treatment is unsuccessful or not an option, resurfacing is an alternative procedure with good long-term results. The various methods that have been reported for resurfacing and partial resurfacing of the humeral head are described as well as the results of studies on these procedures. In this article the indications, biomechanics, outcomes and complications are outlined for the two resurfacing options preferred by the authors. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Optionen zur Behandlung der osteoartikulären Pathologie der Schulter. Diese kann von fokalen osteochondralen Defekten bis hin zu diffuser Arthrose reichen und in jedem Alter auftreten. Obwohl die Schultertotalendoprothese und die Hemiarthroplastik die am häufigsten verwendeten Methoden sind, eignen sie sich aufgrund der fehlenden Langzeitstabilität und der Verschlechterung im Allgemeinen nicht für jüngere Patienten unter 60 Jahren. Wenn eine konservative Behandlung nicht erfolgreich ist oder keine Option darstellt, ist das Resurfacing ein alternatives Verfahren mit guten Langzeitergebnissen. Es werden sowohl die verschiedenen Methoden für das Resurfacing bzw. das partielle Resurfacing des Humeruskopfes beschrieben als auch die Ergebnisse von Studien zu diesen Verfahren. In diesem Artikel werden Indikationen, Biomechanik, Ergebnisse und Komplikationen der beiden von den Autoren bevorzugten Resurfacing-Varianten beschrieben.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Optionen zur Behandlung der osteoartikulären Pathologie der Schulter. Diese kann von fokalen osteochondralen Defekten bis hin zu diffuser Arthrose reichen und in jedem Alter auftreten. Obwohl die Schultertotalendoprothese und die Hemiarthroplastik die am häufigsten verwendeten Methoden sind, eignen sie sich aufgrund der fehlenden Langzeitstabilität und der Verschlechterung im Allgemeinen nicht für jüngere Patienten unter 60 Jahren. Wenn eine konservative Behandlung nicht erfolgreich ist oder keine Option darstellt, ist das Resurfacing ein alternatives Verfahren mit guten Langzeitergebnissen. Es werden sowohl die verschiedenen Methoden für das Resurfacing bzw. das partielle Resurfacing des Humeruskopfes beschrieben als auch die Ergebnisse von Studien zu diesen Verfahren. In diesem Artikel werden Indikationen, Biomechanik, Ergebnisse und Komplikationen der beiden von den Autoren bevorzugten Resurfacing-Varianten beschrieben.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33527158
doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-04055-8
pii: 10.1007/s00132-020-04055-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
112-118Références
National Joint Replacement Registry, The Australian Orthopaedic Association (2014ed) Demographics and outcomes of shoulder Arthroplasty: supplementary report 2012
Bessette MC, Frisch NC, Kodali P, Jones MH, Miniaci A (2017) Partial resurfacing for humeral head defects associated with recurrent shoulder instability. Orthopedics 40(6):e996–e1003
pubmed: 29058754
Boileau P, Avidor C, Krishnan SG, Walch G, Kempf J‑F, Molé D (2002) Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(4):351–359
pubmed: 12195253
Boileau P, O’Shea K, Vargas P, Pinedo M, Old J, Zumstein M (2012) Anatomical and functional results after arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(7):618–626
pubmed: 22488618
Büchler P, Farron A (2004) Benefits of an anatomical reconstruction of the humeral head during shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 19(1):16–23
Burgess DL, McGrath MS, Bonutti PM, Marker DR, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2009) Shoulder resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg 91(5):1228–1238
pubmed: 19411474
Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000) Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 16(7):677–694
pubmed: 11027751
Bushnell BD, Creighton RA, Herring MM (2008) Bony instability of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 24(9):1061–1073
pubmed: 18760215
Cil A, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2014) Nonstandard glenoid components for bone deficiencies in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(7):e149–e157
pubmed: 24332950
Clitherow HD, Frampton CM, Astley TM (2014) Effect of glenoid cementation on total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the shoulder: a review of the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(6):775–781
pubmed: 24280355
Cvetanovich GL, Naylor AJ, O’Brien MC, Waterman BR, Garcia GH, Nicholson GP (2020) Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with an inlay glenoid component: clinical outcomes and return to activity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29(6):1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.003
pubmed: 31899092
Egger AC, Peterson J, Jones MH, Miniaci A (2019) Total shoulder arthroplasty with nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid replacement: clinical results comparing concentric and nonconcentric glenoid stages in primary shoulder arthritis. JSES Open Access 3(3):145–153
pubmed: 31709354
pmcid: 6834987
Fox TJ, Foruria AM, Klika BJ, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, Cofield RH (2013) Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(9):1221–1227
pubmed: 23473606
Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Rizzello G, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Arthroscopic salvage of failed arthroscopic Bankart repair: a prospective study with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Am J Sports Med 36(7):1330–1336
pubmed: 18375787
Gagliano JR, Helms SM, Colbath GP, Przestrzelski BT, Hawkins RJ, DesJardins JD (2017) A comparison of onlay versus inlay glenoid component loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26(7):1113–1120
pubmed: 28359697
Giles JW, Elkinson I, Ferreira LM et al (2012) Moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs defects: an in vitro biomechanical comparison of the remplissage procedure, allograft humeral head reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(9):1142–1151
pubmed: 22036545
Gunther SB, Tran SK (2019) Long-term follow-up of total shoulder replacement surgery with inset glenoid implants for arthritis with deficient bone. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28(9):1728–1736
pubmed: 31005482
Hammond G, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Jun B‑J, Lee TQ (2012) Biomechanical comparison of anatomic humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasty in functional glenohumeral positions. J Bone Joint Surg 94(1):68–76
pubmed: 22218384
Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB (1995) The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(4):555–563
pubmed: 7713972
Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT (2002) Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(4):331–338
pubmed: 12195250
Hill CL, Gill TK, Shanahan E, Taylor AW (2010) Prevalence and correlates of shoulder pain and stiffness in a population-based study: the North West Adelaide Health Study. Int J Rheum Dis 13(3):215–222
pubmed: 20704617
Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck S, Evans B, Misra S (1992) The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(4):491–500
pubmed: 1583043
Issa K, Pierce CM, Pierce TP et al (2016) Total shoulder arthroplasty demographics, incidence, and complications—a nationwide inpatient sample database study. Surg Technol Int 29:240–246
pubmed: 27608744
Jobe CM, Lannotti JP (1995) Limits imposed on glenohumeral motion by joint geometry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4(4):281–285
pubmed: 8542371
Jun BJ, Iannotti JP, McGarry MH, Yoo JC, Quigley RJ, Lee TQ (2013) The effects of prosthetic humeral head shape on glenohumeral joint kinematics: a comparison of non-spherical and spherical prosthetic heads to the native humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(10):1423–1432
pubmed: 23510747
Klika BJ, Wooten CW, Sperling JW et al (2014) Structural bone grafting for glenoid deficiency in primary total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(7):1066–1072
pubmed: 24332952
Levine WN, Fischer CR, Nguyen D, Flatow EL, Ahmad CS, Bigliani LU (2012) Long-term follow-up of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 94(22):e164
pubmed: 23172331
Mansat P, Briot J, Mansat M, Swider P (2007) Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(3):S79–S83
pubmed: 17493558
Merolla G, Paladini P, Di Napoli G, Campi F, Porcellini G (2015) Outcomes of arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage and anterior Bankart repair: a retrospective controlled study including ultrasound evaluation of posterior capsulotenodesis and infraspinatus strength assessment. Am J Sports Med 43(2):407–414
pubmed: 25504843
Miniaci A, Gish MW (2004) Management of anterior glenohumeral instability associated with large Hill-Sachs defects. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 5(3):170–175
Moroder P, Runer A, Kraemer M et al (2015) Influence of defect size and localization on the engagement of reverse Hill-Sachs lesions. Am J Sports Med 43(3):542–548
pubmed: 25646360
Norris TR, Iannotti JP (2002) Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(2):130–135
pubmed: 11988723
Park MJ, Tjoumakaris FP, Garcia G, Patel A, Kelly IVJD (2011) Arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair for the treatment of glenohumeral instability with Hill-Sachs defects. Arthroscopy 27(9):1187–1194
pubmed: 21820842
Pearl ML (2005) Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1):S99–S104
Pearl ML, Volk AG (1996) Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5(4):320–326
pubmed: 8872931
Phillips J, Runciman R, Miniaci A (2004) Mathematical modeling of humeral head geometry. Paper presented at: surgery of the shoulder and elbow: an international perspective. Selected proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Surgery of the Shoulder,.
Ross M, Glasson J‑M, Alexander J et al (2020) Medium to long-term results of a recessed glenoid for glenoid resurfacing in total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 12(1 Suppl):31–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573219826341
doi: 10.1177/1758573219826341
pubmed: 33343714
Scalise JJ, Miniaci A, Iannotti JP (2007) Resurfacing arthroplasty of the humerus: indications, surgical technique, and clinical results. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(3):152–160
Schoch B, Schleck C, Cofield RH, Sperling JW (2015) Shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years: minimum 20-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(5):705–710
pubmed: 25306496
Sekiya JK, Wickwire AC, Stehle JH, Debski RE (2009) Hill-Sachs defects and repair using osteoarticular allograft transplantation: biomechanical analysis using a joint compression model. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2459–2466
pubmed: 19726622
Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2004) Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(6):604–613
pubmed: 15570228
Steffee A, Moore R (1984) Hemi-resurfacing arthroplasty of the shoulder. Contemp Orthop 9(1):51–59
Sweet SJ, Takara T, Ho L, Tibone JE (2015) Primary partial humeral head resurfacing: outcomes with the HemiCAP implant. Am J Sports Med 43(3):579–587
pubmed: 25564407
Uribe JW, Botto-van Bemden A (2009) Partial humeral head resurfacing for osteonecrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(5):711–716
pubmed: 19186078
Walch G, Moraga C, Young A, Castellanos-Rosas J (2012) Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(11):1526–1533
pubmed: 22445158
Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H et al (2007) Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5):649–656
pubmed: 17644006