Beyond platitudes: a qualitative study of Australian Aboriginal people's perspectives on biobanking.


Journal

Internal medicine journal
ISSN: 1445-5994
Titre abrégé: Intern Med J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101092952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
revised: 02 01 2021
received: 17 04 2020
accepted: 17 01 2021
pubmed: 3 2 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 2 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biobanks are vital resources for genetics and genomics, and it is broadly recognised that for maximal benefit it is essential that they include samples and data from diverse ancestral groups. The inclusion of First Nations people, in particular, is important to prevent biobanking research from exacerbating existing health inequities, and to ensure that these communities share in the benefits arising from research. To explore the perspectives of Australian Aboriginal people whose tissue - or that of their family members - has been stored in the biobank of the National Centre for Indigenous Genomics (NCIG). Semi-structured interviews with 42 Aboriginal people from the Titjikala, Galiwinku, Tiwi Islands, Yarrabah, Fitzroy Crossing, Derby, One Arm Point and Mulan communities, as well as a formal discussion with A. Hermes, an Indigenous Community Engagement Coordinator at the NCIG who had conducted the interviews. The interviews and the structured discussion were double coded using a procedure informed by Charmaz's outline of grounded theory analysis and Morse's outline of the cognitive basis of qualitative research. In this article, we report on A. Hermes' interviews with members from the above Aboriginal communities, as well as on her personal views, experiences, and interpretations of the interviews she conducted with other community members. We found that participation in the NCIG biobank raised issues around broken trust, grief and loss, but also - somewhat unexpectedly - was perceived as a source of empowerment, hope and reconnection. This research reminds us (again) of the need to engage deeply with communities in order to respond appropriately with respect for their cultural values and norms, and to develop culturally relevant policies and processes that enhance the benefits of biobank participation and minimise potential harms.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Biobanks are vital resources for genetics and genomics, and it is broadly recognised that for maximal benefit it is essential that they include samples and data from diverse ancestral groups. The inclusion of First Nations people, in particular, is important to prevent biobanking research from exacerbating existing health inequities, and to ensure that these communities share in the benefits arising from research.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To explore the perspectives of Australian Aboriginal people whose tissue - or that of their family members - has been stored in the biobank of the National Centre for Indigenous Genomics (NCIG).
METHODS METHODS
Semi-structured interviews with 42 Aboriginal people from the Titjikala, Galiwinku, Tiwi Islands, Yarrabah, Fitzroy Crossing, Derby, One Arm Point and Mulan communities, as well as a formal discussion with A. Hermes, an Indigenous Community Engagement Coordinator at the NCIG who had conducted the interviews. The interviews and the structured discussion were double coded using a procedure informed by Charmaz's outline of grounded theory analysis and Morse's outline of the cognitive basis of qualitative research.
RESULTS RESULTS
In this article, we report on A. Hermes' interviews with members from the above Aboriginal communities, as well as on her personal views, experiences, and interpretations of the interviews she conducted with other community members. We found that participation in the NCIG biobank raised issues around broken trust, grief and loss, but also - somewhat unexpectedly - was perceived as a source of empowerment, hope and reconnection.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This research reminds us (again) of the need to engage deeply with communities in order to respond appropriately with respect for their cultural values and norms, and to develop culturally relevant policies and processes that enhance the benefits of biobank participation and minimise potential harms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33528097
doi: 10.1111/imj.15223
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1426-1432

Subventions

Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : APP1083980

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Références

Parodi B. Biobanks: a definition. In: Mascalzoni D, ed. Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, Vol. 14. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2015; 9-15.
Bardill J, Garrison NA. Naming indigenous concerns, framing considerations for stored biospecimens. Am J Bioeth 2015; 15: 73-5.
Sirugo G, Williams SM, Tishkoff SA. The missing diversity in human genetic studies. Cell 2019; 177: 26-31.
Aramoana J, Koea J. An integrative review of the barriers to indigenous peoples participation in biobanking and genomic research. J Glob Oncol 2019; 6: 83-91.
Easteal S, Arkell RM, Balboa RF, Bellingham SA, Brown AD, Calma T et al. Equitable expanded carrier screening needs indigenous clinical and population genomic data. Am J Hum Genet 2020; 107: 175-82.
Elsum I, McEwan C, Kowal EE, Cadet-James Y, Kelaher M, Woodward L. Inclusion of indigenous Australians in biobanks: a step to reducing inequity in health care. Med J Aust 2019; 211: 7-9.
Kowal EE. Genetic research in indigenous health: significant progress, substantial challenges. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 19-20.
Beaton A, Hudson M, Milne M, Port RV, Russell K, Smith B et al. Engaging Māori in biobanking and genomic research: a model for biobanks to guide culturally informed governance, operational, and community engagement activities. Genet Med 2016; 19: 345-51.
Beaton A, Smith B, Toki V, Southey K. Engaging Maori in biobanking and genetic research: legal, ethical, and policy challenges. Int Indig Policy J 2015; 6: 1-22.
Dive L, Mason P, Light E, Kerridge I, Lipworth W. Globalisation and the ethics of transnational biobank networks. Asian Bioeth Rev 2017; 9: 301-10.
Lipworth W, Kerridge I. Consent to biobank research: facing up to the challenge of globalization. Am J Bioeth 2015; 15: 58-9.
Morgan J, Coe R, Lesueur R, Kenny R, Price R, Makela N et al. Indigenous peoples and genomics: starting a conversation. Genet Couns 2019; 28: 407-18.
National Centre for Indigenous Genomics (NCIG), Australian National University (ANU). Collection sites. Canberra: NCIG, ANU. Available from URL: https://ncig.anu.edu.au/collection/collection-sites.
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2006.
Morse JM. Emerging from the data: the cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In: Morse JM, ed. Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. London, UK: Sage Publications; 1994; 23-43.
Light E, Wiersma M, Dive L, Kerridge I, Critchley C, Lipworth W. Disruption, diversity, and global biobanking. Am J Bioeth 2019; 19: 45-7.
Aborigines Protection Amending Act No. 2, 1915. Available from URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_act/apaa1915n2321.pdf
Lewis D. Australian biobank repatriates hundreds of blood samples. Nature 2020; 577: 11-12.
Groch S. Indigenous blood samples make final journey from lab to country. Canberra: The Canberra Times; 2019 Nov 12. Available from URL: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6484722/what-should-we-do-with-indigenous-dna-samples-in-university-labs/
Arbour L, Cook D. DNA on loan: issues to consider when carrying out genetic research with aboriginal families and communities. Community Genet 2006; 9: 153-60.
Santos L. Genetic research in native communities. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2008; 2: 321-7.
Kowal E, Greenwood A, McWhirter RE. All in the blood: a review of Aboriginal Australians' cultural beliefs about blood and implications for biospecimen research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015; 10: 347-59.
McWhirter RE, Mununggirritj D, Marika D, Dickinson JL, Condon JR. Ethical genetic research in indigenous communities: challenges and successful approaches. Trends Mol Med 2012; 18: 702-8.

Auteurs

Azure Hermes (A)

National Centre for Indigenous Genomics (NCIG), Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Miriam Wiersma (M)

Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Haematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Ian Kerridge (I)

Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Haematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Simon Easteal (S)

National Centre for Indigenous Genomics (NCIG), Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Edwina Light (E)

Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Lisa Dive (L)

Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Wendy Lipworth (W)

Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH