Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's associated sacroiliitis: A cross-sectional study.
Adult
Biomarkers
/ blood
Crohn Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cytokines
/ blood
Female
Humans
Inflammation Mediators
/ blood
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
New York City
/ epidemiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Sacroiliitis
/ diagnostic imaging
Serologic Tests
Young Adult
Crohn's disease
back pain
cytokines
magnetic resonance imaging
sacroiliitis
Journal
International journal of rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1756-185X
Titre abrégé: Int J Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101474930
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
revised:
14
12
2020
received:
29
06
2020
accepted:
09
01
2021
pubmed:
3
2
2021
medline:
11
11
2021
entrez:
2
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prevalence of sacroiliitis in Crohn's disease (CD) is variable depending on defining criteria. This study utilized standardized sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify sacroiliitis in CD patients and its association with clinical and serological markers. Consecutive adult subjects with CD prospectively enrolled from an inflammatory bowel disease clinic underwent SIJ MRI. Data collected included CD duration, history of joint/back pain, human leukocyte antigen-B27 status, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for activity of CD, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, and various serologic markers of inflammation. Three blinded readers reviewed MRIs for active and structural lesions according to the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada modules. Thirty-three CD patients were enrolled: 76% female, 80% White, median age 36.4 years (interquartile range 27.2-49.0), moderate CD activity (mean HBI 8.8 ± SD 4.5). Nineteen subjects (58%) reported any back pain, 13 of whom had inflammatory back pain. Four subjects (12%) showed sacroiliitis using global approach and 6 (18%) met Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society MRI criteria of sacroiliitis. Older age (mean 51.2 ± SD 12.5 vs. 37.2 ± 14; P = .04), history of dactylitis (50.0% vs. 3.4%, P = .03) and worse BASMI (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.4 ± 0.8, P ≤ .001) were associated with MRI sacroiliitis; no serologic measure was associated. There were 12%-18% of CD patients who had MRI evidence of sacroiliitis, which was not associated with back pain, CD activity or serologic measures. This data suggests that MRI is a useful modality to identify subclinical sacroiliitis in CD patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33528900
doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14081
pmc: PMC8665429
mid: NIHMS1759960
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Cytokines
0
Inflammation Mediators
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
582-590Subventions
Organisme : Clinical and Translation Science Center Seed Grant
ID : UL1TR002384
Organisme : Hospital for Special Surgery
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002384
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : TL1 TR000144
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK114252
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68 Suppl 2:ii1-44
pubmed: 19433414
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;8(4):357-63
pubmed: 20096379
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):770-6
pubmed: 19297345
Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Apr-May;13(4-5):467-71
pubmed: 24424189
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jun;64(6):905-10
pubmed: 22275150
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Oct;62(10):3048-58
pubmed: 20496416
Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1693-700
pubmed: 22595313
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
RMD Open. 2018 Jan 12;4(1):e000586
pubmed: 29479474
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):784-8
pubmed: 19147614
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2012 Aug;38(3):501-12
pubmed: 23083751
J Crohns Colitis. 2010 Feb;4(1):7-27
pubmed: 21122488
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;68(7):1669-76
pubmed: 26816002
J Rheumatol. 1988 Jul;15(7):1109-14
pubmed: 3262757
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Jul;14(4):342-7
pubmed: 12118165
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jun;65(6):977-85
pubmed: 23203670
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219854
pubmed: 31329615
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 May;70(5):736-745
pubmed: 29430880
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;78(11):1550-1558
pubmed: 31422357
Nat Genet. 2007 Nov;39(11):1329-37
pubmed: 17952073
Clin Rheumatol. 2000;19(6):445-9
pubmed: 11147753
J Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;23(7):383-391
pubmed: 28937474
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008 Sep;14(9):1175-84
pubmed: 18512248
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Dec;5(12):1424-9
pubmed: 17904915
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Oct;34(10):1218-27
pubmed: 1930310
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):777-83
pubmed: 19297344
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar;60(3):717-27
pubmed: 19248087
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May;76(5):886-890
pubmed: 28179264
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jan;29(2):193-7
pubmed: 18945256
J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):79-86
pubmed: 25320219
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Feb;32(2):387-93
pubmed: 21116820
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):63-69
pubmed: 28939631
J Clin Invest. 2003 Sep;112(5):693-706
pubmed: 12952918
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Nov;74(11):1976-82
pubmed: 24925836
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):949-52
pubmed: 25152017
Science. 2006 Dec 1;314(5804):1461-3
pubmed: 17068223
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Sep;16(4):537-49
pubmed: 12406426
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):481-517
pubmed: 29610508
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1308-14
pubmed: 26286018
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct 15;53(5):703-9
pubmed: 16208659