Factors associated with under-reporting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in cause-of-death records: A comparative study of two national databases in France from 2008 to 2012.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ epidemiology
Cause of Death
Databases as Topic
Death Certificates
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ epidemiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Discharge
/ statistics & numerical data
Poisson Distribution
Sex Factors
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
08
2020
accepted:
18
01
2021
entrez:
3
2
2021
pubmed:
4
2
2021
medline:
28
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To date, no study has evaluated the detection rate of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in cause-of-death records in Europe. Our objectives were to compare the number of deaths attributable to HNSCC from two national databases in France and to identify factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records. The national hospital discharge database and the national underlying cause-of-death records were compared for all HNSCC-attributable deaths in adult patients from 2008 to 2012 in France. Factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records were assessed using multivariate Poisson regression. A total of 41,503 in-hospital deaths were attributable to HNSCC as compared to 25,647 deaths reported in national UCoD records (a detection rate of 62%). Demographics at death were similar in both databases with respect to gender (83% men), age (54% premature deaths at 25-64 years), and geographic distribution. In multivariate Poisson regression, under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records significantly increased in 2012 compared to 2010 (+7%) and was independently associated with a primary HNSCC site other than the larynx, a former primary or second synchronous cancer other than HNSCC, distant metastasis, palliative care, and death in hospitals other than comprehensive cancer care centers. The main study results were robust in a sensitivity analysis which also took into account deaths outside hospital (overall, 51,129 HNSCC-attributable deaths; a detection rate of 50%). For the year 2012, the age-standardized mortality rate for HNSCC derived from underlying cause-of-death records was less than half that derived from hospital discharge summaries (14.7 compared to 34.1 per 100,000 for men and 2.7 compared to 6.2 per 100,000 for women). HNSCC is largely under-reported in cause-of-death records. This study documents the value of national hospital discharge databases as a complement to death certificates for ascertaining cancer deaths.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33534860
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246252
pii: PONE-D-20-25023
pmc: PMC7857613
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0246252Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr Caroline Even reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Innate Pharma, Merck and co, and Merck Serrono, outside and unrelated to the submitted work; Luis Sagaon-Teyssier was an employee of Translational Health Economics Network (THEN); Prof Françoise Huguet reports personal fees from BMS and Merck Serrono, outside and unrelated to the submitted work; Dr Michaël Schwarzinger was an employee of Translational Health Economics Network (THEN), Paris, France, that received a research grant from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) France for the EPICORL study as well as research grants from Abbvie, Gilead and Novartis, outside and unrelated to the submitted work. Other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare.
Références
Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;37(6):857-63
pubmed: 24063904
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):739-46
pubmed: 21189382
Popul Health Metr. 2014 Feb 17;12(1):3
pubmed: 24533639
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;35(2):126-31
pubmed: 20952269
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Oct;51(15):2130-2143
pubmed: 26421817
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Apr;56(4):301-8
pubmed: 11896139
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;62(11):1202-9
pubmed: 19364635
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0135834
pubmed: 26292280
Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):188-94
pubmed: 26683778
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;29(3):495-502
pubmed: 10869322
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Jun 05;14:44
pubmed: 24898538
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Jul 22;11:441-451
pubmed: 31413607
Oral Oncol. 2014 Aug;50(8):732-9
pubmed: 24862544
Oral Oncol. 2017 Feb;65:8-15
pubmed: 28109473
Oral Oncol. 2013 Jan;49(1):9-14
pubmed: 22840787
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 20;102(20):1584-98
pubmed: 20937991
Am J Public Health. 1981 Mar;71(3):242-50
pubmed: 7468855
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;25(8):531-8
pubmed: 20309611
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):1015-1035
pubmed: 30146330
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1885-1906
pubmed: 28390697
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;35(3):243-9
pubmed: 21106450
Popul Health Metr. 2010 May 10;8:9
pubmed: 20459720
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jan;110(1):81-90
pubmed: 23953753
Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):669-75
pubmed: 19728117
Oral Oncol. 2014 Dec;50(12):1169-76
pubmed: 25301563
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544
pubmed: 27733281
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Dec;47(6):491-6
pubmed: 8120506
Popul Health Metr. 2014 May 14;12:14
pubmed: 24982595
Oral Oncol. 2017 Feb;65:76-82
pubmed: 28109472
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e92286
pubmed: 24682186
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Feb;18(2):541-50
pubmed: 19190158