MEG Intersubject Phase Locking of Stimulus-Driven Activity during Naturalistic Speech Listening Correlates with Musical Training.
intersubject analysis
magnetoencephalography
musical training
phase-locking value
speech processing
Journal
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
ISSN: 1529-2401
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8102140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 03 2021
24 03 2021
Historique:
received:
20
04
2020
revised:
13
11
2020
accepted:
17
11
2020
pubmed:
5
2
2021
medline:
18
8
2021
entrez:
4
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Musical training is associated with increased structural and functional connectivity between auditory sensory areas and higher-order brain networks involved in speech and motor processing. Whether such changed connectivity patterns facilitate the cortical propagation of speech information in musicians remains poorly understood. We here used magnetoencephalography (MEG) source imaging and a novel seed-based intersubject phase-locking approach to investigate the effects of musical training on the interregional synchronization of stimulus-driven neural responses during listening to naturalistic continuous speech presented in silence. MEG data were obtained from 20 young human subjects (both sexes) with different degrees of musical training. Our data show robust bilateral patterns of stimulus-driven interregional phase synchronization between auditory cortex and frontotemporal brain regions previously associated with speech processing. Stimulus-driven phase locking was maximal in the delta band, but was also observed in the theta and alpha bands. The individual duration of musical training was positively associated with the magnitude of stimulus-driven alpha-band phase locking between auditory cortex and parts of the dorsal and ventral auditory processing streams. These findings provide evidence for a positive relationship between musical training and the propagation of speech-related information between auditory sensory areas and higher-order processing networks, even when speech is presented in silence. We suggest that the increased synchronization of higher-order cortical regions to auditory cortex may contribute to the previously described musician advantage in processing speech in background noise.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33536196
pii: JNEUROSCI.0932-20.2020
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0932-20.2020
pmc: PMC8018743
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2713-2722Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB009048
Pays : United States
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN1432179
Pays : Canada
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 the authors.
Références
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:879716
pubmed: 21584256
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):2906-15
pubmed: 21414912
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Apr;1252:100-7
pubmed: 22524346
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 12;16(3):e2004473
pubmed: 29529019
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2178
pubmed: 30404485
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1929-1934
pubmed: 28204984
Neuroimage. 2010 May 15;51(1):102-11
pubmed: 20123024
PLoS Biol. 2009 Aug;7(8):e1000170
pubmed: 19668354
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:32-42
pubmed: 27903440
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):1002-15
pubmed: 15809000
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Aug;40(4):2662-73
pubmed: 24890664
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 1;114:49-56
pubmed: 25842290
Science. 2020 Feb 28;367(6481):1043-1047
pubmed: 32108113
Brain Sci. 2014 Jun 10;4(2):405-27
pubmed: 24961769
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;26(5):594-601
pubmed: 18158224
Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:98-108
pubmed: 24055761
Brain. 2006 Oct;129(Pt 10):2562-70
pubmed: 16931534
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;14(1):40-8
pubmed: 20004608
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 18;7:12141
pubmed: 27424918
Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2768-2778
pubmed: 27166170
Neuron. 2012 Nov 8;76(3):486-502
pubmed: 23141061
Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 25;11:479
pubmed: 28890684
PLoS One. 2011 May 11;6(5):e18082
pubmed: 21589653
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):718-24
pubmed: 19471271
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):577-93
pubmed: 20656040
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Feb;37(2):536-46
pubmed: 26538421
J Commun Disord. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):393-402
pubmed: 22766458
J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 9;36(10):3092-101
pubmed: 26961961
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):547-58
pubmed: 17585307
Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 15;25(12):1649-53
pubmed: 26028433
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):37-46
pubmed: 11849614
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 16;6:112
pubmed: 22623915
Curr Biol. 2019 Jun 17;29(12):1924-1937.e9
pubmed: 31130454
Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 07;2:156
pubmed: 21779271
Curr Biol. 2018 Dec 17;28(24):3976-3983.e5
pubmed: 30503620
Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:162-73
pubmed: 23831039
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):78-89
pubmed: 21975452
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152374
pubmed: 27015271
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:179-88
pubmed: 24418502
Elife. 2017 Aug 21;6:
pubmed: 28825896
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt B):304-313
pubmed: 26679327
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 27;7(1):14244
pubmed: 29079809
Neuron. 2020 Jan 22;105(2):385-393.e9
pubmed: 31806493
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 31;32(44):15277-83
pubmed: 23115166
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 24;5:14489
pubmed: 26399909
Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):341-9
pubmed: 15102118
Prog Brain Res. 2015;217:37-55
pubmed: 25725909
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Sep 13;29(10):4017-4034
pubmed: 30395174
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):501-6
pubmed: 22813575
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):11-22
pubmed: 14654453
Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 13;2:113
pubmed: 21716636
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jul 22;29(8):3253-3265
pubmed: 30137239
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jan 1;28(1):387-394
pubmed: 29136105
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13579-13584
pubmed: 29203648
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53398
pubmed: 23408924
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Apr;24(4):956-67
pubmed: 23236208
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):2457-65
pubmed: 26412129
Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:107-27
pubmed: 24845161
Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:49-69
pubmed: 28213134
Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1357-92
pubmed: 22013214
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jun;15(6):884-90
pubmed: 22561454
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:177-86
pubmed: 25726269
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Sep;24(9):2512-21
pubmed: 23599166
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):420-2
pubmed: 17351633
Neuroscience. 2012 Sep 6;219:111-9
pubmed: 22634507
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:361-369
pubmed: 29486325
Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):194-208
pubmed: 10619414
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 4;108(40):16783-8
pubmed: 21930901
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Apr 1;28(4):1209-1218
pubmed: 28203797
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 10;113(19):5212-7
pubmed: 27114512
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 1;196:261-268
pubmed: 30978494
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1148-50
pubmed: 16116456
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):878-887
pubmed: 21236276
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 May;8(5):393-402
pubmed: 17431404
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt B):181-187
pubmed: 28212857
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1068-76
pubmed: 15850725
Science. 2004 Mar 12;303(5664):1634-40
pubmed: 15016991
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:162-174
pubmed: 29366698
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):195-207
pubmed: 9931269
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 7;25(23):3079-85
pubmed: 26549262