Regulatory genomic circuitry of human disease loci by integrative epigenomics.


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 30 10 2019
accepted: 18 12 2020
pubmed: 5 2 2021
medline: 10 3 2021
entrez: 4 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Annotating the molecular basis of human disease remains an unsolved challenge, as 93% of disease loci are non-coding and gene-regulatory annotations are highly incomplete

Identifiants

pubmed: 33536621
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03145-z
pii: 10.1038/s41586-020-03145-z
pmc: PMC7875769
doi:

Substances chimiques

Chromatin 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

300-307

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : HG008155
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U41 HG007234
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : MH109978
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : MH119509
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG009446
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : GM087237
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : HG007234
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH109978
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U01 MH119509
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG058002
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG008155
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R35 HG011317
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM113708
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HG007610
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : HG009446
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : HG009088
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM087237
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : AG058002
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : HG007610
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : GM113708
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HG009088
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

Visscher, P. M. et al. 10 Years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 5–22 (2017).
pubmed: 28686856 pmcid: 5501872 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005
Gallagher, M. D. & Chen-Plotkin, A. S. The post-GWAS era: from association to function. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 717–730 (2018).
pubmed: 29727686 pmcid: 5986732 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.04.002
Ward, L. D. & Kellis, M. Interpreting noncoding genetic variation in complex traits and human disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1095–1106 (2012).
pubmed: 23138309 pmcid: 3703467 doi: 10.1038/nbt.2422
Buniello, A. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1005–D1012 (2019).
pubmed: 30445434 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1120
ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11247
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).
pmcid: 4530010 doi: 10.1038/nature14248
Stunnenberg, H. G. & Hirst, M. The International Human Epigenome Consortium. a blueprint for scientific collaboration and discovery. Cell 167, 1145–1149 (2016).
pubmed: 27863232 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.007
Genomics of Gene Regulation. Genome.gov https://www.genome.gov/Funded-Programs-Projects/Genomics-of-Gene-Regulation (accessed 28 September 2020).
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 817–825 (2010).
pubmed: 20657582 pmcid: 2919626 doi: 10.1038/nbt.1662
Hoffman, M. M. et al. Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation. Nat. Methods 9, 473–476 (2012).
pubmed: 22426492 pmcid: 3340533 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1937
Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43–49 (2011).
pubmed: 21441907 pmcid: 3088773 doi: 10.1038/nature09906
Maurano, M. T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190–1195 (2012).
pubmed: 22955828 pmcid: 3771521 doi: 10.1126/science.1222794
Cantor, R. M., Lange, K. & Sinsheimer, J. S. Prioritizing GWAS results: a review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86, 6–22 (2010).
pubmed: 20074509 pmcid: 2801749 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.017
Farh, K. K.-H. et al. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518, 337–343 (2015).
pubmed: 25363779 doi: 10.1038/nature13835
Dimas, A. S., Deutsch, S. & Stranger, B. E. Common regulatory variation impacts gene expression in a cell type-dependent manner. Science 325, 1246–1250 (2009).
pubmed: 19644074 pmcid: 2867218 doi: 10.1126/science.1174148
Ward, L. D. & Kellis, M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D930–D934 (2012).
pubmed: 22064851 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr917
Pickrell, J. K. Joint analysis of functional genomic data and genome-wide association studies of 18 human traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 559–573 (2014).
pubmed: 24702953 pmcid: 3980523 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.004
Gusev, A. et al. Partitioning heritability of regulatory and cell-type-specific variants across 11 common diseases. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95, 535–552 (2014).
pubmed: 25439723 pmcid: 4225595 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.10.004
Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015).
pubmed: 26414678 pmcid: 4626285 doi: 10.1038/ng.3404
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Large-scale imputation of epigenomic datasets for systematic annotation of diverse human tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 364–376 (2015).
pubmed: 25690853 pmcid: 4512306 doi: 10.1038/nbt.3157
Li, D., Hsu, S., Purushotham, D., Sears, R. L. & Wang, T. Epigenome browser update 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W158–W165 (2019).
pubmed: 31165883 pmcid: 6602459 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz348
Calo, E. & Wysocka, J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell 49, 825–837 (2013).
pubmed: 23473601 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.038
Becker, J. S., Nicetto, D. & Zaret, K. S. H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin: barrier to cell fate changes. Trends Genet. 32, 29–41 (2016).
pubmed: 26675384 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.11.001
Meuleman, W. et al. Index and biological spectrum of human DNase I hypersensitive sites. Nature 584, 244–251 (2020).
pubmed: 32728217 pmcid: 7422677 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2559-3
ENCODE Project Consortium et al. Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes. Nature 583, 699–710 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4
Vierstra, J. et al. Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints. Nature 583, 729–736 (2020).
pubmed: 32728250 pmcid: 7410829 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2528-x
Laslo, P. et al. Multilineage transcriptional priming and determination of alternate hematopoietic cell fates. Cell 126, 755–766 (2006).
pubmed: 16923394 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.052
Blackshear, P. J. et al. Graded phenotypic response to partial and complete deficiency of a brain-specific transcript variant of the winged helix transcription factor RFX4. Development 130, 4539–4552 (2003).
pubmed: 12925582 doi: 10.1242/dev.00661
Olson, J. M. et al. NeuroD2 is necessary for development and survival of central nervous system neurons. Dev. Biol. 234, 174–187 (2001).
pubmed: 11356028 doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0245
Katz, J. P. et al. The zinc-finger transcription factor Klf4 is required for terminal differentiation of goblet cells in the colon. Development 129, 2619–2628 (2002).
pubmed: 12015290 doi: 10.1242/dev.129.11.2619
Jacquemin, P., Martial, J. A. & Davidson, I. Human TEF-5 is preferentially expressed in placenta and binds to multiple functional elements of the human chorionic somatomammotropin-B gene enhancer. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12928–12937 (1997).
pubmed: 9148898 doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.20.12928
Tanaka, T. et al. Dysregulated expression of P1 and P2 promoter-driven hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α in the pathogenesis of human cancer. J. Pathol. 208, 662–672 (2006).
pubmed: 16400631 doi: 10.1002/path.1928
Wagner, E. F. & Eferl, R. Fos/AP-1 proteins in bone and the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 208, 126–140 (2005).
pubmed: 16313345 doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00332.x
MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D896–D901 (2017).
pubmed: 27899670 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1133
Michailidou, K. et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature 551, 92–94 (2017).
pubmed: 29059683 pmcid: 5798588 doi: 10.1038/nature24284
Goes, F. S. et al. Genome-wide association study of schizophrenia in Ashkenazi Jews. Am. J. Med. Genet. B. Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 168, 649–659 (2015).
pubmed: 26198764 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32349
Lupien, M., Markowitz, S. & Scacheri, P. C. Combinatorial effects of multiple enhancer variants in linkage disequilibrium dictate levels of gene expression to confer susceptibility to common traits. Genome Res. 24, 1–13 (2014).
pubmed: 24196873 pmcid: 3875850 doi: 10.1101/gr.164079.113
Henstridge, C. M., Hyman, B. T. & Spires-Jones, T. L. Beyond the neuron–cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 94–108 (2019).
pubmed: 30643230 pmcid: 6545070 doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0113-1
Winkler, T. W. et al. The influence of age and sex on genetic associations with adult body size and shape: a large-scale genome-wide interaction study. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005378 (2015).
pubmed: 26426971 pmcid: 4591371 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005378
van der Harst, P. & Verweij, N. Identification of 64 novel genetic loci provides an expanded view on the genetic architecture of coronary artery disease. Circ. Res. 122, 433–443 (2018).
pubmed: 29212778 pmcid: 5805277 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312086
Abifadel, M. et al. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat. Genet. 34, 154–156 (2003).
pubmed: 12730697 doi: 10.1038/ng1161
Busnelli, M. et al. Liver-specific deletion of the Plpp3 gene alters plasma lipid composition and worsens atherosclerosis in apoE
pubmed: 28291223 pmcid: 5349609 doi: 10.1038/srep44503
Lappegård, K. T. et al. A vital role for complement in heart disease. Mol. Immunol. 61, 126–134 (2014).
pubmed: 25037633 doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.06.036
Arad, M., Seidman, C. E. & Seidman, J. G. AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart: role during health and disease. Circ. Res. 100, 474–488 (2007).
pubmed: 17332438 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000258446.23525.37
Lee, D. et al. A method to predict the impact of regulatory variants from DNA sequence. Nat. Genet. 47, 955–961 (2015).
pubmed: 26075791 pmcid: 4520745 doi: 10.1038/ng.3331
Moyerbrailean, G. A. et al. Which genetics variants in DNase-seq footprints are more likely to alter binding? PLoS Genet. 12, e1005875 (2016).
pubmed: 26901046 pmcid: 4764260 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005875
Karimzadeh, M., Ernst, C., Kundaje, A. & Hoffman, M. M. Umap and Bismap: quantifying genome and methylome mappability. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e120 (2018).
pubmed: 30169659 pmcid: 6237805
Rosenbloom, K. R. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D670–D681 (2015).
pubmed: 25428374 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1177
Kharchenko, P. V., Tolstorukov, M. Y. & Park, P. J. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1351–1359 (2008).
pubmed: 19029915 pmcid: 2597701 doi: 10.1038/nbt.1508
Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y. & Liu, X. S. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat. Protocols 7, 1728–1740 (2012).
pubmed: 22936215 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.101
Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M. & Brors, B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30, 2811–2812 (2014).
pubmed: 24930139 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393
Leland, M., Healy, J. & Melville, J. Umap: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2018).
McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20436461 pmcid: 4840234 doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630
Kheradpour, P. & Kellis, M. Systematic discovery and characterization of regulatory motifs in ENCODE TF binding experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2976–2987 (2014).
pubmed: 24335146 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1249
Khan, A. et al. JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1284 (2018).
pubmed: 29161433 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1188
Kulakovskiy, I. V. et al. HOCOMOCO: towards a complete collection of transcription factor binding models for human and mouse via large-scale ChIP-seq analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D252–D259 (2018).
pubmed: 29140464 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1106
Jolma, A. et al. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 152, 327–339 (2013).
pubmed: 23332764 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.009
Liu, Y., Sarkar, A., Kheradpour, P., Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Evidence of reduced recombination rate in human regulatory domains. Genome Biol. 18, 193 (2017).
pubmed: 29058599 pmcid: 5651596 doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1308-x
Moore, J. E., Pratt, H. E., Purcaro, M. J. & Weng, Z. A curated benchmark of enhancer–gene interactions for evaluating enhancer–target gene prediction methods. Genome Biol. 21, 17 (2020).
pubmed: 31969180 pmcid: 6977301 doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1924-8
Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer-promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019).
pubmed: 31784727 pmcid: 6886585 doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0538-0
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).
pubmed: 22455463 pmcid: 3339379 doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118
Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Syst. 1695, 1–9 (2006).
Chang, W. et al. shiny: web application framework for R. R package version 1 (2017).
The Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
pmcid: 3037419 doi: 10.1038/75556

Auteurs

Carles A Boix (CA)

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Computational and Systems Biology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Benjamin T James (BT)

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Yongjin P Park (YP)

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Wouter Meuleman (W)

Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.

Manolis Kellis (M)

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. manoli@mit.edu.
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. manoli@mit.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH