Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide in Older Patients: A post hoc Analysis of the REWIND trial.


Journal

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1945-7197
Titre abrégé: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 04 2021
Historique:
received: 09 11 2020
pubmed: 5 2 2021
medline: 28 9 2021
entrez: 4 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dulaglutide reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial. Its efficacy and safety in older vs younger patients have not been explicitly analyzed. This work aimed to assess efficacy and safety of dulaglutide vs placebo in REWIND by age subgroups (≥ 65 and < 65 years). A post hoc subgroup analysis of REWIND was conducted at 371 sites in 24 countries. Participants included type 2 diabetes patients aged 50 years or older with established cardiovascular (CV) disease or multiple CV risk factors, and a wide range of glycemic control. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo as an add-on to country-specific standard of care. Main outcomes measures included MACE (first occurrence of the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from CV or unknown causes). There were 5256 randomly assigned patients who were 65 years or older (mean = 71.0), and 4645 were younger than 65 years (mean = 60.7). Baseline characteristics were similar in randomized treatment groups. Dulaglutide treatment showed a similar reduction in the incidence (11% vs 13%) of MACE in older vs younger patients. The rate of permanent study drug discontinuation, incidence of all-cause mortality, hospitalizations for heart failure, severe hypoglycemia, severe renal or urinary events, and serious gastrointestinal events were similar between randomized treatment groups within each age subgroup. The incidence rate of serious cardiac conduction disorders was numerically higher in the dulaglutide group compared to placebo within each age subgroup but the difference was not statistically significant. Dulaglutide had similar efficacy and safety in REWIND in patients65 years and older and those younger than 65 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33537745
pii: 6127538
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab065
pmc: PMC8063250
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments 0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins 0
Glucagon-Like Peptides 62340-29-8
dulaglutide WTT295HSY5

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01394952']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1345-1351

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Références

Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Sep;8(3):284-291
pubmed: 31124035
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 19;170(6):423-426
pubmed: 30508430
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Oct 2;7(19):e009304
pubmed: 30371301
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130
pubmed: 31189511
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S152-S162
pubmed: 31862755
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;6(1):19-28
pubmed: 25678953
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S111-S134
pubmed: 31862753
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Nov;66(11):1021-32
pubmed: 22925173
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110
pubmed: 31862752
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015 Feb;31(2):204-11
pubmed: 25115916
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Aug;18(8):820-8
pubmed: 27161178
Diabetes Ther. 2014 Dec;5(2):355-66
pubmed: 25424969
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Jun 6;18(1):73
pubmed: 31167654
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2291-2297
pubmed: 29687620
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2576-2580
pubmed: 31373167
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):42-49
pubmed: 28573765
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 01;68(43):961-966
pubmed: 31671084
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89
pubmed: 18784090
World J Diabetes. 2016 Sep 15;7(17):354-95
pubmed: 27660695

Auteurs

Matthew C Riddle (MC)

Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Hertzel C Gerstein (HC)

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Denis Xavier (D)

St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

William C Cushman (WC)

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Lawrence A Leiter (LA)

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Peter J Raubenheimer (PJ)

Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Charles M Atisso (CM)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Sohini Raha (S)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Oralee J Varnado (OJ)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Manige Konig (M)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Mark Lakshmanan (M)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Edward Franek (E)

Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences and Central Clinical Hospital MSWiA, Warsaw, Poland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH