Do stress and anxiety in early pregnancy affect the progress of labor: Evidence from the Wirral Child Health and Development Study.
anxiety
augmentation
epidural
fear of childbirth
labor duration
pregnancy-specific stress
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
revised:
24
10
2020
received:
04
08
2020
accepted:
19
11
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite widespread belief that anxiety causes longer labor, evidence of association is inconsistent. Data gathered as part of a prospective epidemiological longitudinal study were used to investigate associations between antenatal anxiety and pregnancy-specific stress, and labor progression was assessed by duration and use of augmentation. Pregnant primiparous women completed measures for anxiety and pregnancy-specific stress at 20 weeks' gestation (n = 1145). Birth outcome data were extracted from medical records. Regression analyses and a path analysis assessed associations between antenatal anxiety and pregnancy-specific stress, and indices of labor progression (labor duration and augmentation). Anxiety/pregnancy-specific stress were not directly associated with duration of stage 1 labor (HIGH/LOW anxiety: mean difference = 13.94 minutes, SD = 20.66, 95% CI -26.60 to 54.49, P < .50)/(HIGH/LOW pregnancy-specific stress: mean difference = 12.05 minutes, SD = 16.09, 95% CI -19.52 to 43.63, P < .45). However, anxiety/pregnancy-specific stress were associated with epidural use (HIGH/LOW anxiety: 39% vs 31%, P < .042; HIGH/LOW pregnancy-specific stress: 38% vs 29%, P < .001), which was itself associated with longer labor (mean difference: 158.79 minutes, SD = 16.76, 95% CI 125.89-191.68, P < .001). Anxiety and pregnancy-specific stress were associated with increased likelihood of augmentation but these associations were nonsignificant after accounting for epidural, which was itself highly associated with augmentation. However, path analysis indicated an indirect effect linking pregnancy-specific stress, but not general anxiety, to labor duration and augmentation: elevated pregnancy-specific stress led to greater use of epidural, which was linked to both increased rates of augmentation, and increased labor duration. Contrary to general belief, general anxiety and specific pregnancy stress were not directly linked to longer duration of stage one labor. However specific pregnancy stress was associated with epidural use, which in turn was significantly associated with risk of augmentation, and longer stage one labor. Identification of pregnancy-specific stress could help to identify women for whom psychological interventions could improve birth experience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33543770
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14063
pmc: PMC8359214
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1288-1296Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0900654
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0215-36037
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : UK Medical Research Council
ID : G0400577
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
J Affect Disord. 2008 May;108(1-2):101-11
pubmed: 18001841
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Aug 03;12:78
pubmed: 22862846
BJOG. 2012 Sep;119(10):1238-46
pubmed: 22734617
BJOG. 2015 Aug;122(9):1226-34
pubmed: 25958769
Birth. 2003 Mar;30(1):36-46
pubmed: 12581038
Birth. 2004 Mar;31(1):17-27
pubmed: 15015989
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45446
pubmed: 23091594
Women Birth. 2012 Sep;25(3):114-21
pubmed: 21764400
BJOG. 2002 Nov;109(11):1213-21
pubmed: 12452457
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013 Oct;16(5):363-9
pubmed: 23558948
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1288-1296
pubmed: 33543770
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;26(3):325-334
pubmed: 27464490
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;188(4):864-70
pubmed: 12712077
Br J Clin Psychol. 2000 Mar;39(1):35-51
pubmed: 10789027
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Mar;20(3):189-209
pubmed: 17437220
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(5):667-77
pubmed: 19239535
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 11;(7):CD009241
pubmed: 23846738
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:389-91
pubmed: 11983632
BJOG. 2009 Sep;116(10):1350-5
pubmed: 19538412
Psychosom Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;66(5):762-9
pubmed: 15385704
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Sep;27(3):141-6
pubmed: 17214448
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5:CD000331
pubmed: 29781504
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181149
pubmed: 28742162
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e013413
pubmed: 28490549
Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):112-8
pubmed: 15693993