Virtual morphometric method using seven cervical vertebrae for sex estimation on the Turkish population.
Cervical vertebrae
Computed tomography
Sex estimation
Virtual
Journal
International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
14
01
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
28
9
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sex estimation from skeletal remains is crucial for the estimation of the biological profile of an individual. Although the most commonly used bones for means of sex estimation are the pelvis and the skull, research has shown that acceptable accuracy rates might be achieved by using other skeletal elements such as vertebrae. This study aims to contribute to the development of sex estimation standards from a Turkish population through the examination of CT scans from the seven cervical vertebrae. A total of 294 individuals were included in this study. The CT scans were obtained from patients attending the Bakirkoy Training and Research Hospital (Turkey) and the data was collected retrospectively by virtually taking measurements from each cervical vertebrae. The full database was divided into a training set (N = 210) and a validation set (N = 84) to test the fit of the models. Observer error was assessed through technical error of measurement and sex differences were explored using parametric and non-parametric approaches. Logistic regression was applied in order to explore different combinations of vertebral parameters. The results showed low intra- and inter-observer errors. All parameters presented statistically significant differences between the sexes and a total of 15 univariate and multivariate models were generated producing accuracies ranging from a minimum of 83.30% to a maximum of 91.40% for a model including three parameters collected from four vertebrae. This study presents a virtual method using cervical vertebrae for sex estimation on the Turkish population providing error rates comparable to other metric studies conducted on the postcranial skeleton. The presented results contribute not only to the development of population-specific standards but also to the generation of virtual methods that can be tested, validated, and further examined in future forensic cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33544176
doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02510-5
pii: 10.1007/s00414-021-02510-5
pmc: PMC8354927
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1953-1964Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Radiol. 1982 Nov;33(6):681-5
pubmed: 7140151
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Mar;56(2):289-96
pubmed: 21210801
Clin Anat. 1996;9(6):395-400
pubmed: 8915620
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 15;23(20):2180-4
pubmed: 9802158
J Forensic Sci. 2000 Mar;45(2):462-6
pubmed: 10782974
Clin Anat. 2010 May;23(4):399-406
pubmed: 20235180
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Nov;12(9):901-6
pubmed: 3327173
Spine J. 2017 Jan;17(1):135-142
pubmed: 27544049
Br J Nutr. 1999 Sep;82(3):165-77
pubmed: 10655963
Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):419-29
pubmed: 18766348
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995 Jun;97(2):127-33
pubmed: 7653504
Homo. 2007;58(1):75-89
pubmed: 17306261
Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):623-31
pubmed: 16291101
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1988 Feb;3(1):37-47
pubmed: 23915814
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Mar;129(2):365-72
pubmed: 25212127
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Jan;129(1):64-70
pubmed: 16245344
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:588.e1-588.e6
pubmed: 27180249
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jan;59(1):123-6
pubmed: 24111751
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Mar;59(2):301-5
pubmed: 24261847
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 May;238:133-40
pubmed: 24713466
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Apr;261:165.e1-8
pubmed: 26926105
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11
pubmed: 17709072
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jan;58(1):101-3
pubmed: 22563852
Skeletal Radiol. 1997 Aug;26(8):475-81
pubmed: 9297752
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Jan;306:110072
pubmed: 31812819
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56(1):165-9
pubmed: 20735699