Diastolic dysfunction in women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease: Mechanistic insight from magnetic resonance imaging.
Aortic stiffness
Coronary vascular dysfunction
Diastolic function
MRI
Myocardial perfusion reserve
Pulse wave velocity
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 05 2021
15 05 2021
Historique:
received:
25
07
2020
revised:
11
12
2020
accepted:
25
01
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is prevalent in women and is associated with increased risk of developing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, the mechanism(s) contributing to this progression remains unclear. Given that diastolic dysfunction is common in women with INOCA, defining mechanisms related to diastolic dysfunction in INOCA could identify therapeutic targets to prevent HFpEF. Cardiac MRI was performed in 65 women with INOCA and 12 reference controls. Diastolic function was defined by left ventricular early diastolic circumferential strain rate (eCSRd). Contributors to diastolic dysfunction were chosen a priori as coronary vascular dysfunction (myocardial perfusion reserve index [MPRI]), diffuse myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume [ECV]), and aortic stiffness (aortic pulse wave velocity [aPWV]). Compared to controls, eCSRd was lower in INOCA (1.61 ± 0.33/s vs. 1.36 ± 0.31/s, P = 0.016); however, this difference was not exaggerated when the INOCA group was sub-divided by low and high MPRI (P > 0.05) nor was ECV elevated in INOCA (29.0 ± 1.9% vs. 28.0 ± 3.2%, control vs. INOCA; P = 0.38). However, aPWV was higher in INOCA vs. controls (8.1 ± 3.2 m/s vs. 6.1 ± 1.5 m/s; P = 0.045), and was associated with eCSRd (r = -0.50, P < 0.001). By multivariable linear regression analysis, aPWV was an independent predictor of decreased eCSRd (standardized β = -0.39, P = 0.003), as was having an elevated left ventricular mass index (standardized β = -0.25, P = 0.024) and lower ECV (standardized β = 0.30, P = 0.003). These data provide mechanistic insight into diastolic dysfunction in women with INOCA, identifying aortic stiffness and ventricular remodeling as putative therapeutic targets.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is prevalent in women and is associated with increased risk of developing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, the mechanism(s) contributing to this progression remains unclear. Given that diastolic dysfunction is common in women with INOCA, defining mechanisms related to diastolic dysfunction in INOCA could identify therapeutic targets to prevent HFpEF.
METHODS
Cardiac MRI was performed in 65 women with INOCA and 12 reference controls. Diastolic function was defined by left ventricular early diastolic circumferential strain rate (eCSRd). Contributors to diastolic dysfunction were chosen a priori as coronary vascular dysfunction (myocardial perfusion reserve index [MPRI]), diffuse myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume [ECV]), and aortic stiffness (aortic pulse wave velocity [aPWV]).
RESULTS
Compared to controls, eCSRd was lower in INOCA (1.61 ± 0.33/s vs. 1.36 ± 0.31/s, P = 0.016); however, this difference was not exaggerated when the INOCA group was sub-divided by low and high MPRI (P > 0.05) nor was ECV elevated in INOCA (29.0 ± 1.9% vs. 28.0 ± 3.2%, control vs. INOCA; P = 0.38). However, aPWV was higher in INOCA vs. controls (8.1 ± 3.2 m/s vs. 6.1 ± 1.5 m/s; P = 0.045), and was associated with eCSRd (r = -0.50, P < 0.001). By multivariable linear regression analysis, aPWV was an independent predictor of decreased eCSRd (standardized β = -0.39, P = 0.003), as was having an elevated left ventricular mass index (standardized β = -0.25, P = 0.024) and lower ECV (standardized β = 0.30, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
These data provide mechanistic insight into diastolic dysfunction in women with INOCA, identifying aortic stiffness and ventricular remodeling as putative therapeutic targets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33545261
pii: S0167-5273(21)00146-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.064
pmc: PMC8026746
mid: NIHMS1669611
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-7Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL064829
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HV68162
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000064
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R03 AG032631
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL069751
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000124
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL153430
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL064924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : M01 RR000425
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL151266
Pays : United States
Organisme : American Heart Association-American Stroke Association
ID : 18PRE33960358
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL105787
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R00 HL124323
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL125941
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HV68163
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL127262
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01 HV068164
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017 Oct 1;313(4):R322-R329
pubmed: 28794105
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003579
pubmed: 27033835
Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 7;39(10):840-849
pubmed: 29293969
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Oct;105(4):1342-51
pubmed: 18617626
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 May;7(3):510-6
pubmed: 24633782
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:1-6
pubmed: 32320779
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016 Jan 1;310(1):H14-9
pubmed: 26519031
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Aug;241(2):507-32
pubmed: 26117398
Hypertension. 2015 Sep;66(3):698-722
pubmed: 26160955
N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 23;342(12):829-35
pubmed: 10727587
Eur J Clin Invest. 2019 Feb;49(2):e13049
pubmed: 30422317
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):986-992
pubmed: 32458454
Blood. 2017 Jul 13;130(2):205-213
pubmed: 28507082
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:775-80
pubmed: 27394973
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Feb;6(1):78-86
pubmed: 26885495
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;22(3):432-441
pubmed: 31840366
Circ Res. 2019 May 24;124(11):1598-1617
pubmed: 31120821
Circulation. 1978 Mar;57(3):549-56
pubmed: 624164
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):843-50
pubmed: 19433695
Circulation. 2017 Feb 7;135(6):566-577
pubmed: 27881570
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1953-9
pubmed: 15128895
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2013 Sep;3(3):153-60
pubmed: 24282764
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 16;50(16):1570-7
pubmed: 17936156
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Sep;6(9):955-62
pubmed: 23582361
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:48-53
pubmed: 30041981
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 24;20(1):88
pubmed: 30580760
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1767
pubmed: 32019991
Circulation. 2015 Feb 10;131(6):550-9
pubmed: 25552356
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;21(4):402-424
pubmed: 30859669
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;8(4):
pubmed: 25801710
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):684-693
pubmed: 30765035
Clin Cardiol. 2017 May;40(5):300-306
pubmed: 28004395
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3 Suppl):S21-9
pubmed: 16458167
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):874-876
pubmed: 29459474
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:936-939
pubmed: 27589041
Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Sep;3(5):588-95
pubmed: 20543134
World J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 26;8(2):231-9
pubmed: 26981218
Cell Metab. 2015 Feb 3;21(2):183-194
pubmed: 25651173