The use of bevacizumab in the modern era of targeted therapy for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Female
Humans
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Progression-Free Survival
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Survival Rate
Bevacizumab
Meta-analysis
Ovarian cancer
Systematic review
Targeted therapy
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
21
11
2020
accepted:
20
01
2021
pubmed:
7
2
2021
medline:
8
10
2021
entrez:
6
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The optimal systemic therapy strategy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess oncologic outcomes and toxicity of bevacizumab combination treatment in advanced EOC. We conducted an electronic search of all phase 2 and 3 clinical trials involving bevacizumab combination therapy in advanced-stage EOC between 2010 and March 2020, using Embase, Medline, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane for clinical trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their hazard ratios (HR) when available were extracted. Pooled HR were calculated for each efficacy endpoint in the meta-analysis using inverse variance weighted method. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias I (ROB1) tool for randomized controlled trials. Thirty-five studies were included in the qualitative analysis and eight studies in the quantitative synthesis. In the first-line setting, bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy revealed a significant improvement in PFS (pooled HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81) when compared to chemotherapy alone but no significant OS benefit (pooled HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.72-1.06). In the recurrent setting, bevacizumab combinations showed significant PFS (pooled HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.47-0.58) and OS benefits (pooled HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) compared with non-bevacizumab regimens. Rate of bowel perforation was low at 1.24% (range 0-4.2%). Bevacizumab-containing regimens are associated with significant PFS benefit in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. While the difference in OS did not reach statistical significance in the first-line setting, bevacizumab was associated with improved survival in the recurrent setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33546867
pii: S0090-8258(21)00088-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.028
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
601-612Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no personal nor financial conflict of interests to disclose. Several of the clinical trials included in this systematic review were conducted at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.