Quantifying the effects of antibiotic treatment on the extracellular polymer network of antimicrobial resistant and sensitive biofilms using multiple particle tracking.


Journal

NPJ biofilms and microbiomes
ISSN: 2055-5008
Titre abrégé: NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101666944

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 02 2021
Historique:
received: 06 05 2020
accepted: 24 11 2020
entrez: 6 2 2021
pubmed: 7 2 2021
medline: 23 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Novel therapeutics designed to target the polymeric matrix of biofilms requires innovative techniques to accurately assess their efficacy. Here, multiple particle tracking (MPT) was developed to characterize the physical and mechanical properties of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacterial biofilms and to quantify the effects of antibiotic treatment. Studies employed nanoparticles (NPs) of varying charge and size (40-500 nm) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms and also in polymyxin B (PMB) treated Escherichia coli biofilms of PMB-sensitive (PMB

Identifiants

pubmed: 33547326
doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00172-6
pii: 10.1038/s41522-020-00172-6
pmc: PMC7864955
doi:

Substances chimiques

Polymyxin B J2VZ07J96K

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

13

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17186
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S013768/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC-PC_17186
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Bjarnsholt, T. The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. APMIS Suppl. 136, 1–51 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/apm.12099
Mazza, M. G. The physics of biofilms—an introduction. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 49, 203001 (2016).
doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/20/203001
Flemming, H.-C. et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 563–575 (2016).
pubmed: 27510863 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
Boudarel, H., Mathias, J.-D., Blaysat, B. & Grediac, M. Towards standardized mechanical characterization of microbial biofilms: analysis and critical review. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 4, 17 (2018).
pubmed: 30131867 pmcid: 6102240 doi: 10.1038/s41522-018-0062-5
Mah, T. F. Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol. 7, 1061–1072 (2012).
pubmed: 22953707 doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.76
Ceri, H. et al. The Calgary biofilm device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 1771–1776 (1999).
pubmed: 10325322 pmcid: 84946 doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1771-1776.1999
Moskowitz, S. M., Foster, J. M., Emerson, J. & Burns, J. L. Clinically feasible biofilm susceptibility assay for isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 1915–1922 (2004).
pubmed: 15131149 pmcid: 404629 doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1915-1922.2004
Høiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Givskov, M., Molin, S. & Ciofu, O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35, 322–332 (2010).
pubmed: 20149602 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011
Tseng, B. S. et al. The extracellular matrix protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by limiting the penetration of tobramycin. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 2865–2878 (2013).
pubmed: 23751003 pmcid: 4045617
Hunt, B. E., Weber, A., Berger, A., Ramsey, B. & Smith, A. L. Macromolecular mechanisms of sputum inhibition of tobramycin activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 34–39 (1995).
pubmed: 7535039 pmcid: 162480 doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.1.34
Mah, T. F. et al. A genetic basis for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm antibiotic resistance. Nature 426, 306–310 (2003).
pubmed: 14628055 doi: 10.1038/nature02122
Lindsay, J. A. Hospital-associated MRSA and antibiotic resistance—what have we learned from genomics? Int J. Med. Microbiol. 303, 318–323 (2013).
pubmed: 23499479 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.005
Corona, A. & Cattaneo, D. Dosing colistin properly: let’s save ‘Our Last Resort Old Drug. Clin. Infect. Dis. 65, 870 (2017).
pubmed: 29017286 doi: 10.1093/cid/cix388
Bulman, Z. P. et al. Polymyxin combinations combat Escherichia coli harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5: preparation for a post-antibiotic era. MBio 8, e00540-17 (2017).
pubmed: 28743810 pmcid: 5527306 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00540-17
Poirel, L. et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 6, 4 (2018).
doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0026-2017
Yang, Q. et al. Balancing mcr-1 expression and bacterial survival is a delicate equilibrium between essential cellular defense mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 8, 2054 (2017).
pubmed: 29233990 pmcid: 5727292 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02149-0
Zhao, F., Feng, Y., Lü, X., Mcnally, A. & Zong, Z. IncP plasmid carrying colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae from hospital sewage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e02229-16 (2017).
pubmed: 27895009 pmcid: 5278755 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02229-16
Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J. & Turner, R. J. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat. Rev. Micro 11, 371–384 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3028
Bayramov, D. F. & Neff, J. A. Beyond conventional antibiotics—new directions for combination products to combat biofilm. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 112, 48–60 (2016).
pubmed: 27496704 pmcid: 5290225 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.07.010
Pletzer, D., Coleman, S. R. & Hancock, R. E. Anti-biofilm peptides as a new weapon in antimicrobial warfare. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 33, 35–40 (2016).
pubmed: 27318321 pmcid: 5069134 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.016
Barraud, N., Kelso, M. J., Rice, S. A. & Kjelleberg, S. Nitric oxide: a key mediator of biofilm dispersal with applications in infectious diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 21, 31–42 (2015).
pubmed: 25189865 doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140905112822
Otzen, D. E. Biosurfactants and surfactants interacting with membranes and proteins: same but different. BBA: Biomembranes 1859, 639–649 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.09.024
Finnegan, S. & Percival, S. L. EDTA: an antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent for use in wound care. Adv. Wound Care 4, 415–421 (2015).
doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0577
Pandit, S. et al. Low concentrations of Vitamin C reduce the synthesis of extracellular polymers and destabilize bacterial biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2599 (2017).
pubmed: 29317857 pmcid: 5748153 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02599
Jack, A. A. et al. Alginate oligosaccharide-induced modification of the lasI-lasR and rhlI-rhlR quorum sensing systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e02318–17 (2018).
pubmed: 29463534 pmcid: 5923140 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02318-17
Brackman, G. & Coenye, T. Quorum sensing inhibitors as anti-biofilm agents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 21, 5–11 (2015).
pubmed: 25189863 doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140905114627
Pan, M., Zhu, L., Chen, L., Qiu, Y. & Wang, J. Detection techniques for extracellular polymeric substances in biofilms: a review. BioRes 11, 8092–8115 (2016).
doi: 10.15376/biores.11.3.8092-8115
Jennings, L. K. et al. Pel is a cationic exopolysaccharide that cross-links extracellular DNA in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 112, 11353–11358 (2015).
pubmed: 26311845 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503058112 pmcid: 4568648
Billings, N. et al. The extracellular matrix component Psl provides fast-acting antibiotic defense in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003526 (2013).
pubmed: 23950711 pmcid: 3738486 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003526
Franklin, M. J., Nivens, D. E., Weadge, J. T. & Howell, P. L. Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa extracellular polysaccharides, alginate, Pel, and Psl. Front. Microbiol. 167, 1–16 (2011).
Powell, L. C. et al. The effect of alginate oligosaccharides on the mechanical properties of Gram-negative biofilms. Biofouling 29, 413–421 (2013).
pubmed: 23574333 doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.777954
Pritchard, M. F. et al. A low-molecular-weight alginate oligosaccharide disrupts pseudomonal microcolony formation and enhances antibiotic effectiveness. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00762-17 (2017).
pubmed: 28630204 pmcid: 5571347 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00762-17
Gulot, E. et al. Heterogeneity of diffusion inside microbial biofilms determined by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy under two-photon excitation. Photochem Photobio. 75, 570–578 (2002).
doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)075<0570:HODIMB>2.0.CO;2
Sankaran, J. et al. Single microcolony diffusion analysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 5, 35 (2019).
pubmed: 31728202 pmcid: 6841743 doi: 10.1038/s41522-019-0107-4
Waharte, F., Steenkeste, K., Briandet, R. & Fontaine-Aupart, M. P. Diffusion measurements inside biofilms by image-based fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis with a commercial confocal laser scanning microscope. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 5860–5869 (2010).
pubmed: 20639359 pmcid: 2935062 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00754-10
Billings, N., Birjiniuk, A., Samad, T. S., Doyle, P. S. & Ribbeck, K. Materials properties of biofilms—a review of methods for understanding permeability and mechanics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 036601 (2015).
pubmed: 25719969 pmcid: 4504244 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/3/036601
Cao, H. et al. Revealing region-specific biofilm viscoelastic properties by means of a micro-rheological approach. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2, 5 (2016).
pubmed: 28649399 pmcid: 5460257 doi: 10.1038/s41522-016-0005-y
Witten, J. & Ribbeck, K. The particle in the spider’s web: transport through biological hydrogels. Nanoscale 9, 8080–8095 (2017).
pubmed: 28580973 pmcid: 5841163 doi: 10.1039/C6NR09736G
Reighard, K. P., Hill, D. B., Dixon, G. A., Worley, B. V. & Schoenfisch, M. H. Disruption and eradication of P. aeruginosa biofilms using nitric oxide-releasing chitosan oligosaccharides. Biofouling 31, 775–787 (2015).
pubmed: 26610146 pmcid: 4695972 doi: 10.1080/08927014.2015.1107548
Chew, S. C., Rice, S. A., Kjelleberg, S. & Yang, L. In situ mapping of the mechanical properties of biofilms by particle-tracking microrheology. J. Vis. Exp. 4, e53093 (2015).
Zazo, H., Colino, C. I. & Lanao, J. M. Current applications of nanoparticles in infectious diseases. J. Control Release 224, 86–102 (2016).
pubmed: 26772877 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.008
Natan, M. & Banin, E. From nano to micro: using nanotechnology to combat microorganisms and their multidrug resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, 302–322 (2017).
pubmed: 28419240 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux003
Inchaurraga, L. et al. Modulation of the fate of zein nanoparticles by their coating with a Gantrez® AN-thiamine polymer conjugate. Int J. Pharm. X 1, 100006 (2019).
pubmed: 31517271 pmcid: 6733281
Brotons-Canto, A. et al. Evaluation of nanoparticles as oral vehicles for immunotherapy against experimental peanut allergy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 110, 328–335 (2018).
pubmed: 28965967 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.109
Fulaz, S., Vitale, S., Quinn, L. & Casy, E. Nanoparticle-biofilm interactions: the role of the EPS matrix. Trends Microbiol. 27, 915–926 (2019).
pubmed: 31420126 doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.07.004
Jennings, L. K. et al. Pel is a cationic exopolysaccharide that cross-links extracellular DNA in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PNAS 112, 11353–11358 (2015).
pubmed: 26311845 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503058112 pmcid: 4568648
Dengler, V., Foulston, L., DeFrancesco, A. & Losick, R. An electrostatic net model for the role of extracellular DNA in biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 197, 3779–3787 (2015).
pubmed: 26416831 pmcid: 4652055 doi: 10.1128/JB.00726-15
Hiltunen, A. K. et al. Structural and functional dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and biofilm matrix proteins on different clinical materials. Microorganisms 7, 584 (2019).
pmcid: 6955704 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120584
Campoccia, D., Montanaro, L. & Arciola, C. R. A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces. Biomaterials 34, 8533–8554 (2013).
pubmed: 23953781 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.089
Habimana, O., Steenkeste, K., Fontaine-Aupart, M. P., Bellon-Fontaine, M.-N. & Briandet, R. Diffusion of nanoparticles in biofilms is altered by bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 367–368 (2011).
pubmed: 21037304 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02163-10
Ikuma, K., Decho, A. W. & Lau, B. L. T. When nanoparticles meet biofilms—interactions guiding the environmental fate and accumulation of nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol. 6, 591 (2015).
pubmed: 26136732 pmcid: 4468922 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00591
Zhang, T. C. & Bishop, P. L. Density, porosity and pore structure of biofilms. Water Res. 28, 2267–2277 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90042-6
Rosenthal, A. F. et al. Morphological analysis of pore size and connectivity in a thick mixed culture biofilm. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 115, 2268–2279 (2018).
pubmed: 29777596 doi: 10.1002/bit.26729
Chew, S. C. et al. Dynamic remodeling of microbial biofilms by functionally distinct exopolysaccharides. MBio 5, e01536-14 (2014).
pubmed: 25096883 pmcid: 4128364 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01536-14
Forier, K. et al. Transport of nanoparticles in cystic fibrosis sputum and bacterial biofilms by single-particle microscopy. Nanomedicine 8, 935–949 (2013).
pubmed: 23035662 doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.129
Peulen, T. O. & Wilkinson, K. J. Diffusion of nanoparticles in a biofilm. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3367–3373 (2011).
pubmed: 21434601 doi: 10.1021/es103450g
Abdulkarim, M. et al. Nanoparticle diffusion within intestinal mucus: three-dimensional response analysis dissecting the impact of particle surface charge, size and heterogeneity across polyelectrolyte, pegylated and viral particles. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 97, 230–238 (2015).
pubmed: 25661585 doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.01.023
Sahle-Demessie, E. & Tadesse, H. Kinetics and equilibrium adsorption of nano-TiO
doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2011.03.022
Zijnge, V. et al. Oral biofilm architecture on natural teeth. PLoS ONE 5, e9321 (2010).
pubmed: 20195365 pmcid: 2827546 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009321
Bjarnsholt, T. et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 16, 2–10 (2008).
pubmed: 18211573 doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x
Donlan, R. M. & Costerton, J. W. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microb. Rev. 15, 167–193 (2002).
doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002
Peterson, B. W. et al. Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 234–245 (2015).
pubmed: 25725015 pmcid: 4398279 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuu008
Rogers, S. S., van der Walle, C. & Waigh, T. A. Microrheology of bacterial biofilms in vitro: Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Langmuir 24, 13549–13555 (2008).
pubmed: 18980352 doi: 10.1021/la802442d
Lebeaux, D., Ghigo, J.-M. & Beloin, C. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 510–543 (2014).
pubmed: 25184564 pmcid: 4187679 doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00013-14
Huang, J. X. et al. Mucin binding reduces colistin antimicrobial activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 5925–5931 (2015).
pubmed: 26169405 pmcid: 4576126 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00808-15
Walters, M. C. III, Roe, F., Bugnicourt, A., Franklin, M. J. & Stewart, P. S. Contributions of antibiotic penetration, oxygen limitation, and low metabolic activity to tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 317–323 (2003).
pubmed: 12499208 pmcid: 148957 doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.317-323.2003
Percival, S. L., Hill, K. E., Malic, S., Thomas, D. W. & Williams, D. W. Antimicrobial tolerance and the significance of persister cells in recalcitrant chronic wound biofilms. Wound Repair Regen. 19, 1–9 (2011).
pubmed: 21235682 doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00651.x
Zrelli, K. et al. Bacterial biofilm mechanical properties persist upon antibiotic treatment and survive cell death. N. J. Phys. 15, 125026 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/12/125026
Klinger-Strobel, M., Stein, C., Forstner, C., Makarewicz, O. & Pletz, M. W. Effects of colistin on biofilm matrices of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Int J. Antimicrob. Agents 49, 471–479 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.005
EUCAST. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_8.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (2018).
Yang, Q. E. et al. Compensatory mutations modulate the competitiveness and dynamics of plasmid-mediated resistance in Escherichia coli clones. ISME J. 14, 861–865 (2020).
pubmed: 31896787 pmcid: 7031280 doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0578-6
Geddes-McAlister, J., Kugadas, A. & Gadjeva, M. Tasked with a challenging objective: Why do neutrophils fail to battle Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Pathogens 8, 283 (2019).
Connaughton, A., Childs, A., Dylewski, S. & Sabesan, V. J. Biofilm disrupting technology for orthopedic implants: what’s on the horizon? Front. Med. 1, 22 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00022
Powell, L. C. et al. Targeted disruption of the extracellular polymeric network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by alginate oligosaccharides. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 4, 13 (2018).
pubmed: 29977590 pmcid: 6026129 doi: 10.1038/s41522-018-0056-3
Howell-Jones, R. S. Antibiotic use in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University (2007).
Yang, Q. E. et al. Environmental dissemination of mcr-1 positive Enterobacteriaceae by Chrysomya spp. (common blowfly): an increasing public health risk. Environ. Int 122, 281–290 (2018).
pubmed: 30455105 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.021
Bonengel, S. et al. Impact of different hydrophobic ion pairs of octreotide on its oral bioavailability in pigs. J. Control Release 273, 21–29 (2018).
pubmed: 29355620 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.012
Rohrer, J. et al. Mucus permeating thiolated self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 98, 90–97 (2016).
pubmed: 26598209 doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.11.004
Schuster, B. S., Suk, J. S., Woodworth, G. F. & Hanes, J. Nanoparticle diffusion in respiratory mucus from humans without lung disease. Biomaterials 34, 3439–3446 (2013).
pubmed: 23384790 pmcid: 3590854 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.064
Birjiniuk, A. et al. Single particle tracking reveals spatial and dynamic organization of the Escherichia coli biofilm matrix. N. J. Phys. 16, 085014 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/8/085014

Auteurs

Lydia C Powell (LC)

Advanced Therapies Group, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, UK. l.c.powell@swansea.ac.uk.
Centre of Nanohealth, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK. l.c.powell@swansea.ac.uk.

Muthanna Abdulkarim (M)

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. AbdulkarimMF@cardiff.ac.uk.

Joana Stokniene (J)

Advanced Therapies Group, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, UK.

Qiu E Yang (QE)

Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Timothy R Walsh (TR)

Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Katja E Hill (KE)

Advanced Therapies Group, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, UK.

Mark Gumbleton (M)

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

David W Thomas (DW)

Advanced Therapies Group, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, UK.

Articles similaires

Vancomycin Polyesters Anti-Bacterial Agents Models, Theoretical Drug Liberation
Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol
Female Biofilms Animals Lactobacillus Mice
Tumor Microenvironment Nanoparticles Immunotherapy Cellular Senescence Animals

Classifications MeSH