The effects of a preoperative multidisciplinary conference on outcomes for high-risk patients with challenging surgical treatment options: a retrospective study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical Decision-Making
/ methods
Female
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Care Team
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Safety
/ statistics & numerical data
Preoperative Period
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Surgeons
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Challenging surgical treatment option
Patient safety
Preoperative multidisciplinary conference
Shared decision making
Journal
BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 02 2021
06 02 2021
Historique:
received:
30
09
2020
accepted:
14
01
2021
entrez:
7
2
2021
pubmed:
8
2
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Surgical options for patients vary with age and comorbidities, advances in medical technology and patients' wishes. This complexity can make it difficult for surgeons to determine appropriate treatment plans independently. At our institution, final decisions regarding treatment for patients are made at multidisciplinary meetings, termed High-Risk Conferences, led by the Patient Safety Committee. In this retrospective study, we assessed the reasons for convening High-Risk Conferences, the final decisions made and treatment outcomes using conference records and patient medical records for conferences conducted at our institution from April 2010 to March 2018. A total of 410 High-Risk Conferences were conducted for 406 patients during the study period. The department with the most conferences was cardiovascular surgery (24%), and the reasons for convening conferences included the presence of severe comorbidities (51%), highly difficult surgeries (41%) and nonmedical/personal issues (8%). Treatment changes were made for 49 patients (12%), including surgical modifications for 20 patients and surgery cancellation for 29. The most common surgical modification was procedure reduction (16 patients); 4 deaths were reported. Follow-up was available for 21 patients for whom surgery was cancelled, with 11 deaths reported. Given that some change to the treatment plan was made for 12% of the patients discussed at the High-Risk Conferences, we conclude that participants of these conferences did not always agree with the original surgical plan and that the multidisciplinary decision-making process of the conferences served to allow for modifications. Many of the modifications involved reductions in procedures to reflect a more conservative approach, which might have decreased perioperative mortality and the incidence of complications as well as unnecessary surgeries. High-risk patients have complex issues, and it is difficult to verify statistically whether outcomes are associated with changes in course of treatment. Nevertheless, these conferences might be useful from a patient safety perspective and minimize the potential for legal disputes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Surgical options for patients vary with age and comorbidities, advances in medical technology and patients' wishes. This complexity can make it difficult for surgeons to determine appropriate treatment plans independently. At our institution, final decisions regarding treatment for patients are made at multidisciplinary meetings, termed High-Risk Conferences, led by the Patient Safety Committee.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, we assessed the reasons for convening High-Risk Conferences, the final decisions made and treatment outcomes using conference records and patient medical records for conferences conducted at our institution from April 2010 to March 2018.
RESULTS
A total of 410 High-Risk Conferences were conducted for 406 patients during the study period. The department with the most conferences was cardiovascular surgery (24%), and the reasons for convening conferences included the presence of severe comorbidities (51%), highly difficult surgeries (41%) and nonmedical/personal issues (8%). Treatment changes were made for 49 patients (12%), including surgical modifications for 20 patients and surgery cancellation for 29. The most common surgical modification was procedure reduction (16 patients); 4 deaths were reported. Follow-up was available for 21 patients for whom surgery was cancelled, with 11 deaths reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Given that some change to the treatment plan was made for 12% of the patients discussed at the High-Risk Conferences, we conclude that participants of these conferences did not always agree with the original surgical plan and that the multidisciplinary decision-making process of the conferences served to allow for modifications. Many of the modifications involved reductions in procedures to reflect a more conservative approach, which might have decreased perioperative mortality and the incidence of complications as well as unnecessary surgeries. High-risk patients have complex issues, and it is difficult to verify statistically whether outcomes are associated with changes in course of treatment. Nevertheless, these conferences might be useful from a patient safety perspective and minimize the potential for legal disputes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33549032
doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01257-1
pii: 10.1186/s12871-021-01257-1
pmc: PMC7865098
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
39Références
Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R81
pubmed: 16749940
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1163-71
pubmed: 16132330
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2019 Jan;38(3):12-23
pubmed: 30033650
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):326-30
pubmed: 21451401
Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):202-4
pubmed: 25350646
Anaesthesia. 2019 Jan;74 Suppl 1:80-89
pubmed: 30604415
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 Jun 2;79(6):341-343
pubmed: 29894253
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1379-81
pubmed: 24716679
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1636-1655
pubmed: 29442240
Anesthesiology. 1996 Jul;85(1):196-206
pubmed: 8694365
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):530-8
pubmed: 27013123
Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):170-7
pubmed: 12894008
Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Dec;36(4):653-662
pubmed: 30390785
Updates Surg. 2018 Sep;70(3):355-356
pubmed: 30120744
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):311-4
pubmed: 26537628