Ten statements to support nurse leaders implement e-health tools for nursing work in hospitals: A modified Delphi study.
Australia
decision-making
delphi technique
leadership
nursing informatics
patient safety
workflow
Journal
Journal of clinical nursing
ISSN: 1365-2702
Titre abrégé: J Clin Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207302
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
revised:
21
01
2021
received:
14
12
2020
accepted:
27
01
2021
pubmed:
9
2
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
8
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To use expert consensus to develop guidance for nurse leaders implementing e-health tools to support nursing work in hospitals. Nurse leaders are increasingly required to make decisions about the selection, development, implementation and optimisation of e-health tools for nursing work in hospitals. Guidance in this rapidly evolving and complex space is limited. A two-phase modified Delphi study. Phase one involved in-depth interviews with five nursing informatics experts. Analysis used the qualitative framework method, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), to develop statements for an anonymous online Delphi scoring survey. This was distributed using snowball sampling methods to Australian nurse informatics leaders and experts. Final analysis involved synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data. The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. Ten guidance statements to support nurse leaders to implement e-health tools in hospitals were developed from the synthesis of qualitative interview data and 29 experts' responses to the 55-item Delphi response survey. Implementation of e-health tools for nursing work is complex in health settings and requires careful examination of multiple factors and interactions between clinicians, tools, service users and the health organisation. This research proposes ten statements to support nurse leaders with decisions about implementing e-health tools to support nursing work in hospitals. The ten statements developed by this research provide a resource to assist policy and practice decisions about e-tools to ensure they are suited to supporting nursing work. Nurse leaders can use the ten statements for guidance in the selection, development, implementation and optimisation of e-health tools to ensure suitability and adaptation for nursing work in hospitals.
Sections du résumé
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To use expert consensus to develop guidance for nurse leaders implementing e-health tools to support nursing work in hospitals.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nurse leaders are increasingly required to make decisions about the selection, development, implementation and optimisation of e-health tools for nursing work in hospitals. Guidance in this rapidly evolving and complex space is limited.
DESIGN
METHODS
A two-phase modified Delphi study.
METHODS
METHODS
Phase one involved in-depth interviews with five nursing informatics experts. Analysis used the qualitative framework method, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), to develop statements for an anonymous online Delphi scoring survey. This was distributed using snowball sampling methods to Australian nurse informatics leaders and experts. Final analysis involved synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data. The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) checklist.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ten guidance statements to support nurse leaders to implement e-health tools in hospitals were developed from the synthesis of qualitative interview data and 29 experts' responses to the 55-item Delphi response survey.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Implementation of e-health tools for nursing work is complex in health settings and requires careful examination of multiple factors and interactions between clinicians, tools, service users and the health organisation. This research proposes ten statements to support nurse leaders with decisions about implementing e-health tools to support nursing work in hospitals.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
CONCLUSIONS
The ten statements developed by this research provide a resource to assist policy and practice decisions about e-tools to ensure they are suited to supporting nursing work. Nurse leaders can use the ten statements for guidance in the selection, development, implementation and optimisation of e-health tools to ensure suitability and adaptation for nursing work in hospitals.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1442-1454Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O’Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E. M., Colquhoun, H., Grimshaw, J. M., Lawton, R., & Michie, S. (2017). A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science, 12(1), 77.
Australian College of Nursing, H., Nursing Informatics Australia, (2017). Nursing informatics - position statement. Retrieved from HISA: https://www.hisa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Nursing-Informatics-Position-Statement_06082017.pdf?x30583
Bail, K., Davey, R., Currie, M., Gibson, J., Merrick, E., & Redley, B. (2020). Implementation pilot of a novel electronic bedside nursing chart: A mixed-methods case study. Australian Health Review, 44(5), 672-676. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah18231
Bail, K., Merrick, E., Redley, B., Gibson, J., Davey, R., & Currie, M. (2019). "Blind leading the blind": Qualitative evaluation of unanticipated difficulties during nurse testing of a hospital health information system. Collegian, 27(1), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2019.03.004
Bergey, M. R., Goldsack, J. C., & Robinson, E. J. (2019). Invisible work and changing roles: Health information technology implementation and reorganization of work practices for the inpatient nursing team. Social Science & Medicine, 235, 112387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112387
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Callen, J. (2016). Evaluation research studies essential to ensuring health information systems meet the needs of users, including patients. Health Information Management, 45(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358316639457
Cicero, M. X., Brown, L., Overly, F., Yarzebski, J., Meckler, G., Fuchs, S., Tomassoni, A., Aghababian, R., Chung, S., Garrett, A., Fagbuyi, D., Adelgais, K., Goldman, R., Parker, J., Auerbach, M., Riera, A., Cone, D., & Baum, C. R. (2014). Creation and Delphi-method refinement of pediatric disaster triage simulations. Prehospital Emergency Care, 18(2), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2013.856505
Clancy, L., & Happell, B. (2017). Being accountable or filling in forms: Managers and clinicians’ views about communicating risk. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 53(1), 38-46.
Cohen, J. F., Coleman, E., & Kangethe, M. J. (2016). An importance-performance analysis of hospital information system attributes: A nurses’ perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 86, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.010
Cornell, P., Herrin-Griffith, D., Keim, C., Petschonek, S., Sanders, A. M., D'Mello, S., Golden, T. W., & Shepherd, G. (2010). Transforming nursing workflow, part 1: The chaotic nature of nurse activities. Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(9), 366-373. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181ee4261
Darbyshire, P. (2004). ‘Rage against the machine?’: Nurses’ and midwives’ experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00823.x
De Groot, K., Triemstra, M., Paans, W., & Francke, A. L. (2019). Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(7), 1379-1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13919
de Manincor, M., Bensoussan, A., Smith, C., Fahey, P., & Bourchier, S. (2015). Establishing key components of yoga interventions for reducing depression and anxiety, and improving well-being: a Delphi method study. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 15(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0614-7
Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Fabry, D. (2015). Hourly rounding: Perspectives and perceptions of the frontline nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12114
Hackett, A., & Strickland, K. (2019). Using the framework approach to analyse qualitative data: A worked example. Nurse Researcher, 26(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1580
Harvey, C., Willis, E., Henderson, J., Hamilton, P., Toffoli, L., Verrall, C., Blackman, I., & Abery, E. (2016). Priced to care: Factors underpinning missed care. Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(4), 510-526.
Iedema, R., Mesman, J., & Carroll, K. (2013). Visualising healthcare practice improvement: Innovation from within. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
Jylhä, V., Bates, D. W., & Saranto, K. (2016). Adverse events and near misses relating to information management in a hospital. Health Information Management Journal, 45(2), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358316641551
Kilkenny, M. F., & Robinson, K. M. (2018). Data quality: “Garbage in - garbage out”. Health Information Management Journal, 47(3), 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358318774357
Linstone, H. (1978). The Delphi technique. Handbook of futures research. United States of America: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Lipworth, W., Taylor, N., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 530. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530
Mesman, J. (2011). Resources of strength: An exnovation of hidden competences to preserve patient safety. Emma Rowley & Justin Waring A Socio-Cultural Perspective on Patient Safety, 71-89.London: CRC Press.
Scott, I. A., Sullivan, C., & Staib, A. (2019). Going digital: A checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation. Australian Health Review, 43(3), 302-313. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17153
Thangaratinam, S., & Redman, C. W. (2005). The Delphi technique. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 7(2), 120-125.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357.