Out of the lab and into the wild: The influence of portion size on food intake in laboratory vs. real-world settings.

Eating behaviour Ecological validity Food intake Laboratory Portion size Real-world

Journal

Appetite
ISSN: 1095-8304
Titre abrégé: Appetite
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 07 2021
Historique:
received: 16 06 2020
revised: 26 01 2021
accepted: 02 02 2021
pubmed: 9 2 2021
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 8 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

External influences on eating behaviour, such as portion size, have been reliably shown to influence food intake in the laboratory. However, little research has examined whether laboratory settings under or overestimate the effect that external influences have on food intake compared to when studied in the real-world. In Study 1, 60 participants (mean age = 32 years) were randomized to consume a large (200 g) or small (100 g) portion of popcorn under controlled laboratory conditions and during a separate session in their home. Results showed that the effect of portion size on food intake was larger at home (d = 0.97) than in the laboratory (d = 0.56). Furthermore, participants reported feeling more relaxed eating at home compared to the laboratory. In Study 2, we examined whether comparable results were observed in a semi-naturalistic laboratory designed to resemble a home setting. 59 participants (mean age = 28 years) completed the same procedure as Study 1 in a standard and a semi-naturalistic laboratory setting. Although participants reported having higher levels of private self-awareness in the standard laboratory, the effect that portion size had on food intake did not differ between the standard laboratory (d = 0.50) and the semi-naturalistic laboratory (d = 0.49). The impact that external influences on eating, such as portion size, have on food intake in the real-world may be underestimated when studied under laboratory conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33556391
pii: S0195-6663(21)00068-4
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105160
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105160

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N000218/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Thomas Gough (T)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. Electronic address: tomgough@liverpool.ac.uk.

Ashleigh Haynes (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK; Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

Katie Clarke (K)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.

Amy Hansell (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.

Mahrukh Kaimkhani (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Bethan Price (B)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.

Araby Roberts (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Charlotte A Hardman (CA)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.

Eric Robinson (E)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. Electronic address: eric.robinson@liverpool.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH