Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review.
Demographic and Health Surveys
Neonatal deaths
Questionnaires
Stillbirths
Journal
Population health metrics
ISSN: 1478-7954
Titre abrégé: Popul Health Metr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101178411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 02 2021
08 02 2021
Historique:
entrez:
9
2
2021
pubmed:
10
2
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women's retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement. We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module. DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change. DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women's retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement.
METHODS
We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module.
RESULTS
DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change.
CONCLUSION
DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33557845
doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0
pii: 10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0
pmc: PMC7869207
doi:
Types de publication
Historical Article
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e98-e108
pubmed: 26795602
J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Aug 28;33:17
pubmed: 26825676
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):604-616
pubmed: 26794073
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603
pubmed: 26794078
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Aug 1;90(8):604-12
pubmed: 22893744
PLoS Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):e1001080
pubmed: 21918640
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:24011
pubmed: 25843493
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):189-205
pubmed: 24853593
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Nov;2(11):e635-44
pubmed: 25442688
World Health Stat Q. 1985;38(3):289-301
pubmed: 4072245
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168743
pubmed: 28030594
Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):703-16
pubmed: 26794079
Stud Fam Plann. 1989 May-Jun;20(3):147-57
pubmed: 2734811
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 13;7(4):e1000253
pubmed: 20405055
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):120-4
pubmed: 8390117
World Health Stat Q. 1993;46(4):222-6
pubmed: 8017081
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1373-1385
pubmed: 25971224
Notas Poblacion. 1991 Apr;18-19(51-52):11-37
pubmed: 12284928
Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70
pubmed: 24853604
Popul Stud (Camb). 1996 Nov;50(3):433-50
pubmed: 11618376
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1319-30
pubmed: 21496917
Proc R Soc Med. 1961 Dec;54:1089
pubmed: 13875199
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Sep;236:112413
pubmed: 31326779
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e555-e566
pubmed: 32199123
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1602-13
pubmed: 23148108