Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma with and without Nasal Polyposis: A
asthma
biomarkers
nasal polyps
sinusitis
tezepelumab
thymic stromal lymphopoietin
Journal
Journal of asthma and allergy
ISSN: 1178-6965
Titre abrégé: J Asthma Allergy
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101543450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
09
11
2020
accepted:
06
01
2021
entrez:
11
2
2021
pubmed:
12
2
2021
medline:
12
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine implicated in asthma pathogenesis, from binding to its heterodimeric receptor. In the phase 2b PATHWAY study, tezepelumab significantly reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) versus placebo, irrespective of baseline disease characteristics, and improved lung function and symptom control, in adults with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This In this At baseline, NP+ patients had higher blood eosinophil counts, higher FeNO levels and higher serum IL-5 and IL-13 levels than NP- patients. Tezepelumab 210 mg reduced the AAER versus placebo to a similar extent in both NP+ and NP- patients (NP+, 75% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15, 93], n=23; NP-, 73% [95% CI: 47, 86], n=112). Patients treated with tezepelumab 210 mg demonstrated greater reductions in blood eosinophil count and levels of FeNO, IL-5 and IL-13 than placebo-treated patients, irrespective of NP status. Tezepelumab reduced exacerbations and reduced type 2 inflammatory biomarkers in patients with and those without NP, supporting its efficacy in a broad population of patients with severe asthma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine implicated in asthma pathogenesis, from binding to its heterodimeric receptor. In the phase 2b PATHWAY study, tezepelumab significantly reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) versus placebo, irrespective of baseline disease characteristics, and improved lung function and symptom control, in adults with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This
METHODS
METHODS
In this
RESULTS
RESULTS
At baseline, NP+ patients had higher blood eosinophil counts, higher FeNO levels and higher serum IL-5 and IL-13 levels than NP- patients. Tezepelumab 210 mg reduced the AAER versus placebo to a similar extent in both NP+ and NP- patients (NP+, 75% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15, 93], n=23; NP-, 73% [95% CI: 47, 86], n=112). Patients treated with tezepelumab 210 mg demonstrated greater reductions in blood eosinophil count and levels of FeNO, IL-5 and IL-13 than placebo-treated patients, irrespective of NP status.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Tezepelumab reduced exacerbations and reduced type 2 inflammatory biomarkers in patients with and those without NP, supporting its efficacy in a broad population of patients with severe asthma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33568920
doi: 10.2147/JAA.S288260
pii: 288260
pmc: PMC7868291
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
91-99Informations de copyright
© 2021 Emson et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CE, KS, ÅH and GC are employees of AstraZeneca and may have stock options in AstraZeneca. JC received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study, and has received grants and personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Teva Pharmaceuticals, grants from Sanofi and personal fees from Vectura Group outside of the submitted work. JRP is an employee of Amgen Inc., and holds stock and stock options in Amgen Inc. JRP has patents US20180296669A1 and WO201819479A1, Treatment of Asthma with Anti-TSLP Antibody, pending. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Rhinology. 2010 Dec;48(4):420-5
pubmed: 21442078
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 29;370(22):2102-10
pubmed: 24846652
Rhinol Suppl. 2012 Mar;23:3 p preceding table of contents, 1-298
pubmed: 22764607
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):565-72
pubmed: 27393770
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1110-1119
pubmed: 30273510
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Nov;112(5):877-82
pubmed: 14610473
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jul - Aug;5(4):1061-1070.e3
pubmed: 28286156
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Sep;132(3):593-600.e12
pubmed: 23688414
Adv Pharmacol. 2013;66:129-55
pubmed: 23433457
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 13;(1):CD003559
pubmed: 24414989
Nat Immunol. 2002 Jul;3(7):673-80
pubmed: 12055625
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jan 11;14:1-11
pubmed: 33469316
Respir Res. 2020 Oct 13;21(1):266
pubmed: 33050934
Eur Respir J. 2018 Oct 18;52(4):
pubmed: 30139780
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jun;42(3):120-4
pubmed: 20648775
Allergy. 2019 Apr;74(4):743-752
pubmed: 30488542
J Exp Med. 2007 Feb 19;204(2):253-8
pubmed: 17242164
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 21;9:CD010834
pubmed: 28933516
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1638-1650
pubmed: 31543428
J Asthma Allergy. 2016 Mar 14;9:45-53
pubmed: 27042129
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1977 Jan;59(1):17-21
pubmed: 833373
J Immunol. 2008 Aug 15;181(4):2790-8
pubmed: 18684970
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):205-8
pubmed: 21819754
J Clin Immunol. 2008 Mar;28(2):147-56
pubmed: 18049884
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Jan;15(1):57-65
pubmed: 25534623
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 7;377(10):936-946
pubmed: 28877011
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):589-596.e3
pubmed: 30193936
J Immunol. 2005 Jun 15;174(12):8183-90
pubmed: 15944327
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Apr;124(4):326-332
pubmed: 31830587
Clin Transl Allergy. 2020 Jun 26;10:25
pubmed: 32607141
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2011 Jul;3(3):186-93
pubmed: 21738884
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Jan;129(1):104-11.e1-9
pubmed: 21975173