Reliability in the assessment of paediatric somatosensory evoked potentials post cardiac arrest.


Journal

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1872-8952
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100883319

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 04 05 2020
revised: 15 11 2020
accepted: 06 12 2020
pubmed: 12 2 2021
medline: 17 8 2021
entrez: 11 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To measure inter- and intra-rater agreement in the interpretation of cortical somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components following paediatric cardiac arrest (CA) in multi-professional neurophysiology teams. Thirteen professionals blinded to patient outcome interpreted 96 SSEPs in paediatric patients 24-/48-/72-hours following CA. Of these, 34 were duplicates used to assess intra-rater agreement. Consistent interpretations (absent/present/indeterminate) between scientists (who record/identify SSEP components) and neurophysiologists (who provide prognostic SSEP interpretation) were expressed as percentages. Rates of agreement were calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient (K). Unanimous agreement between professionals was present in 40% (95%CI: 28-54%) of the interpreted SSEPs, with a K value of 0.62 (95%CI: 0.55-0.70) based on average agreement. Agreement was similar between neurophysiologists (K = 0.67; 95%CI: 0.57-0.77) and scientists (K = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.54-0.70) but lower in patients < 2 years old (K = 0.23; 95%CI: 0.14-0.33) and in those with poor outcome (K = 0.21; 95%CI: 0.07-0.35). No SSEP was unanimously interpreted as absent and 92% (95%CI: 89-95%) of duplicate SSEPs were interpreted consistently. Despite substantial agreement when interpreting prognostic SSEPs, this was significantly lower in children with poor outcome and of younger age. Clinicians using SSEPs in the intensive care unit should be aware of the inter-rater variability when interpreting SSEPs as absent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33571884
pii: S1388-2457(21)00008-0
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.12.016
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

765-769

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest. Preliminary results of this study were presented at the British Society for Clinical Neurophysiology National Audit, Birmingham, 3rd November 2016.

Auteurs

William M McDevitt (WM)

Department of Neurophysiology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Electronic address: w.mcdevitt@nhs.net.

Laura Quinn (L)

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, UK.

Peter R Bill (PR)

Department of Neurophysiology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Kevin P Morris (KP)

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Barnaby R Scholefield (BR)

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, University of Birmingham, UK.

Stefano Seri (S)

Department of Neurophysiology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Aston Brain Centre, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH