Reliability in the assessment of paediatric somatosensory evoked potentials post cardiac arrest.
Inter-rater reliability
Interobserver variation
Intra-rater reliability
Pediatrics
Prognosis
Somatosensory evoked potential
Journal
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1872-8952
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100883319
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
04
05
2020
revised:
15
11
2020
accepted:
06
12
2020
pubmed:
12
2
2021
medline:
17
8
2021
entrez:
11
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To measure inter- and intra-rater agreement in the interpretation of cortical somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components following paediatric cardiac arrest (CA) in multi-professional neurophysiology teams. Thirteen professionals blinded to patient outcome interpreted 96 SSEPs in paediatric patients 24-/48-/72-hours following CA. Of these, 34 were duplicates used to assess intra-rater agreement. Consistent interpretations (absent/present/indeterminate) between scientists (who record/identify SSEP components) and neurophysiologists (who provide prognostic SSEP interpretation) were expressed as percentages. Rates of agreement were calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient (K). Unanimous agreement between professionals was present in 40% (95%CI: 28-54%) of the interpreted SSEPs, with a K value of 0.62 (95%CI: 0.55-0.70) based on average agreement. Agreement was similar between neurophysiologists (K = 0.67; 95%CI: 0.57-0.77) and scientists (K = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.54-0.70) but lower in patients < 2 years old (K = 0.23; 95%CI: 0.14-0.33) and in those with poor outcome (K = 0.21; 95%CI: 0.07-0.35). No SSEP was unanimously interpreted as absent and 92% (95%CI: 89-95%) of duplicate SSEPs were interpreted consistently. Despite substantial agreement when interpreting prognostic SSEPs, this was significantly lower in children with poor outcome and of younger age. Clinicians using SSEPs in the intensive care unit should be aware of the inter-rater variability when interpreting SSEPs as absent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33571884
pii: S1388-2457(21)00008-0
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.12.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
765-769Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest. Preliminary results of this study were presented at the British Society for Clinical Neurophysiology National Audit, Birmingham, 3rd November 2016.