Safety and effectiveness of everolimus in maintenance kidney transplant patients in the real-world setting: results from a 2-year post-marketing surveillance study in Japan.
Adult
Aged
Cyclosporine
/ administration & dosage
Drug Therapy, Combination
Everolimus
/ administration & dosage
Female
Graft Rejection
/ immunology
Graft Survival
/ drug effects
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Japan
Kidney Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
Tacrolimus
/ administration & dosage
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Everolimus
Maintenance kidney transplant patients
Observational study
Post-marketing surveillance
Renal impairment
Journal
Clinical and experimental nephrology
ISSN: 1437-7799
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Nephrol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9709923
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
08
07
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
pubmed:
13
2
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
entrez:
12
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data on real-world use of everolimus (EVR) in Japanese maintenance kidney transplant (KTx) patients are limited. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of EVR, and identify factors affecting renal impairment. Adult maintenance KTx patients were enrolled within 14 days of initiating EVR. Patient medical data were collected using electronic data capture case report forms at 6 months, 1, and 2 years after initiating EVR, or at discontinuation. All patients receiving EVR in Japan during the surveillance period were enrolled (N = 263). Mean time from transplantation to EVR initiation was 75.7 months. Decreased renal function (31.56%) was the primary reason for initiating EVR. In combination with EVR, the mean daily dose of tacrolimus and cyclosporine could be reduced to ~ 79 and ~ 64%, by 2 years, respectively. Incidences of serious adverse events and adverse drug reactions were 15.97 and 49.43%, respectively. Two-year graft survival rate was 95.82% and low in patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; modification of diet in renal disease) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m No new safety concerns for the use of EVR in adult maintenance KTx patients were identified. Early EVR initiation may be considered in these patients before renal function deterioration occurs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Data on real-world use of everolimus (EVR) in Japanese maintenance kidney transplant (KTx) patients are limited. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of EVR, and identify factors affecting renal impairment.
METHODS
METHODS
Adult maintenance KTx patients were enrolled within 14 days of initiating EVR. Patient medical data were collected using electronic data capture case report forms at 6 months, 1, and 2 years after initiating EVR, or at discontinuation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All patients receiving EVR in Japan during the surveillance period were enrolled (N = 263). Mean time from transplantation to EVR initiation was 75.7 months. Decreased renal function (31.56%) was the primary reason for initiating EVR. In combination with EVR, the mean daily dose of tacrolimus and cyclosporine could be reduced to ~ 79 and ~ 64%, by 2 years, respectively. Incidences of serious adverse events and adverse drug reactions were 15.97 and 49.43%, respectively. Two-year graft survival rate was 95.82% and low in patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; modification of diet in renal disease) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
No new safety concerns for the use of EVR in adult maintenance KTx patients were identified. Early EVR initiation may be considered in these patients before renal function deterioration occurs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33575935
doi: 10.1007/s10157-021-02024-9
pii: 10.1007/s10157-021-02024-9
pmc: PMC8106613
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
Tacrolimus
WM0HAQ4WNM
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
660-673Références
Transplantation. 2007 Apr 27;83(8):1027-34
pubmed: 17452891
Transplant Proc. 2017 Oct;49(8):1724-1728
pubmed: 28923615
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jul;17(7):1853-1867
pubmed: 28027625
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):837-47
pubmed: 21334736
Transplant Proc. 2019 Jun;51(5):1378-1381
pubmed: 31056252
World J Transplant. 2018 Sep 10;8(5):150-155
pubmed: 30211023
Transplant Res. 2013 Jul 16;2(1):14
pubmed: 23866828
Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov;19(11):3018-3034
pubmed: 31152476
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2016 Jan;30(1):3-12
pubmed: 26603484
Transplantation. 2012 Feb 27;93(4):398-405
pubmed: 22245871
Transplantation. 2011 Aug 27;92(4):410-8
pubmed: 21697773
Transplant Proc. 2017 Jan - Feb;49(1):41-44
pubmed: 28104155
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jun;53(6):982-92
pubmed: 19339088
Am J Transplant. 2003 Feb;3(2):178-85
pubmed: 12603213
Transplantation. 2004 Aug 27;78(4):557-65
pubmed: 15446315
Am J Transplant. 2012 Oct;12(10):2744-53
pubmed: 22812414
Am J Transplant. 2011 Apr;11(4):693-7
pubmed: 21446974
Transplantation. 2006 Sep 15;82(5):603-11
pubmed: 16969281
Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006 Jul;2(7):398-404; quiz following 404
pubmed: 16932468
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;11(6):581-588
pubmed: 29779413
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):119-28
pubmed: 25521535