Durability of the parotid-sparing effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in early stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A 15-year follow-up of a randomized prospective study of IMRT versus two-dimensional radiotherapy.
conventional radiation therapy
intensity-modulated radiation therapy
late toxicity
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
patient-reported outcomes
xerostomia
Journal
Head & neck
ISSN: 1097-0347
Titre abrégé: Head Neck
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8902541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
21
12
2020
received:
02
09
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
pubmed:
13
2
2021
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
12
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The durability of improved xerostomia with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with early stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is uncertain. We conducted a long-term prospective assessment of participants treated with IMRT or two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT) in a prior randomized study. Parent study participants (IMRT, n = 28; 2DRT, n = 28) who were free of second malignancy or recurrence were eligible. Long-term radiotherapy-related toxicities were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Long-term patient-reported outcomes were assessed by the six-item xerostomia (XQ) and two European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35). Overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and the rate of symptomatic late complications (SLCs) were estimated for the entire cohort (n = 56). Totally, 21 (IMRT, n = 10; 2DRT, n = 11) patients gave consent and were assessed for an overall median follow-up of 15.5 years. There was significantly less RTOG ≥grade 2 xerostomia with IMRT versus 2DRT (20% vs. 90%; p = 0.001), but no significant difference in XQ scores. Patients in the IMRT arm reported lower mean scores for the "dry mouth" domain of EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (p = 0.02) and showed trends toward better 15-year OS (81.5% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.06), LRFS (70.6% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.38), and DRFS (81.5% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.07). SLCs were more frequent in the 2DRT arm. The parotid-sparing effect of IMRT in NPC treatment is durable, with significantly less physician- and patient-scored xerostomia at 15 years. IMRT results in better long-term survival and fewer SLCs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The durability of improved xerostomia with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with early stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is uncertain. We conducted a long-term prospective assessment of participants treated with IMRT or two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT) in a prior randomized study.
METHODS
Parent study participants (IMRT, n = 28; 2DRT, n = 28) who were free of second malignancy or recurrence were eligible. Long-term radiotherapy-related toxicities were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Long-term patient-reported outcomes were assessed by the six-item xerostomia (XQ) and two European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35). Overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and the rate of symptomatic late complications (SLCs) were estimated for the entire cohort (n = 56).
RESULTS
Totally, 21 (IMRT, n = 10; 2DRT, n = 11) patients gave consent and were assessed for an overall median follow-up of 15.5 years. There was significantly less RTOG ≥grade 2 xerostomia with IMRT versus 2DRT (20% vs. 90%; p = 0.001), but no significant difference in XQ scores. Patients in the IMRT arm reported lower mean scores for the "dry mouth" domain of EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (p = 0.02) and showed trends toward better 15-year OS (81.5% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.06), LRFS (70.6% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.38), and DRFS (81.5% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.07). SLCs were more frequent in the 2DRT arm.
CONCLUSIONS
The parotid-sparing effect of IMRT in NPC treatment is durable, with significantly less physician- and patient-scored xerostomia at 15 years. IMRT results in better long-term survival and fewer SLCs.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1711-1720Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2016;387:1012-1024.
Lee AW, Ngan RK, Tung SY, et al. Preliminary results of trial NPC-0501 evaluating the therapeutic gain by changing from concurrent-adjuvant to induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy, changing from fluorouracil to capecitabine, and changing from conventional to accelerated radiotherapy fractionation in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:1328-1338.
Teo PM, Leung SF, Tung SY, et al. Dose-response relationship of nasopharyngeal carcinoma above conventional tumoricidal level: a study by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study Group (HKNPCSG). Radiother Oncol. 2006;79:27-33.
Kam MK, Chau RM, Suen J, Choi PH, Teo PM. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetric advantage over conventional plans and feasibility of dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:145-157.
Eisbruch A, Ten Haken RK, Kim HM, Marsh LH, Ship JA. Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:577-587.
Kam MK, Leung SF, Zee B, et al. Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4873-4879.
Pow EH, Kwong DL, McMillan AS, et al. Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:981-991.
Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:286-293.
Au KH, Ngan RKC, Ng AWY, et al. Treatment outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in modern era after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Hong Kong: a report of 3328 patients (HKNPCSG 1301 study). Oral Oncol. 2018;77:16-21.
Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, et al. Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:127-136.
Ho JHC. Nasopharynx. In: Halnan KE, ed. Treatment of Cancer. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1982:249-268.
Johnson JT, Ferretti GA, Nethery WJ, et al. Oral pilocarpine for post-irradiation xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:390-395.
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365-376.
Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, et al. Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Acta Oncol. 1994;33:879-885.
Roydhouse JK, Fiero MH, Kluetz PG. Investigating potential bias in patient-reported outcomes in open-label cancer trials. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:457. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6205.
Atkinson TM, Wagner JS, Basch E. Trustworthiness of patient-reported outcomes in unblinded cancer clinical trials. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:738-739.
Heutte N, Plisson L, Lange M, Prevost V, Babin E. Quality of life tools in head and neck oncology. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131:33-47.
Huang TL, Chien CY, Tsai WL, et al. Long-term late toxicities and quality of life for survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E1026-E1032.
Braam PM, Roesink JM, Moerland MA, Raaijmakers CP, Schipper M, Terhaard CH. Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:659-664.
Song T, Fang M, Zhang XB, Zhang P, Xie RF, Wu SX. Sustained improvement of quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity modulated radiation therapy in long-term survivors. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:5658-5666.
Kiang A, Weinberg VK, Cheung KH, et al. Long-term disease-specific and cognitive quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a cross-sectional survey of nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:127.
Li JX, Lu TX, Huang Y, Han F. Clinical characteristics of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in high-incidence area. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:719754.
Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan LL, et al. Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer-success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:377-384.
Fang FM, Tsai WL, Lee TF, Liao KC, Chen HC, Hsu HC. Multivariate analysis of quality of life outcome for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after treatment. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:263-269.
Yu CL, Fielding R, Chan CL, Sham JS. Chinese nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy: association between satisfaction with information provided and quality of life. Cancer. 2001;92:2126-2135.