Effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non-breastfed/mixed-fed infants 6-11 months of age: a systematic review (protocol).


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 02 2021
Historique:
entrez: 13 2 2021
pubmed: 14 2 2021
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prevalence rates of breastfeeding remain low even though the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exclusive breast feeding for the first 6 months of life in combination with appropriate complementary feeding beyond six 6 months of age. There have been several studies that address the implication of drinking animal milk and/or infant formula on children's health and development when breast feeding is not offered during the first year of life. Vast improvements have been made in infant formula design, which may increase its benefits compared with animal's milk. The objective of this review is therefore to synthesise the most recent evidence on the effects of the consumption of animal milk compared with infant formula in non-breastfed or mixed breastfed infants aged 6-11 months. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed the effect of animal milk compared with formula or mixed-fed (breastmilk and formula) on infants aged 6-11 months. The primary outcomes of interest include anaemia, gastrointestinal blood loss, weight for age, height for age and weight for height. We will include randomised and non-randomised studies with a control group. We will use the Cochrane risk of bias tools to assess the risk of bias. We will use meta-analysis to pool findings if the identified studies are conceptually homogenous and data are available from more than one study. We will assess the overall quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This is a systematic review, so no patients will be directly involved in the design or development of this study. The findings from this systematic review will be disseminated to relevant patient populations and caregivers and will guide the WHO's recommendations on formula consumption versus animal milk in infants aged 6-11 months. CRD42020210925.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33579775
pii: bmjopen-2020-046370
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046370
pmc: PMC7883848
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e046370

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

J Pediatr. 1981 Apr;98(4):540-5
pubmed: 7193717
Acta Paediatr. 1999 Dec;88(12):1333-7
pubmed: 10626517
Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2011;67:29-40
pubmed: 21335988
Acta Paediatr. 1995 Sep;84(9):1035-44
pubmed: 8652956
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):123-9
pubmed: 24320992
Nutrients. 2016 May 11;8(5):
pubmed: 27187450
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Aug;55(2):221-9
pubmed: 22569527
J Pediatr. 1990 Jan;116(1):11-8
pubmed: 2295949
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41
pubmed: 22371471
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Aug;66(649):e609-11
pubmed: 27481986
Eur J Nutr. 2013 Sep;52(6):1661-8
pubmed: 23212531
Food Nutr Bull. 2004 Dec;25(4):377-402
pubmed: 15646315
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2019 Mar 25;10:75-102
pubmed: 30908947
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;57(4):505-13
pubmed: 12700611
Acta Paediatr. 2001 May;90(5):492-8
pubmed: 11430706
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Mar;99(3):718S-22S
pubmed: 24452233
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Nov;14 Suppl 4:e12663
pubmed: 30499255
World Rev Nutr Diet. 2013;108:56-62
pubmed: 24029787
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90
pubmed: 26869575
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
pubmed: 19631508
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94
pubmed: 21195583

Auteurs

Aamer Imdad (A)

Department of Pediatrics; Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA imdada@upstate.edu.

Julie Melissa Ehrlich (JM)

School of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Joseph Catania (J)

School of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Emily Tanner-Smith (E)

College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.

Abigail Smith (A)

Health Sciences Library, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Olivia Tsistinas (O)

Health Sciences Library, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta (ZA)

Institute for Global Health and Development, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH