Data Sharing Under the General Data Protection Regulation: Time to Harmonize Law and Research Ethics?
Ethics, Research
Government Regulation
biomedical research
data management
informed consent
Journal
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)
ISSN: 1524-4563
Titre abrégé: Hypertension
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7906255
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
7
9
2021
entrez:
15
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became binding law in the European Union Member States in 2018, as a step toward harmonizing personal data protection legislation in the European Union. The Regulation governs almost all types of personal data processing, hence, also, those pertaining to biomedical research. The purpose of this article is to highlight the main practical issues related to data and biological sample sharing that biomedical researchers face regularly, and to specify how these are addressed in the context of GDPR, after consulting with ethics/legal experts. We identify areas in which clarifications of the GDPR are needed, particularly those related to consent requirements by study participants. Amendments should target the following: (1) restricting exceptions based on national laws and increasing harmonization, (2) confirming the concept of broad consent, and (3) defining a roadmap for secondary use of data. These changes will be achieved by acknowledged learned societies in the field taking the lead in preparing a document giving guidance for the optimal interpretation of the GDPR, which will be finalized following a period of commenting by a broad multistakeholder audience. In parallel, promoting engagement and education of the public in the relevant issues (such as different consent types or residual risk for re-identification), on both local/national and international levels, is considered critical for advancement. We hope that this article will open this broad discussion involving all major stakeholders, toward optimizing the GDPR and allowing a harmonized transnational research approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33583200
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16340
pmc: PMC7968961
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1029-1035Références
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Sep;15(9):523-524
pubmed: 31182850
PLoS Med. 2008 Sep 30;5(9):e183
pubmed: 18767901
Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):657-664
pubmed: 30120573
Eur J Med Genet. 2016 Jun;59(6-7):295-309
pubmed: 27130428
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):4
pubmed: 28122615
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 5;170(5):332-334
pubmed: 30776795
J Med Ethics. 2020 Mar 27;:
pubmed: 32220868
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Jul 17;6:91
pubmed: 31380393
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1929-44
pubmed: 25261970
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Jan 6;16(1):1
pubmed: 31903508
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 16;8(14):e012791
pubmed: 31293194
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jun;28(6):697-705
pubmed: 32123329
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Feb;134:104040
pubmed: 31865055
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):195-200
pubmed: 27145287
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 24;19(2):e47
pubmed: 28235748
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 16;13(8):e1002109
pubmed: 27529422
Science. 2019 Feb 1;363(6426):448-450
pubmed: 30705168
Bioethics. 2016 Nov;30(9):721-732
pubmed: 27628305
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 5;170(5):335-337
pubmed: 30776801
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):22
pubmed: 29370821
Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018
pubmed: 26978244
Science. 2020 Jun 12;368(6496):1190-1192
pubmed: 32467332
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):230-1
pubmed: 25486456
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3069
pubmed: 31337762
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e012788
pubmed: 31450991
Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):575-582
pubmed: 30069638
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1302-1309
pubmed: 31009352