Comparative studies of dual bronchodilation in COPD.
Journal
Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace
ISSN: 1122-0643
Titre abrégé: Monaldi Arch Chest Dis
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9307314
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
26
09
2020
accepted:
11
12
2020
entrez:
15
2
2021
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dual bronchodilation therapy is becoming the cornerstone for the treatment of COPD because the clinical benefits of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are now extensively established. Therefore, it not surprising that a number of LAMA/LABA combinations in a single inhaler have now been approved for clinical use as treatments for patients with COPD. Regrettably, very few head-to-head studies between all of the available LABA/LAMA FDCs have been carried out. This makes choosing the most appropriate FDC difficult. Comparative effectiveness research that also uses conventional meta-analyses to compare different care strategies can help generate useful information. A bidimensional comparative analysis across LAMA/LABA FDCs has suggested constant superiority for tiotropium/olodaterol. However, considering that there is not an equivalent amount of evidence on efficacy outcomes for all LAMA/LABA FDCs, a proper comparison between the different LAMA/LABA FDCs cannot be made yet, and the information available is still rather inconsistent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33586398
doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1625
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
0
Bronchodilator Agents
0
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM