Dosimetric feasibility of neurovascular bundle-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy with periprostatic hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function.
Aged
Erectile Dysfunction
/ prevention & control
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Hydrogels
/ therapeutic use
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Organs at Risk
/ diagnostic imaging
Prostate
/ diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiosurgery
/ methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Rectum
/ diagnostic imaging
Retrospective Studies
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2021
01 Mar 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
4
3
2021
entrez:
15
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aim to test the hypothesis that neurovascular bundle (NVB) displacement by rectal hydrogel spacer combined with NVB delineation as an organ at risk (OAR) is a feasible method for NVB-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy. Thirty-five men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent rectal hydrogel spacer placement and pre-, post-spacer prostate MRI studies were treated with prostate SBRT (36.25 Gy in five fractions). A prostate radiologist contoured the NVB on both the pre- and post-spacer T2W MRI sequences that were then registered to the CT simulation scan for NVB-sparing radiation treatment planning. Three SBRT treatment plans were developed for each patient: (1) no NVB sparing, (2) NVB-sparing using pre-spacer MRI, and (3) NVB-sparing using post-spacer MRI. NVB dose constraints include maximum dose 36.25 Gy (100%), V34.4 Gy (95% of dose) <60%, V32Gy <70%, V28Gy <90%. Rectal hydrogel spacer placement shifted NVB contours an average of 3.1 ± 3.4 mm away from the prostate, resulting in a 10% decrease in NVB V34.4 Gy in non-NVB-sparing plans ( NVB-sparing SBRT with rectal hydrogel spacer significantly reduces the volume of NVB treated with high-dose radiation. Rectal spacer contributes to this effect through a dosimetrically meaningful displacement of the NVB that may significantly reduce RiED. These results suggest that NVB-sparing SBRT warrants further clinical evaluation. This is a feasibility study showing that the periprostatic NVBs can be spared high doses of radiation during prostate SBRT using a hydrogel spacer and nerve-sparing treatment planning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33586999
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200433
pmc: PMC8011244
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydrogels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20200433Références
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May - Jun;8(3):e125-e131
pubmed: 28939353
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S130-4
pubmed: 20171507
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Nov 1;48(4):1069-74
pubmed: 11072164
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 May 1;107(1):143-151
pubmed: 32004582
Front Oncol. 2014 Nov 24;4:321
pubmed: 25505732
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):426-35
pubmed: 15145159
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 2;14(1):136
pubmed: 31375119
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):1468-74
pubmed: 18922652
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1639-43
pubmed: 12655520
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Nov 01;8:256
pubmed: 24180317
Cancer. 2015 Jul 15;121(14):2422-30
pubmed: 25847819
Br J Radiol. 2017 Oct;90(1078):20160877
pubmed: 28749171
Med Dosim. 2016 Winter;41(4):339-343
pubmed: 27745996
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):e198-208
pubmed: 27301047
Med Dosim. 2019 Winter;44(4):356-364
pubmed: 30955990
Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1056):20150658
pubmed: 26463234
Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;59:142-151
pubmed: 27035363
Urology. 2018 May;115:39-44
pubmed: 29174940
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Dec 1;57(5):1285-91
pubmed: 14630263
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Mar 13;8:58
pubmed: 23497695
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 15;59(4):1039-46
pubmed: 15234037
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Sep 1;54(1):101-6
pubmed: 12182979
Radiother Oncol. 2007 Aug;84(2):107-13
pubmed: 17707936
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2227-31
pubmed: 15538237
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(4):909-13
pubmed: 21790224
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan - Feb;8(1):e7-e15
pubmed: 28951089
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 29;13:50-56
pubmed: 30364704
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Nov 15;54(4):1063-8
pubmed: 12419432
Phys Med. 2019 May;61:28-32
pubmed: 31151576
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437
pubmed: 27626365
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Eur Radiol. 2015 Sep;25(9):2665-72
pubmed: 25820537
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):61-68
pubmed: 28710895
J Sex Med. 2019 Sep;16(9):1409-1420
pubmed: 31303575
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 1;52(3):681-93
pubmed: 11849790
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan 1;40(1):129-33
pubmed: 9422568
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Mar 15;46(5):1301-7
pubmed: 10725644
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):617-624
pubmed: 28233591
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Dec 31;21:77-84
pubmed: 32072028