The current status of drug-coated devices in lower extremity peripheral artery disease interventions.
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Drug-Eluting Stents
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Humans
Lower Extremity
/ blood supply
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Recurrence
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency
Drug-coated balloon
Drug-coated devices
Drug-eluting stent
Paclitaxel
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty
Peripheral artery disease
Journal
Progress in cardiovascular diseases
ISSN: 1873-1740
Titre abrégé: Prog Cardiovasc Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376442
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
08
02
2021
accepted:
08
02
2021
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
entrez:
15
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lower limb peripheral artery disease is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Endovascular revascularization is often indicated to improve walking function and to prevent limb loss but restenosis in the treated vessel segment remains a concern that limits the overall effectiveness of the treatment. The most promising technique to prevent restenosis is the use of drug-coated devices, and the most common drug used to coat lower limb balloon angioplasty balloons and stents is paclitaxel. A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2018 reported a possible increase in late mortality attributable to paclitaxel-coated devices. Since then, their use has been brought into question. Here, we present an update of data focusing on the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in lower limb treatment applications. While paclitaxel-coated devices appear to reduce restenosis rates it is still unclear how these surrogate marker improvements translate to direct patient benefits and uncertainty remains as to whether paclitaxel-coated devices confer an increased risk of long-term mortality. Available randomized clinical data is hampered by trial heterogeneity, insufficient power, potential attrition bias and the lack of a plausible mechanistic explanation. An important step forward is that the ongoing trials that were temporarily halted due to the Katsanos et al. report have now both commenced recruitment and may ultimately resolve this clinical dilemma by virtue of their larger sample sizes. Other possible ways forward are the ongoing investigation of alternative anti-proliferative coating agents and use of new sophisticated vascular imaging techniques to more clearly identify patients at risk of restenosis already in the preoperative setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33587964
pii: S0033-0620(21)00016-5
doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.02.002
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-28Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interests.