Ocular surface response of two preservative-free cylcosporine A emulsion eye drops in a mouse model of dry eye.
Administration, Ophthalmic
Animals
Conjunctiva
/ drug effects
Cornea
/ drug effects
Cyclosporine
/ administration & dosage
Disease Models, Animal
Dry Eye Syndromes
/ drug therapy
Emulsions
Eye Proteins
/ metabolism
Female
Fluorophotometry
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Lacrimal Apparatus
/ drug effects
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Ophthalmic Solutions
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
Tears
/ physiology
Transcriptome
Treatment Outcome
Cyclosporine
cationic emulsion
conjunctiva
cornea
dry eye
inflammation
Journal
Current eye research
ISSN: 1460-2202
Titre abrégé: Curr Eye Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8104312
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
17
2
2021
medline:
22
1
2022
entrez:
16
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dry eye (DE) disease is a multifactorial disease in which uncontrolled inflammation can lead to corneal epithelium lesions and symptoms of discomfort. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of two cyclosporine emulsions in a mouse model of DE with corneal epithelium lesions. Six- to 9-week-old female C57BL/6 N mice were housed in a controlled-environment room to induce DE. Following DE development, mice were instilled with: QD 0.1%CsA cationic emulsion (CaEm), BID 0.05%CsA anionic emulsion (AEm), or left untreated. Aqueous tear production and corneal epithelium lesions were assessed throughout the experiment. At the end of the treatment period, left eyes were sampled, fixed, and stained for histology, while the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland of right eyes were sampled for transcriptomic analysis. Corneal lesion scores were reduced by 10.4%, 18.4%, and 10.9% at day 6, 10, and 14, respectively, with CaEm (QD), and by 2.6%, 3.0%, and 5.5% at day 6, 10, and 14, respectively, with AEm (BID). Histology demonstrated that 7 out of 10 DE mice presented moderate to severe ocular lesions, while only 2 and 5 out of 10 mice presented slight to moderate ocular lesions when treated with the CaEm (QD) and AEm (BID), respectively. The transcriptomic profile analysis suggests that a different set of inflammatory genes are modulated in the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland upon DE development. In addition, the two emulsions distinctively modulate the gene expression profile. This study demonstrates that both emulsions were effective at reducing corneal lesions, with the CaEm (QD) being slightly better than the AEm (BID). Interestingly, this study suggests that ocular tissues may not respond similarly to a dry environment and that a different set of genes is modulated by the two formulations in the ocular tissues.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33588656
doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1878228
doi:
Substances chimiques
Emulsions
0
Eye Proteins
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Ophthalmic Solutions
0
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
0
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM