Enabling forward uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in cardiac electrophysiology by reduced order modeling and machine learning.
artificial neural network regression
cardiac electrophysiology
reduced basis method
reduced order modeling
sensitivity analysis
uncertainty quantification
Journal
International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
ISSN: 2040-7947
Titre abrégé: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101530293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
05
02
2021
accepted:
07
02
2021
pubmed:
19
2
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
18
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present a new, computationally efficient framework to perform forward uncertainty quantification (UQ) in cardiac electrophysiology. We consider the monodomain model to describe the electrical activity in the cardiac tissue, coupled with the Aliev-Panfilov model to characterize the ionic activity through the cell membrane. We address a complete forward UQ pipeline, including both: (i) a variance-based global sensitivity analysis for the selection of the most relevant input parameters, and (ii) a way to perform uncertainty propagation to investigate the impact of intra-subject variability on outputs of interest depending on the cardiac potential. Both tasks exploit stochastic sampling techniques, thus implying overwhelming computational costs because of the huge amount of queries to the high-fidelity, full-order computational model obtained by approximating the coupled monodomain/Aliev-Panfilov system through the finite element method. To mitigate this computational burden, we replace the full-order model with computationally inexpensive projection-based reduced-order models (ROMs) aimed at reducing the state-space dimensionality. Resulting approximation errors on the outputs of interest are finally taken into account through artificial neural network (ANN)-based models, enhancing the accuracy of the whole UQ pipeline. Numerical results show that the proposed physics-based ROMs outperform regression-based emulators relying on ANNs built with the same amount of training data, in terms of both numerical accuracy and overall computational efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33599106
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3450
pmc: PMC8244126
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3450Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 02;11(3):e0149342
pubmed: 26934736
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018 Jul;34(7):e2985
pubmed: 29577657
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2004 Jun-Jul;85(2-3):501-22
pubmed: 15142759
Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Apr 17;14:35
pubmed: 25928297
Ann Biomed Eng. 2000 Jul;28(7):755-71
pubmed: 11016413
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Nov;108(2):548-58
pubmed: 21719141
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190345
pubmed: 32448072
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):219-26
pubmed: 11805846
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190381
pubmed: 32448074
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019 Oct;18(5):1415-1427
pubmed: 31025130
Math Biosci. 2019 Sep;315:108228
pubmed: 31325444
Math Biosci. 2005 Sep;197(1):35-66
pubmed: 16009380
Interface Focus. 2011 Jun 6;1(3):396-407
pubmed: 22670209
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Apr;54(4):585-96
pubmed: 17405366
Nat Commun. 2016 May 10;7:11437
pubmed: 27164184
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Sep;291(3):H1088-100
pubmed: 16565318
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017 Dec;33(12):
pubmed: 28474497
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190335
pubmed: 32448070
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190334
pubmed: 32448071
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Sep;57(9):2090-8
pubmed: 20515704
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019 May 1;348:313-333
pubmed: 32863454
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Dec 5;:e3285
pubmed: 31808301
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2021 Jun;37(6):e3450
pubmed: 33599106
Circulation. 2000 Nov 21;102(21):2619-28
pubmed: 11085966
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Aug;59(8):2171-9
pubmed: 22581129
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015 Jun;14(3):489-513
pubmed: 25245816
Med Image Anal. 2020 Apr;61:101626
pubmed: 32000114
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190349
pubmed: 32448065
Chaos. 2002 Sep;12(3):852-892
pubmed: 12779613
Med Image Anal. 2018 Aug;48:43-57
pubmed: 29843078
Math Biosci. 2016 Feb;272:81-91
pubmed: 26723278
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 May;56(5):761-780
pubmed: 28933043
J Comput Phys. 2017 Oct 1;346:191-211
pubmed: 28819329
J Physiol. 2016 Dec 1;594(23):6833-6847
pubmed: 26990229
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 Mar;56(3):491-504
pubmed: 28823052
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 Jan;104(1-3):22-48
pubmed: 20553746
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016 Jul;96:49-62
pubmed: 26611884
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 May;35(5):e3178
pubmed: 30632711
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190558
pubmed: 32448064
Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 14;9:1910
pubmed: 30692934
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Aug;50(8):773-99
pubmed: 22718317
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2012 Jun-Jul;28(6-7):727-44
pubmed: 25364848
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020 Apr 1;361:112762
pubmed: 32565583
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66
pubmed: 9725923
Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 26;10:721
pubmed: 31297060
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):732-740
pubmed: 30847259