Observational study of haloperidol in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antipsychotic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antiviral Agents
/ administration & dosage
COVID-19
/ mortality
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Haloperidol
/ administration & dosage
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Receptors, sigma
/ antagonists & inhibitors
SARS-CoV-2
Survival Rate
Sigma-1 Receptor
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
01
10
2020
accepted:
01
02
2021
entrez:
19
2
2021
pubmed:
20
2
2021
medline:
2
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Haloperidol, a widely used antipsychotic, has been suggested as potentially useful for patients with COVID-19 on the grounds of its in-vitro antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2, possibly through sigma-1 receptor antagonist effect. We examined the associations of haloperidol use with intubation or death and time to discharge home among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Greater Paris University hospitals. Study baseline was defined as the date of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was a composite of intubation or death and the secondary endpoint was discharge home among survivors in time-to-event analyses. In the primary analyses, we compared these two outcomes between patients receiving and not receiving haloperidol using univariate Cox regression models in matched analytic samples based on patient characteristics and other psychotropic medications. Sensitivity analyses included propensity score analyses with inverse probability weighting and multivariable Cox regression models. Of 15,121 adult inpatients with a positive COVID-19 PT-PCR test, 39 patients (0.03%) received haloperidol within the first 48 hours of admission. Over a mean follow-up of 13.8 days (SD = 17.9), 2,024 patients (13.4%) had a primary end-point event and 10,179 patients (77.6%) were discharged home at the time of study end on May 1st. The primary endpoint occurred in 9 patients (23.1%) who received haloperidol and 2,015 patients (13.4%) who did not. The secondary endpoint of discharge home occurred in 16 patients (61.5%) who received haloperidol and 9,907 patients (85.8%) who did not. There were no significant associations between haloperidol use and the primary (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.62, p = 0.531) and secondary (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.28, p = 0.355) endpoints. Results were similar in multiple sensitivity analyses. Findings from this multicenter observational study suggest that haloperidol use prescribed at a mean dose of 4.5 mg per day (SD = 5.2) for a mean duration of 8.4 days (SD = 7.2) may not be associated with risk of intubation or death, or with time to discharge home, among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Haloperidol, a widely used antipsychotic, has been suggested as potentially useful for patients with COVID-19 on the grounds of its in-vitro antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2, possibly through sigma-1 receptor antagonist effect.
METHODS
We examined the associations of haloperidol use with intubation or death and time to discharge home among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Greater Paris University hospitals. Study baseline was defined as the date of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was a composite of intubation or death and the secondary endpoint was discharge home among survivors in time-to-event analyses. In the primary analyses, we compared these two outcomes between patients receiving and not receiving haloperidol using univariate Cox regression models in matched analytic samples based on patient characteristics and other psychotropic medications. Sensitivity analyses included propensity score analyses with inverse probability weighting and multivariable Cox regression models.
RESULTS
Of 15,121 adult inpatients with a positive COVID-19 PT-PCR test, 39 patients (0.03%) received haloperidol within the first 48 hours of admission. Over a mean follow-up of 13.8 days (SD = 17.9), 2,024 patients (13.4%) had a primary end-point event and 10,179 patients (77.6%) were discharged home at the time of study end on May 1st. The primary endpoint occurred in 9 patients (23.1%) who received haloperidol and 2,015 patients (13.4%) who did not. The secondary endpoint of discharge home occurred in 16 patients (61.5%) who received haloperidol and 9,907 patients (85.8%) who did not. There were no significant associations between haloperidol use and the primary (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.62, p = 0.531) and secondary (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.28, p = 0.355) endpoints. Results were similar in multiple sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
Findings from this multicenter observational study suggest that haloperidol use prescribed at a mean dose of 4.5 mg per day (SD = 5.2) for a mean duration of 8.4 days (SD = 7.2) may not be associated with risk of intubation or death, or with time to discharge home, among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33606790
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247122
pii: PONE-D-20-30929
pmc: PMC7895415
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antipsychotic Agents
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Receptors, sigma
0
Haloperidol
J6292F8L3D
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0247122Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: NH has received personal fees and non-financial support from Lundbeck, outside the submitted work. FL has received speaker and consulting fees from Janssen-Cilag, Euthérapie-Servier, and Lundbeck, outside the submitted work. CL reports personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. GA reports personal fees from Pfizer, Pierre Fabre and Lundbeck, outside the submitted work. Other authors declare no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Nov 25;415(3):519-25
pubmed: 22079628
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Aug;135:110138
pubmed: 32442893
J Stat Softw. 2018 Apr;84:
pubmed: 30450020
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1417-1421
pubmed: 32665655
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
Addiction. 2011 Oct;106(10):1871-2
pubmed: 21917042
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;26(9):5199-5212
pubmed: 33536545
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;87(10):3766-3775
pubmed: 33608891
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):193-201
pubmed: 32370982
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2411-2418
pubmed: 32379955
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60
pubmed: 10955408
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):170-178
pubmed: 32423368
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934
pubmed: 32164834
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):112-8
pubmed: 22039212
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):846-848
pubmed: 32125452
Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500):208-211
pubmed: 32404476
Neurochem Int. 2017 May;105:21-31
pubmed: 28188803
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1
pubmed: 23849158
medRxiv. 2020 Apr 28;:
pubmed: 32511467
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7816):459-468
pubmed: 32353859
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:280-286
pubmed: 30665181
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 16;9(3):e17934
pubmed: 33724196