Prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label trial, designed to evaluate the best timing of closure of the temporary ileostomy (early versus late) in patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and with indication for adjuvant chemotherapy: the STOMAD (STOMa closure before or after ADjuvant therapy) randomised controlled trial.
chemotherapy
colorectal surgery
quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 02 2021
19 02 2021
Historique:
entrez:
20
2
2021
pubmed:
21
2
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Temporary ileostomy is a valuable aid in reducing the severity of complications related to rectal cancer surgery. However, it is still unclear what is the best timing of its closure in relation to the feasibility of an adjuvant treatment, especially considering patient-reported outcomes and health system costs. The aim of the study is to compare the results of an early versus late closure strategy in patients with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for rectal cancer. This is a prospective multicentre randomised trial, sponsored by Rete Oncologica Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta (Oncology Network of Piedmont and Aosta Valley-Italy). Patients undergone to rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy, aged >18 years, without evidence of anastomotic leak and with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy will be enrolled in 28 Network centres. An early closure strategy (between 30 and 40 days from rectal surgery) will be compared with a late one (after the end of adjuvant therapy). Primary endpoint will be the compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy with and without ileostomy. Complications associated with stoma closure as well as quality of life, costs and oncological outcomes will be assessed as secondary endpoints. The trial will engage the Network professional teams in a common effort to improve the treatment of rectal cancer by ensuring the best results in relation to the most correct use of resources. It will take into consideration both the patients' point of view (patient-reported outcome) and the health system perspective (costs analysis). The study has been approved by the Ethical Review Board of Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital in Turin (Italy). The results of the study will be disseminated by the Network website, medical conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals. NCT04372992.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33608405
pii: bmjopen-2020-044692
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044692
pmc: PMC7896613
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04372992']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e044692Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88
pubmed: 22503032
Br J Surg. 2019 Apr;106(5):645-652
pubmed: 30706439
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Apr;59(4):281-90
pubmed: 26953986
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD006878
pubmed: 20464746
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(7):501-508
pubmed: 30112948
JAMA. 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2335-42
pubmed: 21642686
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Dec;23(12):1207-12
pubmed: 18685854
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):69-76
pubmed: 30911920
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jun;24(6):711-23
pubmed: 19221766
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Mar;59(3):194-200
pubmed: 26855393
Br J Surg. 2008 Jun;95(6):693-8
pubmed: 18446781
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1356-1362
pubmed: 24718885
BMC Cancer. 2015 Feb 18;15:62
pubmed: 25884851
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(3):266-9
pubmed: 24249401
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):284-290
pubmed: 27322187
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jan;14(1):74-81
pubmed: 15656851