Gene expression in tonsils in swine following infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.


Journal

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 08 11 2019
accepted: 02 02 2021
entrez: 23 2 2021
pubmed: 24 2 2021
medline: 7 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a threat to pig production worldwide. Our objective was to understand mechanisms of persistence of PRRS virus (PRRSV) in tonsil. Transcriptome data from tonsil samples collected at 42 days post infection (dpi) were generated by RNA-seq and NanoString on 51 pigs that were selected to contrast the two PRRSV isolates used, NVSL and KS06, high and low tonsil viral level at 42 dpi, and the favorable and unfavorable genotypes at a genetic marker (WUR) for the putative PRRSV resistance gene GBP5. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) differed markedly between models with and without accounting for cell-type enrichments (CE) in the samples that were predicted from the RNA-seq data. This indicates that differences in cell composition in tissues that consist of multiple cell types, such as tonsil, can have a large impact on observed differences in gene expression. Based on both the NanoString and the RNA-seq data, KS06-infected pigs showed greater activation, or less inhibition, of immune response in tonsils at 42 dpi than NVSL-infected pigs, with and without accounting for CE. This suggests that the NVSL virus may be better than the KS06 virus at evading host immune response and persists in tonsils by weakening, or preventing, host immune responses. Pigs with high viral levels showed larger CE of immune cells than low viral level pigs, potentially to trigger stronger immune responses. Presence of high tonsil virus was associated with a stronger immune response, especially innate immune response through interferon signaling, but these differences were not significant when accounting for CE. Genotype at WUR was associated with different effects on immune response in tonsils of pigs during the persistence stage, depending on viral isolate and tonsil viral level. Results of this study provide insights into the effects of PRRSV isolate, tonsil viral level, and WUR genotype on host immune response and into potential mechanisms of PRRSV persistence in tonsils that could be targeted to improve strategies to reduce viral rebreaks. Finally, to understand transcriptome responses in tissues that consist of multiple cell types, it is important to consider differences in cell composition.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a threat to pig production worldwide. Our objective was to understand mechanisms of persistence of PRRS virus (PRRSV) in tonsil. Transcriptome data from tonsil samples collected at 42 days post infection (dpi) were generated by RNA-seq and NanoString on 51 pigs that were selected to contrast the two PRRSV isolates used, NVSL and KS06, high and low tonsil viral level at 42 dpi, and the favorable and unfavorable genotypes at a genetic marker (WUR) for the putative PRRSV resistance gene GBP5.
RESULTS RESULTS
The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) differed markedly between models with and without accounting for cell-type enrichments (CE) in the samples that were predicted from the RNA-seq data. This indicates that differences in cell composition in tissues that consist of multiple cell types, such as tonsil, can have a large impact on observed differences in gene expression. Based on both the NanoString and the RNA-seq data, KS06-infected pigs showed greater activation, or less inhibition, of immune response in tonsils at 42 dpi than NVSL-infected pigs, with and without accounting for CE. This suggests that the NVSL virus may be better than the KS06 virus at evading host immune response and persists in tonsils by weakening, or preventing, host immune responses. Pigs with high viral levels showed larger CE of immune cells than low viral level pigs, potentially to trigger stronger immune responses. Presence of high tonsil virus was associated with a stronger immune response, especially innate immune response through interferon signaling, but these differences were not significant when accounting for CE. Genotype at WUR was associated with different effects on immune response in tonsils of pigs during the persistence stage, depending on viral isolate and tonsil viral level.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results of this study provide insights into the effects of PRRSV isolate, tonsil viral level, and WUR genotype on host immune response and into potential mechanisms of PRRSV persistence in tonsils that could be targeted to improve strategies to reduce viral rebreaks. Finally, to understand transcriptome responses in tissues that consist of multiple cell types, it is important to consider differences in cell composition.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33618723
doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02785-1
pii: 10.1186/s12917-021-02785-1
pmc: PMC7901068
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

88

Subventions

Organisme : National Pork Board
ID : 12-061
Organisme : National Pork Board (US)
ID : 14-223
Organisme : USDA-NIFA
ID : 2013-68004-20362
Organisme : Genome Canada
ID : .

Références

Anim Health Res Rev. 2003 Dec;4(2):143-55
pubmed: 15134296
J Virol. 2000 Nov;74(22):10834-7
pubmed: 11044133
Res Vet Sci. 2016 Feb;104:117-22
pubmed: 26850549
Nat Methods. 2013 Dec;10(12):1177-84
pubmed: 24185837
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017 Jun;36(2):195-198
pubmed: 28667366
J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 7;278(6):4151-9
pubmed: 12454018
Bioinformatics. 2014 Feb 15;30(4):523-30
pubmed: 24336805
J Immunol. 2013 May 1;190(9):4685-91
pubmed: 23536632
J Immunol. 2003 Mar 15;170(6):2904-11
pubmed: 12626541
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 20;48(1):43
pubmed: 27324857
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):16-38
pubmed: 28177360
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1999 Nov 30;71(3-4):257-62
pubmed: 10587305
J Leukoc Biol. 2008 Jun;83(6):1309-22
pubmed: 18347074
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jan 11;11:22
pubmed: 20064247
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Sep 3;43(15):e97
pubmed: 25925576
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Blood. 2014 May 1;123(18):2759-67
pubmed: 24585776
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017 Nov;1864(11 Pt B):2071-2081
pubmed: 28624438
BMC Genomics. 2015 May 28;16:412
pubmed: 26016888
Nat Immunol. 2010 Feb;11(2):141-7
pubmed: 19946272
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Nov 16;44(20):e151
pubmed: 27471031
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Viral Immunol. 2010 Apr;23(2):127-34
pubmed: 20373993
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2001 Oct;82(3-4):165-82
pubmed: 11587732
Vet Microbiol. 1997 Apr;55(1-4):231-40
pubmed: 9220618
Immunogenetics. 2011 Jul;63(7):437-48
pubmed: 21380581
J Gen Virol. 2013 Oct;94(Pt 10):2141-2163
pubmed: 23939974
Crit Rev Immunol. 2004;24(1):1-37
pubmed: 14995912
Immunology. 1996 Sep;89(1):76-83
pubmed: 8911143
Allergy. 2018 Jan;73(1):125-136
pubmed: 28745029
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1998 Jul;18(7):485-90
pubmed: 9712364
Virology. 2018 Nov;524:78-89
pubmed: 30165309
Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Jun;33(12):2388-401
pubmed: 23572561
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jun;90(6):1733-46
pubmed: 22205662
BMC Proc. 2011 Jun 03;5 Suppl 4:S30
pubmed: 21645311
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e83567
pubmed: 24358295
Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 03;15(2):R29
pubmed: 24485249
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Jul 1;142:16-29
pubmed: 28606362
Viral Immunol. 2010 Oct;23(5):457-66
pubmed: 20883160
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
J Virol. 2010 Sep;84(17):8700-11
pubmed: 20554771
J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):536-547
pubmed: 30496411
Int Immunol. 2008 Sep;20(9):1181-7
pubmed: 18635581
BMC Genomics. 2019 May 7;20(1):344
pubmed: 31064321
Immunity. 2008 Jan;28(1):64-74
pubmed: 18191595
Trends Cell Biol. 2005 Mar;15(3):163-71
pubmed: 15752980
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559
pubmed: 19114008
Anim Health Res Rev. 2008 Jun;9(1):59-69
pubmed: 18348741
Oncogene. 2013 Mar 21;32(12):1497-507
pubmed: 22614019
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
J Exp Med. 2010 Mar 15;207(3):623-35
pubmed: 20156974
Virus Res. 2010 Dec;154(1-2):123-32
pubmed: 20659507
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Dec 27;167(3-4):638-50
pubmed: 24120935
J Leukoc Biol. 1994 Oct;56(4):507-13
pubmed: 7930948
Nature. 2017 May 25;545(7655):505-509
pubmed: 28514442
Genome Biol. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):220
pubmed: 29141660

Auteurs

Qian Dong (Q)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Joan K Lunney (JK)

USDA, ARS, BARC, APDL, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.

Kyu-Sang Lim (KS)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Yet Nguyen (Y)

Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Andrew S Hess (AS)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Hamid Beiki (H)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Raymond R R Rowland (RRR)

College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.

Kristen Walker (K)

USDA, ARS, BARC, APDL, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.

James M Reecy (JM)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Christopher K Tuggle (CK)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.

Jack C M Dekkers (JCM)

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA. jdekkers@iastate.edu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH