Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach.
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Stents
Ureter
Journal
International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
ISSN: 1677-6119
Titre abrégé: Int Braz J Urol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101158091
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
24
06
2020
accepted:
22
08
2020
entrez:
23
2
2021
pubmed:
24
2
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe our experience in the management of retained encrusted ureteral stents using a single session combined endourological approach. Patients with retained encrusted ureteral stents who had been submitted to a single session combined endourological approach from June 2010 to June 2018 were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided according to the Forgotten-Encrusted-Calcified (FECal) classification. The stone burden, surgical intervention, number of interventions until stone free status, operation time, hospital stay, complications, stone analysis, and stone-free rate were compared between groups. ANOVA was used to compare numerical variables, and the Mann-Whitney or Chi-square test to compare categorical variables between groups. We evaluated 50 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.4 years (mean±SD). The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, laterality, BMI, comorbidities, ASA, reason for stent passage, and indwelling time. The stone burden was higher for grades IV and V (p=0.027). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was the most common procedure (p=0.004) for grades IV and V. The number of procedures until the patients were stone-free was 1.92±1.40, and the hospital stay (4.2±2.5 days), complications (22%), and stone analysis (66% calcium oxalate) were similar between groups. The stone-free rate was lower in grades III to V (60%, 54.5%, and 50%). The endoscopic combined approach in the supine position is a safe and feasible technique that allows removal of retained and encrusted stents in a single procedure. The FECal classification seems to be useful for surgical planning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33621006
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0511
pii: IBJU20200511
pmc: PMC7993973
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
574-583Informations de copyright
Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
J Endourol. 2013 Jul;27(7):845-9
pubmed: 23373958
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):350-353
pubmed: 29385812
Urology. 2016 Nov;97:51-55
pubmed: 27421780
Asian J Urol. 2015 Oct;2(4):194-201
pubmed: 29264145
Arab J Urol. 2019 May 15;17(2):132-137
pubmed: 31285925
Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):246-55
pubmed: 22487016
J Endourol. 2014 Oct;28(10):1188-91
pubmed: 24745371
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):523-9
pubmed: 22160282
J Urol. 1998 Dec;160(6 Pt 1):1975-8
pubmed: 9817303
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1437-42
pubmed: 19698053
J Endourol. 2007 May;21(5):499-503
pubmed: 17523902
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Jan 18;90(4):265-269
pubmed: 30655638
J Urol. 1967 May;97(5):840-4
pubmed: 6025928
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;51(10):922-7
pubmed: 24433773
J Urol. 1995 Jun;153(6):1817-9
pubmed: 7752325
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):542-7
pubmed: 21168868
Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):196-202
pubmed: 18262711
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1393-403
pubmed: 18715696
Urology. 2001 Oct;58(4):526-31
pubmed: 11597531
J Endourol. 2009 Mar;23(3):409-15
pubmed: 19265471
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Feb 26;55(3):
pubmed: 30813602
Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):164-70
pubmed: 21570174
Mymensingh Med J. 2018 Jan;27(1):149-158
pubmed: 29459607
J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):628-32
pubmed: 17638560