Understanding the roles of community health workers in improving perinatal health equity in rural Uttar Pradesh, India: a qualitative study.
Community health workers
Health equity
India
Maternal and newborn health
Qualitative research
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 02 2021
23 02 2021
Historique:
received:
03
11
2020
accepted:
09
02
2021
entrez:
24
2
2021
pubmed:
25
2
2021
medline:
8
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite substantial reductions in perinatal deaths (stillbirths and early neonatal deaths), India's perinatal mortality rates remain high, both nationally and in individual states. Rates are highest among disadvantaged socio-economic groups. To address this, India's National Health Mission has trained community health workers called Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) to counsel and support women by visiting them at home before and after childbirth. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the roles of ASHAs' home visits in improving equity in perinatal health between socio-economic position groups in rural Uttar Pradesh (UP), India. We conducted social mapping in four villages of two districts in UP, followed by three focus group discussions in each village (12 in total) with ASHAs and women who had recently given birth belonging to 'higher' and 'lower' socio-economic position groups (n = 134 participants). We analysed the data in NVivo and Dedoose using a thematic framework approach. Home visits enabled ASHAs to build trusting relationships with women, offer information about health services, schemes and preventive care, and provide practical support for accessing maternity care. This helped many women and families prepare for birth and motivated them to deliver in health facilities. In particular, ASHAs encouraged women who were poorer, less educated or from lower caste groups to give birth in public Community Health Centres (CHCs). However, women who gave birth at CHCs often experienced insufficient emergency obstetric care, mistreatment from staff, indirect costs, lack of medicines, and referrals to higher-level facilities when complications occurred. Referrals often led to delays and higher fees that placed the greatest burden on families who were considered of lower socio-economic position or living in remote areas, and increased their risk of experiencing perinatal loss. The study found that ASHAs built relationships, counselled and supported many pregnant women of lower socio-economic positions. Ongoing inequities in health facility births and perinatal mortality were perpetuated by overlapping contextual issues beyond the ASHAs' purview. Supporting ASHAs' integration with community organisations and health system strategies more broadly is needed to address these issues and optimise pathways between equity in intervention coverage, processes and perinatal health outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite substantial reductions in perinatal deaths (stillbirths and early neonatal deaths), India's perinatal mortality rates remain high, both nationally and in individual states. Rates are highest among disadvantaged socio-economic groups. To address this, India's National Health Mission has trained community health workers called Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) to counsel and support women by visiting them at home before and after childbirth. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the roles of ASHAs' home visits in improving equity in perinatal health between socio-economic position groups in rural Uttar Pradesh (UP), India.
METHODS
We conducted social mapping in four villages of two districts in UP, followed by three focus group discussions in each village (12 in total) with ASHAs and women who had recently given birth belonging to 'higher' and 'lower' socio-economic position groups (n = 134 participants). We analysed the data in NVivo and Dedoose using a thematic framework approach.
RESULTS
Home visits enabled ASHAs to build trusting relationships with women, offer information about health services, schemes and preventive care, and provide practical support for accessing maternity care. This helped many women and families prepare for birth and motivated them to deliver in health facilities. In particular, ASHAs encouraged women who were poorer, less educated or from lower caste groups to give birth in public Community Health Centres (CHCs). However, women who gave birth at CHCs often experienced insufficient emergency obstetric care, mistreatment from staff, indirect costs, lack of medicines, and referrals to higher-level facilities when complications occurred. Referrals often led to delays and higher fees that placed the greatest burden on families who were considered of lower socio-economic position or living in remote areas, and increased their risk of experiencing perinatal loss.
CONCLUSIONS
The study found that ASHAs built relationships, counselled and supported many pregnant women of lower socio-economic positions. Ongoing inequities in health facility births and perinatal mortality were perpetuated by overlapping contextual issues beyond the ASHAs' purview. Supporting ASHAs' integration with community organisations and health system strategies more broadly is needed to address these issues and optimise pathways between equity in intervention coverage, processes and perinatal health outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33622337
doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01406-5
pii: 10.1186/s12939-021-01406-5
pmc: PMC7901073
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
63Références
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 25;17(1):29
pubmed: 30909926
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):847-52
pubmed: 24347709
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:55-65
pubmed: 28199860
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Sep;27(6):449-66
pubmed: 22155589
Health Econ. 2002 Dec;11(8):659-66
pubmed: 12457367
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:48-57
pubmed: 23849238
PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 7;16(3):e1002759
pubmed: 30845199
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Dec 09;13:95
pubmed: 26646109
Lancet. 2018 Apr 14;391(10129):1538-1548
pubmed: 29395268
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1272223
pubmed: 28222653
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):653
pubmed: 30134881
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):755-8
pubmed: 22493477
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):541-54
pubmed: 22279082
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 29;15:75
pubmed: 25886165
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46
pubmed: 23683640
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 25;13 Suppl 1:56
pubmed: 26790620
Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70
pubmed: 24853604
Int Health. 2010 Mar;2(1):25-35
pubmed: 24037047
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 22;15:814
pubmed: 26297314
Lancet. 2007 Jun 23;369(9579):2121-31
pubmed: 17586307
Glob Health Promot. 2009;Suppl 1:23-7
pubmed: 19477825
PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847
pubmed: 26126110
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(2):249-58
pubmed: 25315837
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug 11;9:34
pubmed: 19671156
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):698
pubmed: 28893214
Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1151-62
pubmed: 18926277
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Apr;64(7):1355-62
pubmed: 17208343
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Oct 22;10:25
pubmed: 20969787
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 24;19(1):331
pubmed: 31126283
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;42(2):520-32
pubmed: 23509239
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:159-67
pubmed: 25875322
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 23;(3):CD007754
pubmed: 25803792
AIDS Care. 2010;22 Suppl 2:1606-12
pubmed: 21161765
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170175
pubmed: 28099465
BMJ. 2017 Apr 11;357:j1608
pubmed: 28400481
Matern Child Health J. 2014 May;18(4):960-9
pubmed: 23807718
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):254-8
pubmed: 12646539
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 16;4(3):e001308
pubmed: 31275619
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Jul;20(7):815-829
pubmed: 29096592