The Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine in Preterm Newborns: No Influence of Doxapram but Important Maturation with Age.


Journal

Neonatology
ISSN: 1661-7819
Titre abrégé: Neonatology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101286577

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 07 08 2020
accepted: 20 11 2020
pubmed: 25 2 2021
medline: 1 9 2021
entrez: 24 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Apnea of prematurity can persist despite caffeine therapy in preterm infants. Doxapram may additionally support breathing. Although multiple small studies have reported the efficacy of doxapram, the structural co-treatment with caffeine impedes to ascribe the efficacy to doxapram itself or to a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction where doxapram increases the exposure to caffeine. We examined whether there is a PK drug-drug interaction between doxapram and caffeine by developing a PK model for caffeine including infants with and without doxapram treatment. In preterm neonates receiving caffeine, we determined caffeine plasma concentrations before, during, and directly after doxapram co-treatment and used these to develop a population PK model in NONMEM 7.3. Patient characteristics and concomitant doxapram administration were tested as covariates. 166 plasma samples were collected from 39 preterm neonates receiving caffeine (median gestational age 25.6 [range 24.0-28.0] weeks) of which 65 samples were taken during co-treatment with doxapram (39%, from 32/39 infants). Clearance of caffeine was 9.99 mL/h for a typical preterm neonate with a birth weight of 0.8 kg and 23 days postnatal age and increased with birth weight and postnatal age, resulting in a 4-fold increase in clearance during the first month of life. No PK interaction between caffeine and doxapram was identified. Caffeine clearance is not affected by concomitant doxapram therapy but shows a rapid maturation with postnatal age. As current guidelines do not adjust the caffeine dose with postnatal age, decreased exposure to caffeine might partly explain the need for doxapram therapy after the first week of life.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Apnea of prematurity can persist despite caffeine therapy in preterm infants. Doxapram may additionally support breathing. Although multiple small studies have reported the efficacy of doxapram, the structural co-treatment with caffeine impedes to ascribe the efficacy to doxapram itself or to a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction where doxapram increases the exposure to caffeine. We examined whether there is a PK drug-drug interaction between doxapram and caffeine by developing a PK model for caffeine including infants with and without doxapram treatment.
METHODS
In preterm neonates receiving caffeine, we determined caffeine plasma concentrations before, during, and directly after doxapram co-treatment and used these to develop a population PK model in NONMEM 7.3. Patient characteristics and concomitant doxapram administration were tested as covariates.
RESULTS
166 plasma samples were collected from 39 preterm neonates receiving caffeine (median gestational age 25.6 [range 24.0-28.0] weeks) of which 65 samples were taken during co-treatment with doxapram (39%, from 32/39 infants). Clearance of caffeine was 9.99 mL/h for a typical preterm neonate with a birth weight of 0.8 kg and 23 days postnatal age and increased with birth weight and postnatal age, resulting in a 4-fold increase in clearance during the first month of life. No PK interaction between caffeine and doxapram was identified.
DISCUSSION
Caffeine clearance is not affected by concomitant doxapram therapy but shows a rapid maturation with postnatal age. As current guidelines do not adjust the caffeine dose with postnatal age, decreased exposure to caffeine might partly explain the need for doxapram therapy after the first week of life.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33626528
pii: 000513413
doi: 10.1159/000513413
doi:

Substances chimiques

Caffeine 3G6A5W338E
Doxapram 94F3830Q73

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106-113

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Aline G J Engbers (AGJ)

Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, a.g.j.engbers@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.
Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus UMC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, a.g.j.engbers@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.

Swantje Völler (S)

Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Division of BioTherapeutics, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Christian F Poets (CF)

Department of Neonatology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Catherijne A J Knibbe (CAJ)

Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Irwin K M Reiss (IKM)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus UMC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Birgit C P Koch (BCP)

Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Robert B Flint (RB)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus UMC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Sinno H P Simons (SHP)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus UMC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH