Modelling suggests limited change in the reproduction number from reopening Norwegian kindergartens and schools during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
18
08
2020
accepted:
09
02
2021
entrez:
25
2
2021
pubmed:
26
2
2021
medline:
10
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To suppress the COVID-19 outbreak, the Norwegian government closed all schools on March 13, 2020. The kindergartens reopened on April 20, and the schools on April 27 and May 11 of 2020. The effect of these measures is largely unknown since the role of children in the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still unclear. There are only a few studies of school closures as a separate intervention to other social distancing measures, and little research exists on the effect of school opening during a pandemic. This study aimed to model the effect of opening kindergartens and the schools in Norway in terms of a change in the reproduction number (R). A secondary objective was to assess if we can use the estimated R after school openings to infer the rates of transmission between children in schools. We used an individual-based model (IBM) to assess the reopening of kindergartens and schools in two Norwegian cities, Oslo, the Norwegian capital, with a population of approximately 680 000, and Tromsø, which is the largest city in Northern Norway, with a population of approximately 75 000. The model uses demographic information and detailed data about the schools in both cities. We carried out an ensemble study to obtain robust results in spite of the considerable uncertainty that remains about the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We found that reopening of Norwegian kindergartens and schools are associated with a change in R of 0.10 (95%CI 0.04-0.16) and 0.14 (95%CI 0.01-0.25) in the two cities under investigation if the in-school transmission rates for the SARS-CoV-2 virus are equal to what has previously been estimated for influenza pandemics. We found only a limited effect of reopening schools on the reproduction number, and we expect the same to hold true in other countries where nonpharmaceutical interventions have suppressed the pandemic. Consequently, current R-estimates are insufficiently accurate for determining the transmission rates in schools. For countries that have closed schools, planned interventions, such as the opening of selected schools, can be useful to infer general knowledge about children-to-children transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To suppress the COVID-19 outbreak, the Norwegian government closed all schools on March 13, 2020. The kindergartens reopened on April 20, and the schools on April 27 and May 11 of 2020. The effect of these measures is largely unknown since the role of children in the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still unclear. There are only a few studies of school closures as a separate intervention to other social distancing measures, and little research exists on the effect of school opening during a pandemic.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to model the effect of opening kindergartens and the schools in Norway in terms of a change in the reproduction number (R). A secondary objective was to assess if we can use the estimated R after school openings to infer the rates of transmission between children in schools.
METHODS
We used an individual-based model (IBM) to assess the reopening of kindergartens and schools in two Norwegian cities, Oslo, the Norwegian capital, with a population of approximately 680 000, and Tromsø, which is the largest city in Northern Norway, with a population of approximately 75 000. The model uses demographic information and detailed data about the schools in both cities. We carried out an ensemble study to obtain robust results in spite of the considerable uncertainty that remains about the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
RESULTS
We found that reopening of Norwegian kindergartens and schools are associated with a change in R of 0.10 (95%CI 0.04-0.16) and 0.14 (95%CI 0.01-0.25) in the two cities under investigation if the in-school transmission rates for the SARS-CoV-2 virus are equal to what has previously been estimated for influenza pandemics.
CONCLUSION
We found only a limited effect of reopening schools on the reproduction number, and we expect the same to hold true in other countries where nonpharmaceutical interventions have suppressed the pandemic. Consequently, current R-estimates are insufficiently accurate for determining the transmission rates in schools. For countries that have closed schools, planned interventions, such as the opening of selected schools, can be useful to infer general knowledge about children-to-children transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33630842
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238268
pii: PONE-D-20-25739
pmc: PMC7906341
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0238268Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21484-9
pubmed: 20018697
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827
pubmed: 32758453
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):252-61
pubmed: 20035236
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 May;4(5):397-404
pubmed: 32272089
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669-677
pubmed: 32240634
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jan 29;6(1):e1000656
pubmed: 20126529
Epidemics. 2019 Dec;29:100356
pubmed: 31624039
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;9(8):473-81
pubmed: 19628172
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Oct 1;174(10):921-922
pubmed: 32401277
Nature. 2006 Jul 27;442(7101):448-52
pubmed: 16642006
Science. 2005 Aug 12;309(5737):1083-7
pubmed: 16079251
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):678-688
pubmed: 32213332
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(13):
pubmed: 32265006
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934
pubmed: 32164834
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):911-919
pubmed: 32353347
Pathogens. 2016 Dec 06;5(4):
pubmed: 27929449
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 27;9:187
pubmed: 19943919
Nature. 2004 May 13;429(6988):180-4
pubmed: 15141212
Nature. 2018 Jan 17;553(7688):319-322
pubmed: 29345639
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6):
pubmed: 32179660
Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498):1481-1486
pubmed: 32350060
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7588-93
pubmed: 17416677
JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):644-54
pubmed: 17684187
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Jun 6;5(23):631-9
pubmed: 17916550
Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):209-14
pubmed: 16079797
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Oct 1;174(10):928
pubmed: 32401279
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7582-7
pubmed: 17416679