Differences between manual CPR and corpuls cpr in regard to quality and outcome: study protocol of the comparing observational multi-center prospective registry study on resuscitation (COMPRESS).
Corpuls cpr
GS Elektromedizinische Geräte G. Stemple GmbH
German resuscitation registry
Mechanical CPR
Journal
Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
ISSN: 1757-7241
Titre abrégé: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101477511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Feb 2021
25 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
04
09
2020
accepted:
11
02
2021
entrez:
26
2
2021
pubmed:
27
2
2021
medline:
1
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The effect of mechanical CPR is diversely described in the literature. Different mechanical CPR devices are available. The corpuls cpr is a new generation of piston-driven devices and was launched in 2015. The COMPRESS-trial analyzes quality of chest compression and CPR-related injuries in cases of mechanical CPR by the corpuls cpr and manual CPR. This article describes the design and study protocol of the COMPRESS-trial. This observational multi-center study includes all patients who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) where CPR is attempted in four German emergency medical systems (EMS) between January 2020 and December 2022. EMS treatment, in-hospital-treatment and outcome are anonymously reported to the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR). This information is linked with data from the defibrillator, the feedback system and the mechanical CPR device for a complete dataset. Primary endpoint is chest compression quality (complete release, compression rate, compression depth, chest compression fraction, CPR-related injuries). Secondary endpoint is survival (return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), admission to hospital and survival to hospital discharge). The trial is sponsored by GS Elektromedizinische Geräte G. Stemple GmbH. This observational multi-center study will contribute to the evaluation of mechanical chest compression devices and to the efficacy and safety of the corpuls cpr. DRKS, DRKS-ID DRKS00020819 . Registered 31 July 2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The effect of mechanical CPR is diversely described in the literature. Different mechanical CPR devices are available. The corpuls cpr is a new generation of piston-driven devices and was launched in 2015. The COMPRESS-trial analyzes quality of chest compression and CPR-related injuries in cases of mechanical CPR by the corpuls cpr and manual CPR.
METHODS
METHODS
This article describes the design and study protocol of the COMPRESS-trial. This observational multi-center study includes all patients who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) where CPR is attempted in four German emergency medical systems (EMS) between January 2020 and December 2022. EMS treatment, in-hospital-treatment and outcome are anonymously reported to the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR). This information is linked with data from the defibrillator, the feedback system and the mechanical CPR device for a complete dataset. Primary endpoint is chest compression quality (complete release, compression rate, compression depth, chest compression fraction, CPR-related injuries). Secondary endpoint is survival (return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), admission to hospital and survival to hospital discharge). The trial is sponsored by GS Elektromedizinische Geräte G. Stemple GmbH.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This observational multi-center study will contribute to the evaluation of mechanical chest compression devices and to the efficacy and safety of the corpuls cpr.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
DRKS, DRKS-ID DRKS00020819 . Registered 31 July 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33632277
doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00855-9
pii: 10.1186/s13049-021-00855-9
pmc: PMC7905890
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
39Références
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:328-40
pubmed: 25438254
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):53-61
pubmed: 24240611
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 27;23(1):100
pubmed: 30917840
Resuscitation. 2014 Jun;85(6):741-8
pubmed: 24642406
Resuscitation. 2012 Oct;83(10):1212-8
pubmed: 22465945
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):840-8
pubmed: 25565457
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):947-55
pubmed: 25467566
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):78-84
pubmed: 19947871
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Feb 27;2020:8356201
pubmed: 32211207
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229431
pubmed: 32092113
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(5):251-6
pubmed: 21593673
Resuscitation. 2020 Jan 1;146:66-73
pubmed: 31730900
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5470406
pubmed: 29392137
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:100-47
pubmed: 26477701
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(13):1649-56
pubmed: 21515626
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8:CD007260
pubmed: 30125048
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17550
pubmed: 31689757
Anaesthesist. 2018 Feb;67(2):109-117
pubmed: 29302698
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0208113
pubmed: 30601816