Prepulse inhibition vs cognitive modulation of the hand-blink reflex.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 02 2021
25 02 2021
Historique:
received:
09
09
2020
accepted:
11
02
2021
entrez:
26
2
2021
pubmed:
27
2
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The excitability of brainstem circuitries mediating defensive blinking in response to abrupt sensory inputs is continuously modulated by cortical areas, e.g., the hand-blink reflex (HBR), elicited by intense electrical median nerve stimulation, is enhanced when the stimulated hand is close to the face, with the behavioural purpose to optimize self-protection from increased threat. Here we investigated whether such cortically mediated HBR facilitation can be influenced by prepulse inhibition (PPI), which is known to occur entirely at the subcortical level. Twenty healthy volunteers underwent HBR recordings in five experimental conditions. In conditions 1 and 2, the stimulated hand was held either near (1) or far (2) from the face, respectively. In conditions 3 and 4, stimulation of the hand near the face was preceded by a peri-liminal prepulse to the index finger of the contralateral hand held either near (3) or far from the face (4). In condition 5, participants self-triggered the stimulus eliciting the HBR. We observed a reproducible HBR in 14 out of 20 participants and measured onset latency and area of the HBR in orbicularis oculi muscles bilaterally. HBR area decreased and latency increased in condition 2 relative to condition 1; HBR area decreased and latency increased markedly in condition 3, and somewhat less in condition 4, relative to conditions 1 and 2; self-stimulation (condition 5) also suppressed HBRs, but less than prepulses. These findings indicate that PPI of the HBR is more robust than the cognitive modulation exerted by top-down cortical projections. Possibly, an attentional shift to a prepulse may serve to reduce blinking in response to perturbation when it is convenient, in a given situation, not to interrupt ongoing visual processing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33633320
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84241-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-84241-6
pmc: PMC7907410
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4618Références
Neuron. 2001 Jan;29(1):287-96
pubmed: 11182099
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Apr;99:138-159
pubmed: 30685486
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Feb;43(2):196-202
pubmed: 21254084
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):119-127
pubmed: 30649514
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1992 Mar;23(1):43-7
pubmed: 1587233
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jun;171(4):530-40
pubmed: 16418853
Curr Biol. 2013 Sep 23;23(18):1764-8
pubmed: 24012310
Behav Pharmacol. 2001 Feb;12(1):45-52
pubmed: 11270511
Curr Biol. 2018 Aug 20;28(16):2527-2535.e8
pubmed: 30078569
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):218-25
pubmed: 26510762
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun;130(6):925-940
pubmed: 30981899
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 6;9(1):3661
pubmed: 30842481
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;55(9):774-80
pubmed: 1328539
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):497-507
pubmed: 18458890
Brain Res. 1994 Jul 11;650(2):313-6
pubmed: 7953697
Muscle Nerve. 1993 Dec;16(12):1351-8
pubmed: 8232392
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Jun 29;877:202-16
pubmed: 10415651
J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 24;27(4):731-40
pubmed: 17251412
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Sep;33(8):1157-67
pubmed: 19747594
Gait Posture. 2019 Sep;73:120-125
pubmed: 31323620
J Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;3(Pt 1):31-43
pubmed: 19338715
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 17;32(42):14573-82
pubmed: 23077043
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
pubmed: 7569931
Science. 1973 Jul 13;181(4095):175-7
pubmed: 4711735
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2001 May;Chapter 8:Unit 8.7
pubmed: 18428548
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb;107(3):880-9
pubmed: 22090460
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Jul;156(2-3):194-215
pubmed: 11549223
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;37(9):2415-2424
pubmed: 28154151
Psychophysiology. 1987 May;24(3):320-7
pubmed: 3602288
Psychophysiology. 1975 May;12(3):238-48
pubmed: 1153628
Brain. 1998 Feb;121 ( Pt 2):281-91
pubmed: 9549506
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Dec;22(12):1076-1090
pubmed: 30337061
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):133-51
pubmed: 22612280
Neurophysiol Clin. 1999 Feb;29(1):7-38
pubmed: 10093816
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;123(1):13-20
pubmed: 22030138
Psychophysiology. 2020 Oct;57(10):e13626
pubmed: 32573801
Muscle Nerve. 2002 Jul;26(1):14-30
pubmed: 12115945
Behav Neurosci. 1990 Jun;104(3):418-29
pubmed: 2354037
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 04;9:2458
pubmed: 30564182
Neurophysiol Clin. 2018 Jun;48(3):181-185
pubmed: 29631777
Physiol Rep. 2018 May;6(10):e13471
pubmed: 29845771
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2956-67
pubmed: 21391768
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 13;6:27737
pubmed: 27292285
Biol Psychol. 2017 Feb;123:241-249
pubmed: 28025063
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;124(1):126-35
pubmed: 22857876
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(1):49-56
pubmed: 10550502
Brain. 2002 Sep;125(Pt 9):2012-22
pubmed: 12183347
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 12;32(37):12921-7
pubmed: 22973016
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 03;6:19353
pubmed: 26839143
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Feb;51(3):937-951
pubmed: 31630450