Nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without enzalutamide, in AR-V7-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A phase-2 nonrandomized clinical trial.
Androgen Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Benzamides
/ administration & dosage
Drug Therapy, Combination
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Ipilimumab
/ administration & dosage
Male
Nitriles
/ administration & dosage
Nivolumab
/ administration & dosage
Phenylthiohydantoin
/ administration & dosage
Prognosis
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
/ drug therapy
Protein Isoforms
/ genetics
Receptors, Androgen
/ genetics
Treatment Outcome
enzalutamide
immunotherapy
ipilimumab
nivolumab
prognostic biomarker
prostatic cancer
Journal
The Prostate
ISSN: 1097-0045
Titre abrégé: Prostate
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8101368
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
revised:
26
01
2021
received:
17
11
2020
accepted:
08
02
2021
pubmed:
27
2
2021
medline:
27
8
2021
entrez:
26
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
AR-V7-positive metastatic prostate cancer is a lethal phenotype with few treatment options and poor survival. The two-cohort nonrandomized Phase 2 study of combined immune checkpoint blockade for AR-V7-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (STARVE-PC) evaluated nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg), without (Cohort 1) or with (Cohort 2) the anti-androgen enzalutamide. Co-primary endpoints were safety and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Secondary endpoints included time-to-PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), time-to-clinical/radiographic-PFS, objective response rate (ORR), PFS lasting greater than 24 weeks, and overall survival (OS). Thirty patients were treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (N = 15, Cohort 1, previously reported), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab and enzalutamide (N = 15, Cohort 2) in patients previously progressing on enzalutamide monotherapy. PSA response rate was 2/15 (13%) in cohort 1 and 0/15 in cohort 2, ORR was 2/8 (25%) in Cohort 1 and 0/9 in Cohort 2 in those with measureable disease, median PSA-PFS was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-NR) in cohort 1 and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.1-5.9) months in cohort 2, and median PFS was 3.7 (95% CI: 2.8-7.5) in cohort 1 and 2.9 (95% CI: 1.3-5.8) months in cohort 2. Three of 15 patients in cohort 1 (20%, 95% CI: 7.1%-45.2%) and 4/15 patients (26.7%, 95% CI: 10.5%-52.4%) in cohort 2 achieved a durable PFS lasting greater than 24 weeks. Median OS was 8.2 (95% CI: 5.5-10.4) in cohort 1 and 14.2 (95% CI: 8.5-NA) months in cohort 2. Efficacy results were not statistically different between cohorts. Grade-3/4 adverse events occurred in 7/15 cohort 1 patients (46%) and 8/15 cohort 2 patients (53%). Combined cohort (N = 30) baseline alkaline phosphatase and cytokine analysis suggested improved OS for patients with lower alkaline phosphatase (hazards ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11-0.82), lower circulating interleukin-7 (IL-7) (HR, 0.24; 95% Cl: 0.06-0.93) and IL-6 (HR, 0.13; 95% Cl: 0.03-0.52) levels, and higher circulating IL-17 (HR, 4.53; 95% CI: 1.47-13.93) levels. There was a trend towards improved outcomes in men with low sPD-L1 serum levels. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated only modest activity in patients with AR-V7-expressing prostate cancer, and was not sufficient to justify further exploration in unselected patients. Stratification by baseline alkaline phosphatase and cytokines (IL-6, -7, and -17) may be prognostic for outcomes to immunotherapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
AR-V7-positive metastatic prostate cancer is a lethal phenotype with few treatment options and poor survival.
METHODS
The two-cohort nonrandomized Phase 2 study of combined immune checkpoint blockade for AR-V7-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (STARVE-PC) evaluated nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg), without (Cohort 1) or with (Cohort 2) the anti-androgen enzalutamide. Co-primary endpoints were safety and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Secondary endpoints included time-to-PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), time-to-clinical/radiographic-PFS, objective response rate (ORR), PFS lasting greater than 24 weeks, and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
Thirty patients were treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (N = 15, Cohort 1, previously reported), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab and enzalutamide (N = 15, Cohort 2) in patients previously progressing on enzalutamide monotherapy. PSA response rate was 2/15 (13%) in cohort 1 and 0/15 in cohort 2, ORR was 2/8 (25%) in Cohort 1 and 0/9 in Cohort 2 in those with measureable disease, median PSA-PFS was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-NR) in cohort 1 and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.1-5.9) months in cohort 2, and median PFS was 3.7 (95% CI: 2.8-7.5) in cohort 1 and 2.9 (95% CI: 1.3-5.8) months in cohort 2. Three of 15 patients in cohort 1 (20%, 95% CI: 7.1%-45.2%) and 4/15 patients (26.7%, 95% CI: 10.5%-52.4%) in cohort 2 achieved a durable PFS lasting greater than 24 weeks. Median OS was 8.2 (95% CI: 5.5-10.4) in cohort 1 and 14.2 (95% CI: 8.5-NA) months in cohort 2. Efficacy results were not statistically different between cohorts. Grade-3/4 adverse events occurred in 7/15 cohort 1 patients (46%) and 8/15 cohort 2 patients (53%). Combined cohort (N = 30) baseline alkaline phosphatase and cytokine analysis suggested improved OS for patients with lower alkaline phosphatase (hazards ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11-0.82), lower circulating interleukin-7 (IL-7) (HR, 0.24; 95% Cl: 0.06-0.93) and IL-6 (HR, 0.13; 95% Cl: 0.03-0.52) levels, and higher circulating IL-17 (HR, 4.53; 95% CI: 1.47-13.93) levels. There was a trend towards improved outcomes in men with low sPD-L1 serum levels.
CONCLUSION
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated only modest activity in patients with AR-V7-expressing prostate cancer, and was not sufficient to justify further exploration in unselected patients. Stratification by baseline alkaline phosphatase and cytokines (IL-6, -7, and -17) may be prognostic for outcomes to immunotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33636027
doi: 10.1002/pros.24110
pmc: PMC8018565
mid: NIHMS1677166
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Benzamides
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Ipilimumab
0
Nitriles
0
Protein Isoforms
0
Receptors, Androgen
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02601014']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
326-338Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 1;69(1):16-22
pubmed: 19117982
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;2017:
pubmed: 29170762
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;142(8):1727-38
pubmed: 27256004
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Sep;23(3):367-380
pubmed: 32094489
Urology. 2001 Dec;58(6):1008-15
pubmed: 11744478
Sci Rep. 2019 May 6;9(1):6917
pubmed: 31061414
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1215-1228
pubmed: 26000489
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jul;8(2):
pubmed: 32616555
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Urology. 1995 Mar;45(3):542-9
pubmed: 7879350
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):395-405
pubmed: 31774688
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1202-1210
pubmed: 28729151
Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;59:152-159
pubmed: 27039170
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 1;37(13):1120-1129
pubmed: 30865549
Oncotarget. 2015 Jan 1;6(1):234-42
pubmed: 25428917
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D862-8
pubmed: 26582918
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1807-1813
pubmed: 29992241
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 31;9:1786
pubmed: 30108594
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 3;10(1):9077
pubmed: 32493964
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 10;37(11):867-875
pubmed: 30811280
Nat Cancer. 2021 Dec;1(12):1188-1203
pubmed: 33834176
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 26;14(2):e0212978
pubmed: 30807610
Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:1-6
pubmed: 28212990
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1463-9
pubmed: 26940869
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 1;17(7):1915-23
pubmed: 21355078
Hematology. 2019 Dec;24(1):392-398
pubmed: 30890046
Prostate. 2019 Sep;79(13):1572-1579
pubmed: 31389628
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3745-3755
pubmed: 31087180
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):40-47
pubmed: 28034081
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 01;2(11):1441-1449
pubmed: 27262168
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;15(11):663-675
pubmed: 30135575
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):1028-38
pubmed: 25184630
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Jan;19(1):115-125
pubmed: 27916435
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):700-12
pubmed: 24831977
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1148-59
pubmed: 18309951
Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 14;90(12):2312-6
pubmed: 15150588
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;26(3):876-883
pubmed: 30565045
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Aug;1(5):582-91
pubmed: 26181238
J Exp Med. 2020 Jan 6;217(1):
pubmed: 31727783
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3851-3858
pubmed: 28678668
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):843-851
pubmed: 31542304
Med Oncol. 2019 May 27;36(7):60
pubmed: 31134385
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):443-53
pubmed: 27433846
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
Oncotarget. 2018 Jun 19;9(47):28561-28571
pubmed: 29983880