Tissue growth constrains root organ outlines into an isometrically scalable shape.


Journal

Development (Cambridge, England)
ISSN: 1477-9129
Titre abrégé: Development
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701744

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 02 2021
Historique:
received: 23 08 2020
accepted: 11 01 2021
entrez: 27 2 2021
pubmed: 28 2 2021
medline: 31 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Organ morphologies are diverse but also conserved under shared developmental constraints among species. Any geometrical similarities in the shape behind diversity and the underlying developmental constraints remain unclear. Plant root tip outlines commonly exhibit a dome shape, which likely performs physiological functions, despite the diversity in size and cellular organization among distinct root classes and/or species. We carried out morphometric analysis of the primary roots of ten angiosperm species and of the lateral roots (LRs) of

Identifiants

pubmed: 33637613
pii: 148/4/dev196253
doi: 10.1242/dev.196253
pmc: PMC7929931
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Development. 2018 Jul 10;145(13):
pubmed: 29991476
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):447-450
pubmed: 28792935
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 7;282(1816):20151935
pubmed: 26446812
Curr Biol. 2017 Nov 20;27(22):3468-3479.e4
pubmed: 29129534
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3356-60
pubmed: 20160106
Plant Cell. 2015 Aug;27(8):2119-32
pubmed: 26265761
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018 Jul;79:48-57
pubmed: 29199138
Development. 2017 Dec 1;144(23):4284-4297
pubmed: 29183941
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e84337
pubmed: 24367654
Ann Bot. 2006 May;97(5):917-23
pubmed: 16488922
Plant Physiol. 1985 Sep;79(1):318-20
pubmed: 16664396
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):178-83
pubmed: 24408432
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404
pubmed: 30164232
Cell. 2012 Apr 13;149(2):439-51
pubmed: 22500806
Plant Physiol. 2017 Aug;174(4):2289-2301
pubmed: 28600344
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 19;10:206
pubmed: 30941149
Plant Cell. 2011 Nov;23(11):4013-24
pubmed: 22045917
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Aug;18(8):450-8
pubmed: 23701908
Int Rev Cytol. 1983;81:191-248
pubmed: 6347934
Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 16;5:3700
pubmed: 24739280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 26;110(13):5229-34
pubmed: 23479644
Cell. 2010 Sep 3;142(5):773-86
pubmed: 20813263
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:563-90
pubmed: 22404466
Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Sep;14(9):467-78
pubmed: 19717328
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8685-90
pubmed: 24912195
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 04;7:1651
pubmed: 27867389
Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 20;6:8974
pubmed: 26584889
Development. 2013 Nov;140(21):4301-10
pubmed: 24130327
Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 18;17(24):2095-104
pubmed: 18082406
Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1650-5
pubmed: 19074340
Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):439-49
pubmed: 26832441
Plant Reprod. 2015 Dec;28(3-4):161-9
pubmed: 26454832
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0197411
pubmed: 29874267
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Aug;94(4):1261-1281
pubmed: 30793489
Ann Bot. 2012 Jul;110(2):491-501
pubmed: 22700942
Biol Open. 2019 Oct 18;8(10):
pubmed: 31628142
Plant Cell. 2007 Jul;19(7):2156-68
pubmed: 17630277
Development. 2015 Dec 1;142(23):4168-79
pubmed: 26493404
Development. 2019 Mar 15;146(6):
pubmed: 30858228
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(19):5651-62
pubmed: 26068468
Plant Cell. 2015 May;27(5):1368-88
pubmed: 25944102
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018 Apr 29;69:469-495
pubmed: 29505739
Dev Cell. 2016 Jul 11;38(1):15-32
pubmed: 27404356
J Exp Bot. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):126-137
pubmed: 31682268
Development. 2016 Sep 15;143(18):3363-71
pubmed: 27510971
Development. 2015 Feb 1;142(3):420-30
pubmed: 25605778
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):14325-14330
pubmed: 31235573
Am J Bot. 2008 Jan;95(1):1-21
pubmed: 21632311
J Theor Biol. 1965 Mar;8(2):264-75
pubmed: 5876240
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 7;285(1890):
pubmed: 30404875

Auteurs

Motohiro Fujiwara (M)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka 560-0043, Japan.

Tatsuaki Goh (T)

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Takayama, Ikoma 630-0192, Japan goh@bs.naist.jp fujimoto@bio.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Satoru Tsugawa (S)

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Takayama, Ikoma 630-0192, Japan.

Keiji Nakajima (K)

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Takayama, Ikoma 630-0192, Japan.

Hidehiro Fukaki (H)

Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Rokkodai, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.

Koichi Fujimoto (K)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka 560-0043, Japan.

Articles similaires

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis
1.00
Oryza Agricultural Irrigation Potassium Sodium Soil
Glycine max Photoperiod Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Flowers Gene Expression Regulation, Plant

Classifications MeSH