No efficacy of biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: a randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Clinical and experimental dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2230
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7606847

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
revised: 18 02 2021
received: 08 01 2021
accepted: 22 02 2021
pubmed: 28 2 2021
medline: 30 11 2021
entrez: 27 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although biofield therapy is unexplained by scientific evidence, it has been practised for many years in numerous cultures for a variety of medical conditions. This study aimed to determine whether one session of biofield therapy with an experienced practitioner could treat warts on the hands and feet in adults. A single-blind, assessor-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was performed between April 2016 and November 2018. The enrolled participants had at least one wart on the hand or foot that had been present for at least 90 days and they were not using any other therapy for the wart. The primary outcome of this trial was the disappearance of the original wart 3 weeks after session of proximal nontouch biofield therapy vs. a sham session. No original wart had disappeared 3 weeks after intervention (0/64), which made the study impossible to conclude on the primary objective. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning wart disappearance 3 weeks (P = 0.49) or 6 weeks (P = 0.40) after the intervention. Reduction in wart size at Week 3 tended towards a better result for biofield therapy but this was not significant (P = 0.27). No related adverse effects were observed. The major limitation of this trial was the short follow-up time for measurement of clinical outcome, which did not allow verification of the hypothesis. However, this study shows that 3 weeks after a session of proximal nontouch biofield therapy is an insufficient length of time to assess biofield therapy in comparison with a sham session. Based on this study, biofield therapy cannot be recommended to treat warts within 3 weeks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33639007
doi: 10.1111/ced.14623
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

874-879

Subventions

Organisme : GIRCI Nord Ouest AAP Paramedical
ID : AAP-P-2015

Informations de copyright

© 2021 British Association of Dermatologists.

Références

Rubik B, Muehsam D, Hammerschlag R, Jain S. Biofield science and healing: history, terminology, and concepts. Glob Adv Health Med 2015; 4: 8-14.
Jain S, Mills PJ. Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis. Int J Behav Med 2010; 17: 1-16.
Jain S, Hammerschlag R, Mills P et al. Clinical studies of biofield therapies: summary, methodological challenges, and recommendations. Global Adv Health Med 2015; 4: 58-66.
Mühlenpfordt I, Stritter W, Bertram M et al. The power of touch: external applications from whole medical systems in the care of cancer patients (literature review). Support Care Cancer 2020; 28: 461-71.
Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Stevinson C et al. Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized, clinical trial. Pain 2001; 91: 79-89.
Carpenter JS, Neal JG. Other complementary and alternative medicine modalities: acupuncture, magnets, reflexology, and homeopathy. Am J Med 2005; 118: 109-17.
Saurat JH, Lachapelle JM, Lipsker D, Thomas L. [Dermatology and Transmissible Sexual Infections] (in French). Issy-les-Moulineaux Cedex: Elsevier Masson SAS, 2009.
Sterling JC, Gibbs S, Haque Hussain SS et al. British association of dermatologists' guidelines for the management of cutaneous warts 2014. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 696-712.
Gaillard C, Allain L, Legros H et al. Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study). Trials 2017; 18: 263.
Harkness EF, Abbot NC, Ernst E. A randomized trial of distant healing for skin warts. Am J Med 2000; 108: 448-52.
Warber SL, Gordon A, Gillespie BW et al. Standards for conducting clinical biofield energy healing research. Altern Ther Health Med 2003; 9: A54-64.

Auteurs

C Gaillard (C)

Departments of, Clinical Research.

L Allain (L)

Departments of, Clinical Research.

C Rouillon (C)

Departments of, Clinical Research.

Y Desgue (Y)

Biofield Therapy Center, 17 rue des ormes, F-50570, Marigny, France.

S Brucato (S)

Departments of, Clinical Research.

L Peyro-Saint-Paul (L)

Departments of, Clinical Research.

A Dompmartin (A)

Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH