Assessing the Value of Cemiplimab for Adults With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ drug therapy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Health Expenditures
Humans
Models, Econometric
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Skin Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Survival Analysis
United States
advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
cemiplimab
cost-effectiveness
Journal
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
ISSN: 1524-4733
Titre abrégé: Value Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
07
07
2020
revised:
11
09
2020
accepted:
25
09
2020
entrez:
1
3
2021
pubmed:
2
3
2021
medline:
7
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) from a payer perspective in the United States. A partitioned survival model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab versus historical standard of care (SOC). All inputs were identified based on a systematic literature review, supplemented by expert opinion where necessary. Clinical inputs for cemiplimab were based on individual patient data from a cemiplimab phase 2 single-arm trial (NCT27060498). For SOC, analysis was based on a pooled analysis of single-arm clinical trials and retrospective studies evaluating chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab, erlotinib, and gefitinib) identified via a systematic literature review (6 of the 27 included studies). Overall survival and progression-free survival were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon. Costs were included for drug acquisition, drug administration, management of adverse events, subsequent therapy, disease management, and terminal care. Unit costs were based on published 2019 US list prices. In the base case, cemiplimab versus SOC resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $99 447 per quality adjusted-life year (QALY), where incremental costs and QALYs were $372 108 and 3.74, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000/QALY, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggests a 90% probability that cemiplimab is cost-effective compared to SOC. Scenario analyses resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $90 590 to $148 738. Compared with historical SOC, cemiplimab is a cost-effective use of US payer resources for the treatment of advanced CSCC and is expected to provide value for money.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33641772
pii: S1098-3015(20)34422-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.014
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
cemiplimab
6QVL057INT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
377-387Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.