A randomized, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner flavored chewable tablets (Credelio™ CAT) in eliminating fleas in client-owned cats in the USA.
Administration, Oral
Animals
Cat Diseases
/ drug therapy
Cats
Ctenocephalides
/ drug effects
Female
Flea Infestations
/ drug therapy
Hospitals, Animal
Insecticides
/ administration & dosage
Male
Mastication
Ownership
Oxazoles
/ administration & dosage
Pets
/ parasitology
Random Allocation
Skin
/ drug effects
Tablets
/ therapeutic use
Thiophenes
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
United States
Clinical field study
Credelio™ CAT
Ctenocephalides felis
Efficacy
FAD
Fipronil
Flea allergy dermatitis
Fleas
Frontline® plus
Lotilaner
Safety
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2021
01 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
accepted:
29
01
2021
entrez:
2
3
2021
pubmed:
3
3
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies show that the novel isoxazoline, lotilaner (Credelio™ CAT; Elanco Animal Health), which is administered orally to cats, provides rapid and sustained flea kill for least 1 month following administration with a wide safety margin. A clinical trial was undertaken to confirm its efficacy, impact on flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) and safety under field conditions. A total of 343 cats were enrolled in the study at 11 veterinary clinics in the USA. Upon inclusion, cat households were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive lotilaner tablets at the recommended dose (minimum 6 mg/kg) or a topical formulation containing fipronil + S-methoprene (Frontline® Plus for cats; Boehringer Ingelheim), administered per label. Owners were dispensed treatments for administration on days 0, 30 and 60; all household cats were administered the same treatment. Flea counts were made on primary cats (1 cat per household) on days 0 (pre-treatment), 30, 60 and 90. Flea allergy dermatitis was assessed on days 30, 60 and 90 for all cats with signs of FAD on day 0. Lotilaner-treated cats were also assessed for their acceptance of oral tablet administration by the pet owner, and safety was assessed for all cats in both groups. Lotilaner efficacy was 98.3, 99.9 and 99.9% on days 30, 60 and 90, respectively, while the efficacy of fipronil + S-methoprene was 61.6, 75.4 and 84.7%, respectively (P < 0.0001, within both groups and all days). Flea counts were significantly lower in the lotilaner group than in the fipronil + S-methoprene group (P < 0.0001) on each assessment day. On day 90, 98.3% of lotilaner-treated cats and 28.8% of fipronil + S-methoprene-treated cats were free of fleas. Owners successfully administered 99.5% of tablets to their cats. Total FAD score was reduced significantly following treatment in both groups by day 30 (lotilaner: P < 0.0001; fipronil + S-methoprene: P = 0.0041) and continued to decrease following multiple treatments. Total FAD scores were also significantly lower in the lotilaner group than in the fipronil + S-methoprene group on day 90 (P = 0.0006 for FAD total score). Pruritus scores were significantly lower in the lotilaner group on all assessment days. A single lotilaner treatment, administered by the pet owner, was > 98% efficacious in reducing flea counts within 30 days. Three consecutive monthly lotilaner treatments resulted in nearly 100% reduction in flea infestation. In the evaluations of flea counts, number of cats free from fleas and pruritus FAD score, lotilaner was shown to be superior to fipronil + S-methoprene at all time points. Lotilaner was more efficacious than fipronil + S-methoprene and was associated with greater reduction in FAD signs. Lotilaner flavored tablets were well accepted by cats. Adverse reactions were mild and infrequent, confirming the safety of lotilaner tablets in client-owned cats.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Studies show that the novel isoxazoline, lotilaner (Credelio™ CAT; Elanco Animal Health), which is administered orally to cats, provides rapid and sustained flea kill for least 1 month following administration with a wide safety margin. A clinical trial was undertaken to confirm its efficacy, impact on flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) and safety under field conditions.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 343 cats were enrolled in the study at 11 veterinary clinics in the USA. Upon inclusion, cat households were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive lotilaner tablets at the recommended dose (minimum 6 mg/kg) or a topical formulation containing fipronil + S-methoprene (Frontline® Plus for cats; Boehringer Ingelheim), administered per label. Owners were dispensed treatments for administration on days 0, 30 and 60; all household cats were administered the same treatment. Flea counts were made on primary cats (1 cat per household) on days 0 (pre-treatment), 30, 60 and 90. Flea allergy dermatitis was assessed on days 30, 60 and 90 for all cats with signs of FAD on day 0. Lotilaner-treated cats were also assessed for their acceptance of oral tablet administration by the pet owner, and safety was assessed for all cats in both groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Lotilaner efficacy was 98.3, 99.9 and 99.9% on days 30, 60 and 90, respectively, while the efficacy of fipronil + S-methoprene was 61.6, 75.4 and 84.7%, respectively (P < 0.0001, within both groups and all days). Flea counts were significantly lower in the lotilaner group than in the fipronil + S-methoprene group (P < 0.0001) on each assessment day. On day 90, 98.3% of lotilaner-treated cats and 28.8% of fipronil + S-methoprene-treated cats were free of fleas. Owners successfully administered 99.5% of tablets to their cats. Total FAD score was reduced significantly following treatment in both groups by day 30 (lotilaner: P < 0.0001; fipronil + S-methoprene: P = 0.0041) and continued to decrease following multiple treatments. Total FAD scores were also significantly lower in the lotilaner group than in the fipronil + S-methoprene group on day 90 (P = 0.0006 for FAD total score). Pruritus scores were significantly lower in the lotilaner group on all assessment days.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A single lotilaner treatment, administered by the pet owner, was > 98% efficacious in reducing flea counts within 30 days. Three consecutive monthly lotilaner treatments resulted in nearly 100% reduction in flea infestation. In the evaluations of flea counts, number of cats free from fleas and pruritus FAD score, lotilaner was shown to be superior to fipronil + S-methoprene at all time points. Lotilaner was more efficacious than fipronil + S-methoprene and was associated with greater reduction in FAD signs. Lotilaner flavored tablets were well accepted by cats. Adverse reactions were mild and infrequent, confirming the safety of lotilaner tablets in client-owned cats.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33648556
doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04617-5
pii: 10.1186/s13071-021-04617-5
pmc: PMC7923547
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Oxazoles
0
Tablets
0
Thiophenes
0
lotilaner
0
Types de publication
Clinical Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
127Références
Blagburn BL, Dryden MW. Biology, treatment, and control of flea and tick infestations. Vet Clin Small Anim. 2009;39:1173–200.
doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.07.001
Carlotti DN, Jacobs D. Therapy, control and prevention of flea allergy dermatitis in dogs and cats. Vet Dermatol. 2000;11:83–98.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.2000.00204.x
Dryden MW, Rust MK. The cat flea: biology, ecology and control. Vet Parasitol. 1994;52:1–19.
doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)90031-0
Rust MK, Dryden MW. The biology, ecology, and management of the cat flea. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:451–73.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.451
Dryden MW. Host association, on-host longevity and egg production of Ctenocephalides felis felis. Vet Parasitol. 1989;34:117–22.
doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(89)90171-4
Obendorf SK, Lemley AT, Hedge A, Kline AA, Tan K, Dokuchayeva T. Distribution of pesticide residues within homes in central New York State. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2006;50:31–44.
doi: 10.1007/s00244-004-0185-y
Kuntz E, Kammanadiminti S. Safety of lotilanerflavoured chewable tablets (Credelio™) after oral administration in cats. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:409.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2969-3
Elanco data on file. Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN. https://elanco.com/ . Accessed 16 Feb 2021.
Cavalleri D, Murphy M, Seewald W, Nanchen S. Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy and speed of kill of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Ctenocephalides felis on cats. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:408.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2972-8
Marchiondo AA, Holdsworth PA, Fourie LJ, Rugg D, Hellmann K, Snyder DE, et al. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition: guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats. Vet Parasitol. 2013;194:84–97.
United States Food and Drug Administration–Center for Veterinary Medicine (FDA-CVM). Guidance for Industry 85, International Co-operation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Products (VICH) GL9, Good Clinical Practice. 2001. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cvm-gfi-85-vich-gl9-good-clinical-practice . Accessed 17 Jan 2021.
Cavalleri D, Murphy M, Seewald W, Drake J, Nanchen S. A randomised, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner (CredelioTM) in controlling fleas in client-owned cats in Europe. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:410.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2971-9
Meadows C, Guerino F, Sun F. A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:37.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-1972-4
Vatta A, Myers M, Rugg J, Chapin S, Pullins A, King V, et al. Efficacy and safety of a combination of selamectin plus sarolaner for the treatment and prevention of flea infestations and the treatment of ear mites in cats presented as veterinary patients in the United States. Vet Parasitol. 2019;270(Suppl 1):S3–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.11.009