The Accuracy of the Surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Cancer.


Journal

Digestive surgery
ISSN: 1421-9883
Titre abrégé: Dig Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8501808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 10 02 2020
accepted: 15 11 2020
pubmed: 4 3 2021
medline: 23 11 2021
entrez: 3 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). The PCI is determined during laparotomy by 2 experienced surgeons and plays a major role in the decision to proceed with CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the surgical PCI (sPCI) by comparing it with the PCI confirmed by the pathologist (pPCI). All consecutive patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases between February 2015 and June 2018 were identified. Relevant patient- and tumor-related characteristics were collected. In total, 119 patients were included, 60 males (50.4%). The median age was 64 (IQR 55-71). The median sPCI (sPCI = 11, IQR 6-16) was significantly higher than the median pPCI (pPCI = 8, IQR 3-13, p < 0.001). The total pPCI was lower than the total sPCI in 80 patients (67.2%). In 21 patients (17.6%), the sPCI was overestimated with ≥5 points. Small lesions are more likely to be negative. In patients that underwent resection of their primary tumor prior to CRS-HIPEC, the difference between the sPCI and pPCI was significantly larger (p < 0.05). Surgical calculation of the PCI often results in overestimation. Far-reaching consequences are tied to the macroscopic evaluation of the sPCI, but this evaluation seems not very reliable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33657551
pii: 000513353
doi: 10.1159/000513353
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

205-211

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Nadine L de Boer (NL)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, n.deboer@erasmusmc.nl.

Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof (ARM)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Eva V E Madsen (EVE)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Michael Doukas (M)

Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Cornelis Verhoef (C)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Jacobus W A Burger (JWA)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH