Measurement of the uterocervical angle for the prediction of preterm birth in symptomatic women.


Journal

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
received: 23 10 2020
accepted: 10 02 2021
pubmed: 7 3 2021
medline: 10 11 2021
entrez: 6 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To examine if the uterocervical angle (UCA) can be used to predict preterm delivery in women with painful and regular uterine contractions and a cervical length of 25 mm or less. Retrospective study at the perinatal unit of the University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany. Women with singleton gestation and preterm contractions between 24 + 0 and 33 + 6 weeks' gestation were included. For the UCA measurement, a line is placed from the internal os to the external os irrespective of whether the cervix is straight or curved. A second line is drawn to delineate the lower uterine segment. The angle between the two lines is the UCA measurement. The measurements were taken on stored images from our database. The study consisted of 213 singleton pregnancies. At the time of UCA measurement, median maternal and gestational age was 31.4 years and 29.7 weeks' gestation. Median gestational age at delivery was 35.3 weeks and the corresponding birth weight 2480 g, respectively. The UCA measurement in women who delivered within 2 days, between 3-7 days and after 7 days was not helpful to distinguish between these three groups [median UCA measurements: 108.5°, 108.0° and 107.3° (Kruskal-Wallis test p = 0.576)]. Uni- and multivariate logistic multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the delivery within 2 days was only dependent on the gestational age and the cervical length at the time of presentation. The measurement of UCA is not useful in predicting preterm birth in the subsequent 7 days after an episode of preterm contractions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33674963
doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06002-0
pii: 10.1007/s00404-021-06002-0
pmc: PMC8325658
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

663-669

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Am J Perinatol. 2019 Nov;36(13):1317-1324
pubmed: 31039598
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):322-329
pubmed: 27997053
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 26;2018:1837478
pubmed: 30687736
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):496-501
pubmed: 31066097
BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:52-6
pubmed: 17206965
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Dec;41(8):445-451
pubmed: 28935263
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):457-62
pubmed: 14990406
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;45(3):358-62
pubmed: 25632014
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):376.e1-7
pubmed: 27018466
Lancet. 2001 Mar 31;357(9261):989-94
pubmed: 11293641
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):214-9
pubmed: 16443225
Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2068-2070
pubmed: 26944025
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;35(1):54-64
pubmed: 20014326
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):377-8
pubmed: 25627241
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):2902-2908
pubmed: 30668186
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;29(1):47-50
pubmed: 17201013
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(43):1-627
pubmed: 19796569
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Nov;69:40-49
pubmed: 33039310
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;52(6):757-762
pubmed: 29155504
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):557-558
pubmed: 31290211
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;296(1):27-34
pubmed: 28484835
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Jul;76(7):779-784
pubmed: 27582575
J Perinat Med. 2018 Jul 26;46(5):489-501
pubmed: 29813033
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Feb;72(2):117-25
pubmed: 11166744
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;25(4):346-52
pubmed: 15789375
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 25;9:CD007235
pubmed: 31553800
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;52:23-32
pubmed: 30309793

Auteurs

Philipp Wagner (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Jana Schlechtendahl (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Markus Hoopmann (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Natalia Prodan (N)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Harald Abele (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Karl Oliver Kagan (KO)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. KOKagan@gmx.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH