Prognostic and predictive impact of consensus molecular subtypes and CRCAssigner classifications in metastatic colorectal cancer: a translational analysis of the TRIBE2 study.
CRCAssigner
FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab
biomarkers
consensus molecular subtypes
metastatic colorectal cancer
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
08
01
2021
revised:
02
02
2021
accepted:
03
02
2021
pubmed:
7
3
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
entrez:
6
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) demonstrated prognostic value in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Similarly, a prognostic impact was suggested for the pre-consensus CRCAssigner (CRCA) classifier in early stages. The potential predictive role of these classifiers with regard to the choice of the first-line therapy has not been established. We investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of CMS and CRCA subtypes among mCRC patients treated in the TRIBE2 study. Among 679 randomized patients, 426 and 428 (63%) samples were profiled according to CMS and CRCA classifications, respectively. The prognostic and predictive impact of both CMS and CRCA subtypes was investigated with univariate and multivariate analyses for progression-free survival (PFS), PFS 2 (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Significant associations of CMS and CRCA subtypes with PFS, PFS2, and OS were demonstrated; the CMS classifier confirmed its independent prognostic value in the multivariable model (P value for PFS/PFS2/OS = 0.01/0.07/0.08). The effect of treatment intensification was independent of CMS subtypes (P value for interaction for PFS/PFS2/OS = 0.88/0.75/0.55). A significant interaction effect between CRCA subtypes and treatment arm was demonstrated in PFS (P = 0.02), PFS2 (P = 0.01), and OS (P = 0.008). The benefit of FOLFOXIRI seemed more relevant in the stem-like (PFS, hazard ratio = 0.60; P = 0.03) and mixed subtypes (hazard ratio = 0.44; P = 0.002). These findings were confirmed in a subgroup of patients of the previous TRIBE study. We confirmed the independent prognostic role of CMS classification in mCRC independently of RAS/BRAF status. CRCA classification may help identifying subgroups of patients who may derive more benefit from FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33676295
pii: S2059-7029(21)00029-6
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100073
pmc: PMC8103536
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Camptothecin
XT3Z54Z28A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100073Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure AS received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck KGaA, and Pierre Fabre. Patents: (i) ‘Colorectal cancer classification with differential prognosis and personalized therapeutic responses’ (patent number PCT/IB2013/060416); (ii) ‘Prognostic and treatment response predictive method’ [European (EP) patent application number: 18792565.6], and (iii) ‘Patient classification and prognostic method’ (international patent application number: PCT/EP2019/053845). CC is a consultant/advisory board member for Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Merck Serono, Servier. AF is a consultant/advisory board member for Bayer, Roche, Amgen, Eli-Lilly, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Servier. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
BMC Med Genomics. 2012 Dec 31;5:66
pubmed: 23272949
Nat Commun. 2017 May 31;8:15657
pubmed: 28561046
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1546-58
pubmed: 23539594
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):120-130
pubmed: 33109741
Ann Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;30(11):1796-1803
pubmed: 31868905
Int J Cancer. 2014 Feb 1;134(3):552-62
pubmed: 23852808
J Pathol. 2013 Sep;231(1):63-76
pubmed: 23836465
Nat Med. 2013 May;19(5):614-8
pubmed: 23584090
Nat Med. 2013 May;19(5):619-25
pubmed: 23584089
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;2(9):1162-9
pubmed: 27270348
Sci Rep. 2019 May 21;9(1):7665
pubmed: 31113981
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001453
pubmed: 23700391
Nat Med. 2015 Nov;21(11):1350-6
pubmed: 26457759
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1876-1885
pubmed: 31042420
Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2240-2246
pubmed: 30247524
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1306-15
pubmed: 26338525
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Jun;8(6):415-24
pubmed: 18480839
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Nov 23;19(12):
pubmed: 30477151
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):497-507
pubmed: 32164906