Community-based organizations' perspectives on improving health and social service integration.
Health and social service integration
High-risk populations
Medicaid populations
Social determinants of health
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 03 2021
06 03 2021
Historique:
received:
26
11
2020
accepted:
10
02
2021
entrez:
7
3
2021
pubmed:
8
3
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Collaborations between health systems and community-based organizations (CBOs) are increasingly common mechanisms to address the unmet health-related social needs of high-risk populations. However, there is limited evidence on how to develop, manage, and sustain these partnerships, and implementation rarely incorporates perspectives of community social service organizations. To address these gaps, we elicited CBOs' perspectives on service delivery for clients, the impact of the Whole Person Care-Los Angeles (WPC-LA) initiative to integrate health and social care, and their suggestions for improving health system partnerships. Using stakeholder engaged principles and a qualitative Rapid Assessment Process, we conducted brief surveys and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 65 key informants from 36 CBOs working with WPC-LA. Major themes identified by CBOs included: 1) the importance of a holistic, client-centered, continuously engaged approach that is reliant on regional partnerships; 2) benefits of WPC-LA expanding capacity and networks; 3) concerns about communication and redundancy hindering WPC-LA; and 4) a need for more equitable partnerships incorporating their approaches. CBOs value opportunities for integration with health systems, bring critical expertise to these partnerships, and seek to strengthen cross-sector collaborations. Early, equitable, and inclusive participation in the development and implementation of these partnerships may enhance their effectiveness, but requires policy that prioritizes and incentivizes sustainable and mutually beneficial partnerships.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Collaborations between health systems and community-based organizations (CBOs) are increasingly common mechanisms to address the unmet health-related social needs of high-risk populations. However, there is limited evidence on how to develop, manage, and sustain these partnerships, and implementation rarely incorporates perspectives of community social service organizations. To address these gaps, we elicited CBOs' perspectives on service delivery for clients, the impact of the Whole Person Care-Los Angeles (WPC-LA) initiative to integrate health and social care, and their suggestions for improving health system partnerships.
METHODS
Using stakeholder engaged principles and a qualitative Rapid Assessment Process, we conducted brief surveys and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 65 key informants from 36 CBOs working with WPC-LA.
RESULTS
Major themes identified by CBOs included: 1) the importance of a holistic, client-centered, continuously engaged approach that is reliant on regional partnerships; 2) benefits of WPC-LA expanding capacity and networks; 3) concerns about communication and redundancy hindering WPC-LA; and 4) a need for more equitable partnerships incorporating their approaches.
CONCLUSIONS
CBOs value opportunities for integration with health systems, bring critical expertise to these partnerships, and seek to strengthen cross-sector collaborations. Early, equitable, and inclusive participation in the development and implementation of these partnerships may enhance their effectiveness, but requires policy that prioritizes and incentivizes sustainable and mutually beneficial partnerships.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33676470
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10449-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10449-w
pmc: PMC7937223
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
452Références
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2018 Jan 01;2018:1-11
pubmed: 29320140
JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1461-1470
pubmed: 28324029
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct;280:112516
pubmed: 31437661
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Oct;30(10):1852-9
pubmed: 21976326
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):192-198
pubmed: 32011928
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 09;10:E05
pubmed: 24406092
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2:19-31
pubmed: 24385661
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Jan;48(1):143-154
pubmed: 32504269
Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):92-7
pubmed: 8671109
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Jul;14:1-9
pubmed: 25065021
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S70-S71
pubmed: 30699027
Qual Health Res. 2002 Jul;12(6):855-66
pubmed: 12109729
Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72
pubmed: 27189233
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S74-S81
pubmed: 31753282
BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3
pubmed: 7627048
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):30-37
pubmed: 29309220
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A119
pubmed: 20950526
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Apr;39(4):567-573
pubmed: 32250685